EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Half of EU electricity from wind by 2050

Published 03 August 2011 - Updated 09 August 2011
Comments18
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

Half of the EU’s electricity requirements could be fuelled by wind power by 2050 according to a report by the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), which has renewed calls for the Commission to impose a target for renewable energy beyond 2020.

Wind energy currently meets 5.3% of the EU’s electricity consumption. EWEA’s report – called “Pure Power” – claims that figure could more than treble by 2020 arriving at 18.4% of EU electricity demand.

The figure is an optimal one, and EWEA also admit that the rise could only be to 15.4%, which conforms to the broad consensus of projections from other sources.

For example the projection derived from adding all the National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAPs) suggests wind energy could reach 14% of EU demand by 2020.

Similarly the Commission’s own projections – compiled using the PRIMES energy model by the E3M Lab at the National Technical University of Athens in 2009 – claims wind energy would meet 14.2% of total consumption by 2020.

Radical claims for 2030/2050

Where EWEA’s projections part from the norm are in the group’s radical claims for the potential share of the electricity market wind could take by 2030 (28.5%) and 2050 (50%).

One reason why EWEA claims that such large share of the market can be taken by wind is that these figures are for the electricity market exclusive of central heating and transport – two very large net users of energy.

Such targets would take the EU from 19% renewable electricity today, to an expected 34% in 2020, and to 100% renewable electricity by 2050, according to EWEA.

But the group insists that these figures will only be attainable if policymakers put the right conditions in place.

EWEA Commission must act to impose targets

Justin Wilkes, EWEA’s head of policy, said EU renewables legislation is needed for the period after 2020. He told EurActiv that the targets imposed to that date by the Commission had had a beneficial effect, but added that more targets were needed for the period following 2020.

“The Commission is finalising its Energy Roadmap 2050 later this year, and that would be the perfect opportunity for them to give a clear target for renewables beyond 2020,” said Wilkes.

He added: “In addition to post-2020 legislation, investment is urgently needed in electricity infrastructure in order to transport large amounts of wind energy from where it is produced to where it is consumed and to create a single electricity market in the EU.”

Next steps: 
  • Autumn 2011: European Commission releases its Energy Roadmap for 2050.

COMMENTS

  • The report contains some interesting comments with respect to PRIMES. Indeed, the EWEA gave PRIMES a "good kicking" in the 2009 version of the "Pure Power" report. A question the EC needs to answer is, given PRIMES, to say the least, seems flaky (and given the comments on Page 45 of the current report) why is the EC still using PRIMES and the E3M Lab? Or.... why are the basic assumptions of the model not made public - surely not a case of shyness on the part of E3M or the EC? or perhaps more a case of being unable to admit that the model for many years has been a bit errrr ... outdated - but nobody wants to admit that - because if they did and to quote the 2009 version of the report (page 34)then the EC and or E3M would be deliberatly misleading both EU politicians and the general public - and surely they would not do that - would they? There is an old saying, "garbage in - garbage out". One has a very strong feeling given the consistent tone of two Pure Power reports, that this phrase applies very much to the PRIMES methdology and its guardians the E3M Lab. The question is, why is the EC so reluctant to act? Over to you Guenther.
    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    03/08/2011
  • This is a joke - right? Please tell me it's a joke!
    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    05/08/2011
  • Not a chance. Fantasy. Does the EU et al really believe this nonsense, or is it a blatantly open plan to kill tens of thousands through hypothermia, what remaining industry there is to collapse, and put those who survive huddled around a bunch of burning sticks in a cave? Welcome to 'renewable' world.
    By :
    Watcher
    - Posted on :
    05/08/2011
  • More trolls I see, paid for by whom, I wonder, making pretty stupid comments as well. Denmark has a very high level of renewables (in terms of electricity) I don't see them huddling round fires. Tell me watcher - who pays you?
    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    05/08/2011
  • Mike Parr (for the course ? ) Do the math Mike, Denmark exports most of its wind power, the system cannot absorb the fluctuations, and imports power from its neighbours, the cost to the Danish taxpayer is 87% more than they produce by wind !
    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    05/08/2011
  • Mike Parr who pays you? This is not a joke but will never come to pass. In fact within a year the Euro will be broken, the full reality of where our foolish political leaders have lead us will have finally sunk in, and most countries including Germany Denmark and the UK will have had to ditch all fluff project like this just to survive. There is no money left in the kitty for this nonsense. the EU will have to be restructured and hopefully will return to an open trading market as it was when many people voted for it. Regulation will have to be reigned in as it is destroying competition, innovation and quality of the products made in the EU, not to mention competitiveness with the rest of the world. And to think all this on the back of seriously flawed science.
    By :
    napiersabre
    - Posted on :
    05/08/2011
  • Jokes eh - wish I had a Euro for every time a half wit cracked a joke on my name. Denmark exports then it imports - which perhaps is the point of having interconnectors in the first place. The 87% has little meaning. Here is a fact which does: Denmark, before tax has amongst the lowest energy costs in Europe. With respect to Napiersabre - pity your comments did not do justice to one of the more interesting WWII engines. According to you (over) regulation is the problem - oddly there is a consensus that a lack of regulation was the problem with respect to the recent turmoil in the financial community. I'd love to know how regulation is destroying Euro competition? Looking at recent DG Comp cases (power equipment anybody) one senses that there is a lack of regulation. Still facts that do not fit in with your half-arsed world view will be discarded. I sense I'm talking to a Daily Mail reader - and thus engaged in a pointless dialogue. In this context I can recommend Dan&Dan Daily Mail on youtube - it made me laugh. Hint - stick to Dail Mail sites - you may find congenial company.
    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    08/08/2011
  • Life is short, and this artlice saved valuable time on this Earth.
    By :
    Sandra
    - Posted on :
    19/08/2011
  • By :
    xgnxsablqwh
    - Posted on :
    20/08/2011
  • Viagra Online 84404 cialis 360834
    By :
    Rvpglez
    - Posted on :
    23/08/2011
  • seroquel 13105 synthroid results riepox

    By :
    d4N13LJ
    - Posted on :
    26/08/2011
  • propecia 85155 valtrex =D

    By :
    n3cr0fag
    - Posted on :
    26/08/2011
  • colchicine :OO synthroid thhqx

    By :
    kicylala
    - Posted on :
    27/08/2011
  • accutane qybrh propecia 77393

    By :
    iamchuck
    - Posted on :
    29/08/2011
  • prednisone no prescription cfy manufacturer of nexium 07111

    By :
    corporalcadet
    - Posted on :
    31/08/2011
  • zovirax %OOO purchase prednisone =D

    By :
    supahova
    - Posted on :
    01/09/2011
  • valtrex pills to buy %]] seroquel for sale 8PPP

    By :
    honeychildxo
    - Posted on :
    04/09/2011
  • buy generic priligy :]] viagra 3116

    By :
    timboktoe
    - Posted on :
    13/09/2011
A windy future
Background: 

The EU has set itself a legally binding goal for 2020 of reducing its CO2 emissions by 20% and increasing the share of renewables in the energy mix by the same amount, both measured against 1990 levels.

A target of a 20% increase in energy efficiency has also been set but it is not legally enforceable. The low carbon roadmap in March this year stated that if it were met, emissions cuts would automatically rise to 25%, five percentage points above the target.

In October 2009, EU leaders endorsed a long-term target of reducing collective developed country emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. This is in line with the recommendations of the UN's scientific arm - the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - for preventing catastrophic changes to the Earth's climate.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Advertising

04 February 2013 - 07 February 2013:

Advertising