EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU court says Austrian, German gambling curbs illegal

Published 10 September 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled this week against Austrian and German state monopolies which apply restrictions on sports betting, lotteries and other games.

Ruling on three cases referred to it by the German courts on Wednesday (8 September), the European court found that while monopolies were sometimes justified, Germany's efforts to promote gambling were inconsistent with its goal of protecting consumers.

"German rules on sporting bets constitute a restriction on the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establishment," reads the ECJ's judgement.

While the Court acknowledged that such restrictions may be justified to protect the public interest, such as combating gambling addiction, it stressed that in the German case, the public monopoly does not pursue the objective of combating the dangers of gambling in a consistent and systematic manner.

Indeed, state monopolies drive intensive advertising campaigns to encourage gambling in casinos and on automated games to maximise profits, the Court noted.

"In such circumstances, the preventive objective of that monopoly can no longer be pursued, so that the monopoly ceases to be justifiable," the ECJ concluded.

Austrian law goes beyond what's necessary to fight crime and fraud

In a similar case, the ECJ yesterday (9 September) found Austria to be in breach of EU law.

The Court noted that Austrian legislation, which only allows companies with their seat in Austria to operate casinos, contravenes EU rules on the freedom of establishment and discriminates against companies with their headquarters in another member state.

It also found that excluding operators whose seat is in another member state is disproportionate, as the measure goes beyond what is necessary to fight crime and fraud.

In an earlier ruling, the Court stated that EU countries could ban online gambling if their aim was to combat fraud (EurActiv 07/06/10).

EU Green Paper being prepared

EU Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier announced in February that after years of ad-hoc rulings by the ECJ to regulate gambling in Europe, the EU executive would seek a more coherent way to address the issue (EurActiv 12/02/10).

A Green Paper on the matter is due to for publication in the coming months. Member states have not been consulted on gambling since they decided to leave the issue out of the Services Directive in 2006.

Positions: 

The ruling was welcomed by proponents of a free gambling market.

The secretary-general of the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), Sigrid Ligné, referred to the German case as a landmark ruling which will have a decisive impact on much-needed reform in Germany.

"Other member states have opened or are opening their markets and moving away from monopoly regimes to multi-operator licensing systems. They show that consumers can be better protected in a market that is both regulated and open to competition," she added.

Regarding the Austrian case, Ligné stressed that it confirms clearly that member states cannot require EU licensed online operators to be physically present on their territory.

Clive Hawkswood, chief executive of the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), added that Austria is not alone in having gambling laws and arbitrary practices that seek to protect particular local operators. "We hope that this ruling will convince other member states to introduce changes in their legislation," he said.

European Lotteries (EL), an umbrella group representing licensed national lotteries in 40 countries, said that the German the ruling did not, however, pave the way for liberalising the market.

"Contrary to how proponents of liberalisation would like to interpret these rulings, the Court today by no means advocated a liberalisation of gambling," said EL president Friedrich Stickler.

"On the contrary, the Court reminded Germany that it has to control more strictly the offer of dangerous forms of gambling, such as casino games and gaming machines. The Court also pointed again to the higher risks associated with Internet gambling," Stickler added.

Professor Siegbert Alber, senior partner of lobbying law firm Alber & Geiger, represented most of the private gambling industry during the process. He was Advocate General of the European Court of Justice in the landmark decision "Gambelli", on which the ECJ arguments now are based. He believes "that EU Commissioner Barnier will propose a new EU regulation to liberalize the European gambling market - and end the national discussions."

Background: 

While gambling activities have traditionally been strictly regulated at national level to protect consumers from addiction, fraud, money-laundering and fixed games, the exclusion of gambling activities from the EU's Services Directive has triggered numerous complaints from the gambling industry regarding access to national markets.

This has led to a number of European Court of Justice (ECJ) rulings on the issue and several Commission infringement procedures against member states to verify whether national measures limiting the cross-border supply of gambling services are compatible with EU laws guaranteeing free movement of services.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising