EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

NGO proposes 'rescue plan' for Europe's biodiversity

Published 24 May 2010 - Updated 25 May 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

On the occasion of Global Biodiversity Day, celebrated on Saturday (22 May), environmental NGO BirdLife International argued that lack of concern for biodiversity across EU policies and a shortage of funding are the main reasons for the European Union's failure to halt ecological degradation.

Despite the EU's general failure to deliver on its target of halting biodiversity loss throughout the Union by 2010, the NGO stresses that the many examples of best practice and localised success stories show that "the EU already has powerful conservation tools and, where there is political will to implement science-backed action, the results invariably follow" (EurActiv 17/12/08).

BirdLife's new report on the EU's progress towards halting biodiversity loss sets out a number of specific recommendations for resolving the biodiversity crisis. These are grouped under four main headings: governance and legislation, investing in natural capital, building green infrastructure and addressing the drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem loss.

Mainstreaming biodiversity into other policies

The BirdLife rescue plan for Europe's biodiversity underlines the need for stronger enforcement of existing EU legislation, such as the Birds and Habitats Directives. But it also suggests developing specific 2020 biodiversity strategies for key sectoral policies, such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP).

Sectoral EU strategies for the next ten years could "re-energise the process of involving stakeholders in achieving EU biodiversity policy, minimise conflicts and commit both industry and authorities to better implementation and financing," the report argues.

Consequently, more funding and new tools to improve financial streams for biodiversity protection are also needed to develop and implement new policies, the study adds.

Finally, the report suggests that efficient land-use policies are needed to ensure that new infrastructure and urban development does not lead to biodiversity loss. Biodiversity footprint considerations in product labelling and public procurement would encourage sustainable consumption and production, it adds.

Need for appropriate targets and indicators

The document also proposes a list of measurable targets and indicators, which would allow progress to be tracked throughout the EU. The report already includes a simple overview table, which uses a traffic light system to present average scores for different EU member states regarding a number of indicators.

While the countries' scores vary depending on the indicator, which are ranked from red to green, not one EU member states was given the green light for its final score.

Next steps: 
  • 2010: International Year of Biodiversity.
  • October 2010: International negotiations on new global post-2010 biodiversity vision and targets, in Nagoya, Japan.
  • By end of 2010: Commission to present EU 2020 biodiversity strategy.
  • 2010: Commission pushing for establishment of UN Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).
Background: 

According to a European Commission report on the implementation of the EU's Biodiversity Action Plan, the EU did not even come close to achieving its target of halting biodiversity loss by 2010 (EurActiv 17/12/08). 

The report states that 50% of all species and up to 80% of habitat types in need of protection in Europe have "unfavourable conservation" status, which indicates species decline. The same goes for over 40% of European bird species. 

In its January 2010 paper, the Commission outlined four policy options for EU action after 2010. EU-27 environment ministers opted in March for the strongest of the options, which calls for "halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020, and restoring them in so far as feasible, while stepping up the EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss".

This option was endorsed by EU heads of state and government in March.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising