EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU waste rules could create half million jobs, says EU environment head

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 21 May 2013, updated 10 June 2013

If European Union countries implemented existing waste-management regulations, they could create some 400,000 jobs and save diminishing resources, a senior Commission environment official said.

Speaking at the European Business Summit, Kurt Vandenberghe, the head of cabinet for Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik, said it was the job of the Commission to make clear the links between waste management and macroeconomics, calling for a phasing out of environmental subsidies.

The call from Vandenberghe is one of a number by European Commission chiefs who have claimed that carrying out existing environmental legislation will help Europe exit its economic doldrums by cutting down on energy or natural resource use.

“Business is saying we’re in crisis because of too much green tape [environmental regulation] will not help. If we’re in a crisis it is not because there was too much but too little, not in environmental legislation but in the financial markets,” he said.

“What we don’t need in Europe is new environmental regulation but we need to implement the existing [waste regulation],” he said, citing its potential to create an estimated 400,000 new jobs.

Responding to business concerns, Vandenberghe stressed that greener practices were not necessarily at odds with industrialisation.

“We don’t want de-industrialisation. We want re-industrialisation but on a new model with de-materialisation. There are studies showing this is possible and profitable.”

A number of EU businesses had already begun cutting waste and implementing recycling rules along their production chain in a drive to lower costs and go green, he said.

Cities

Vandenberghe called on European cities to “break out of their silos” and to march towards a circular economy.

“Cities play a very fundamental role in this. Soon 80% of EU citizens will be in cities. The rising population offers business opportunities but poses a problem for sustainability,” he said.

The Commission's environment directorate is exploring the EU-wide potential for good waste-management practices. In March the European Parliament Greens held a conference with Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik to explore the potential for zero-waste cities, inviting the mayor of Europe’s first such success story, the Italian municipality of Capannori.

The mayor, Giorgio DelGhingaro, said: “We do normal and concrete things, for example, the elimination of plastic bottles in school canteens, no plastic cutlery, self-composting, incentives for use of cloth diapers, distributors of milk/water on tap, and we have a Research Centre of Zero Waste for the analysis of the residual waste.”

Capannori councillors estimate that the measures have cut waste disposal costs by one-fifth compared to other municipalities.

In recent weeks the European institutions have pushed for greater awareness on waste management, holding a conference on zero-waste communities in the European Parliament and inviting the British actor Jeremy Irons to present his documentary ‘Trashed’ at the launch of a Commission green paper on waste.

Struggling to cope economically with the energy-rich United States and the rising industrial powerhouses of China and India, EU heads see resource efficiency a key driver of growth. On 29 May the EU executive will release recommendations to member states on how to cut waste and reduce the resulting tax burden.

Positions: 

Jean Félix, vice-president of the European Federation of Engineering Consultancy Associations, said: "Cities are the ideal framework for EU policies on resource efficiency. We need integration at EU level and political consensus for smart, sustainable cities."

Next steps: 
  • 29 May: European Commission to release recommendations to member states on cutting waste
Marc Hall

COMMENTS

  • Let's "produce" waste instead of normal production...

    By :
    Are they KIDDING?
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2013
  • The head of cabinet for Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik is absolutely right in his statements.

    My colleagues in the EU who have been working on this issue for the past three years and more can confirm from their own experience that there is a cloistered approach is missing a whole wrath of benefits here. These - my colleagues - have taken to task the ideas of managing and treating waste within the remit of the EU and wider strategies and have developed a whole ethos of absolute use and 100% diversion of all products contained within the waste stream away from land fill and to total economic use. This approach - you call it the circular economy, a borrowed expression from the PRC by the way - adds to the current Waste Hierarchy by allowing Reworking of the internal constituents within the waste to make beneficial products that have a more intrinsic value than they would have if left alone and "confusingly" recycled or reclaimed. Thus the proposition is higher up the Waste Hierarchy after Rethink, Reuse, and Recycle and is positioned at this point.
    Reworking means converting the inbuilt Raw Materials to make the best appropriate product that would have the best environmental outcome for the Common Good. Thus this material can be turned into the Renewable Liquid Fuels and in so doing add to the reductions in Green House Gas Emmisions. This can be done profitably and at a price that is much more beneficial than currently perceived in using the "sp-called" advanced thermal treatment (incineration/gasification/plasma-gasification) plants. Typically a facility to treat the residual wastes from Municipal Solid Waste - say 500,000 tonnes per year can be designed built and set to work and operated for a capital cost of around €110 Million and then utislise a treatment fee of less than €30-00 per tonne for 5 years after which the treatment fee would be zero costed, and in producing 100 to 120 Million litres per year of the renewable fuel Ethanol with Methanol and electricity as significant by-products (or 50 Million litres per year of the renewable fuel Butanol with Ethanol and Methanol and hydrogen and electricity also as very significant by-products the pay-off period to financiers will be less than 4 to 6 years. Such a project will employ around 150 persons (using the traditional double-manning requirements demanded in the waste industry under law and using the typical 4-shift pattern so well-established in the operations and maintenance industrial needs for such process plants.

    There is no doubt that this is the way forward but the absolute travesty of the matter is the fact that the consulting advisors serving the waste industry take no notice. You have pointed out that the current thinking would sooner have our Municipalities and the likes spend 3 to 4 times the amount and waste the Governments Money of the various EU States (oops sorry there is no such thing as Government Money, it is Tax Payers' money for Governments are mere Stewards of the Tax Payers'money) in these highly-expensive and unwanted incineration processes.

    It is all very well Mr Janez Potočnik as the head of cabinet for Environment Commissioner saying such things but then we hear nothing happen. The companies we know that have developed this process have found a complete Brick Wall of intransigence from your very own EU and EC to move to adopt such a strategy which will save the EU over €190 Billion in capital expenditure on necessary Waste Infrastructure Works by 2025 and save over €120 Billion a year in avoided Oil Imports from 2025 just by using the available wastes in society to make the renewable fuels.

    Importantly Mr Janez Potočnik this will produce a Renewable Fuel as Butanol - for example - which can be made in the EU and used in the EU with a Pump Price (inclusive of Duties and Taxation) which can be lower than €1-00 per litre as against the current Diesel (petro-based0 and gasoline (perto-based) that are variously priced across the EU at between €1-40 and €2-00 per litre.

    This company has four programmes awaiting start and financial closure across the EU from the North West through to the Mediterranean and the way that this inbuilt development is viewed from within the EU as a Green Investment Programme for Jobs is seemingly being bypassed and will by default (if the Eu is not sensible enough) be lost to the EU.

    By :
    Peter
    - Posted on :
    21/05/2013
  • The management where materials or items are, reused; refurbished; repaired; redeployed or re-manufactured along with the environmental benefits it also have social benefits to the community or charity groups and economic benefits to the businesses involved. One of the examples is a study by Khetriwal, D.S., et.al (2009) it examined the decade long experience of Switzerland in using Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) to manage its e waste. The study took Switzerland as an example to give policy makers with crucial insights of implementing EPR in e-waste management system. Recognition of an overall Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) working model or system through in-depth semi structure interviews, who’s monitoring and controlling is through hard legislation and soft peer pressure. The findings were customers charged with nominal recycling fees during buy of goods which is known as Advance Recycling Fees (ARF), those fees get stipulated between the Producer Responsibility Organizations (PRO’s) and recyclers. Producer Responsibility system is vital when disposal cost is higher than recoverable cost, moreover ARF could be used effectively to meet the differential. As this inclusive system does not differentiate brands in taking back items, this not only helps customer but also aid retail distribution network for reverse logistics and keep complexity and cost down.

    Using the waste hierarchy, these management alternatives are environmentally preferable to the widely used disposal option i.e., landfill. The players involved in these activities are manufacturers, private parties, Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), consumers and decision-makers. Moving up the waste hierarchy needs an adoption of low waste alternative behaviors.It is an observation that different audiences behave differently and most behavior is “context-specific” . For instance, consumers with stronger social conscience report a higher awareness level and sense greater responsibility in participating in the collective programmes.

    By :
    Purva Tavri
    - Posted on :
    27/05/2013
  • The comments by the Polish is very important. The comments by Peter and Purva are also important.

    I like the idea that we can turn our Waste into Fuels for my car and save €urocents 40 per litre (or more exactly here in Italy €urocents 80+ per litre!) for that would really make a difference to my bills for transport.

    Lets's see more of this.

    We are hoping to see these developments take place around the Mediterranean and I hope that this will happen soon in the Southern parts of the EU where we have really struggled with fuel costs recently.

    There is a proposals in Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Malta, Portugal and Spain to do this and I only hope that the EU helps out here as the only ""Apparent"" hold up is the devisive nature of the ridiculous political machinations of a policy of limiting renewable fuels for use as a blending requirement rather than allowing a wider blending issue. The current 10% (shortly to be increased to 20%) blending is a limitation rather than a stepping stone. This 10%/20% should be used as the floor or base for this use and not the upper boundary.

    Dear EU peoples recognise this: for too long the Waste Industry has been controlled by a monopoly of Mega Corporations like Dong-Energy (Owned by the Danish Company, by Vivendi, and WRG (part of the Spanish Group) and others like the Pennon Group, who continually ply their wares across the EU to ensure that only the very expensive options for treating wastes are laid forth. These programmes invariably use incinerators and gasification plants as the only option, and the result is thatincredible stupodity in Dublin with the Poolbeg debacle that has been festering for over 10 years. This programme for dealing with 600,000 tonnes per year of Municipal Solid Waste was defined by the local consulting engineers - from Dublin - totally directed by the Corporation to go for incineration and it was tendered by a proscribed specification so that the only bidder was Danish (the consultants were Danish, now there's a surprise!) which recorded a bid of over €360 million (currently now over €430 Million) and inordinate treatment costs )gate fees) of over €80-00 per tonne so that the financial balance could be set. Now 8 to 10 years afterwards the problem exists that Ireland which is being bailed out by the EU cannot afford it, and is seeking financial redress from the EU and International Bankers to fund it: they cannot get it. And the only Company that has made money from this is the local Consulting Engineers from Dublin who has made €100 Million in fees from it. This company has been given extensions to fees after extensions to fees without any tendering and it is now wondered why the proposal has fallen flat and out of grace. It is absolutely obvious.

    EU States and the EC Procurement office take note that there is some alleged malpractice going on here and it needs dealing with at the EU level. This is a total nonsense. You must deal with this and ensure that you pull the plug on this and censure the Gpvernment here in Ireland and the Taoiseech Enda Kenney for it is also alleged that the funds to promote the election of the current Government came from the Fees given to the Consulting Engineer.

    By :
    Jan Vladic
    - Posted on :
    27/05/2013
  • As an owner manager of a small road transport business delivering cars, my comments are as follows;

    a. we invested large sum of money to convert trucks to run on ppo produced in Ireland which has 14% unemployment, this has gone thanks to Greens and now back on imported bio diesel from where? All to save the world?

    b. wanted to grow business to deal with end of life cars which makes sense environmentally to fill empty truck? EOL car driven legally to garage immediately becomes hazardous waste, requires special training for driver, permits to cross each county in Ireland and blah blah.Just more bureaucracy.

    c. EU fails to harmonize dimensions of car transporters in Europe. We will retain 27 different sets of dimensions in a "common" market? What about the extra carbon emissions this generates?

    I think Europe needs to get a lot smarter about how every initiative it takes ends up in more bureaucracy and simply defeats the goals of competitiveness and unemployment. The EU is all about improving its citizens lives, whilst it did that in the beginning it has definitely lost its way today.!

    By :
    je
    - Posted on :
    28/05/2013
"We want re-industrialisation but on a new model with de-materialisation." Kurt Vandenberghe, European Commission head of cabinet for environment. Photo: ©LisbonCouncil
Background: 

The EU's 2005 Thematic Strategy on the Prevention and Recycling of Waste sets a long-term goal for the EU to become a recycling society that seeks to avoid waste and uses waste as a resource. 

The bloc's revised Waste Framework Directive, which should have been transposed into national law by 12 December 2010, introduces a binding 'waste hierarchy' defining the order of priority for treating waste. The waste hierarchy favours prevention of waste, followed by reuse, recycling, and recovery, with waste disposal only a last resort.

To comply with the directive, EU member states are obliged to draw up specific waste management plans after analysing their current waste management situations.

Countries are also required to establish special waste prevention programmes by the end of 2013, in a drive to break the link between economic growth and the environmental impacts associated with the generation of waste.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising