While some of the European Union’s deadliest air can be found in Bulgaria and Romania, few urban areas escape unhealthy pollutants such as particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen. Transport, energy and agriculture are the main culprits.
Jacqueline McGlade, EEA executive director, said in releasing the report that economic inefficiency and the failure of many EU countries to meet their binding commitments to reduce pollution had both health and economic consequences.
“Almost one-third of Europe’s city dwellers were exposed to excessive concentrations of airborne particulate matter,” McGlade said, adding that many EU countries were failing to meet commitments to improve air quality.
The EEA 2012 Air Quality in Europe report shows that in addition to high levels of particulate matter – smoke, dirt and dust as well as metals and toxic vehicle and industrial exhaust - some 17% of urbanites are exposed to high levels of ozone, the ground-level cocktail of pollutants that causes smog.
But the figures underscore the large gulf between what existing EU law and the World Health Organisation consider to be unhealthy. When the far more stringent WHO limits are applied, the figure for EU city dwellers rises above 80% for particulate matter and 97% for ozone.
The EEA report also shows 7% of urban residents are exposed to nitrogen dioxide levels above the EU’s recommendations. Nitrogen and ozone levels affect more than human health, damaging vegetation, soil, water and even buildings, experts say.
Poor air quality has widespread human health and environmental effects, contributing to respiratory problems, damaging plants and contributing to corrosion of buildings. Some studies say bad air causes nearly 500,000 premature deaths per year in the EU – 0.1% of the bloc’s population – while the EEA contends that shifting to electric vehicles and other anti-pollution measures could cut the toll to 230,000 by 2020.
McGlade said there are economic consequences as well, estimating that the pricetag for bad air is €630 billion for health care €169 billion in lost productivity.
“In essence, we’re paying for inefficient facilities through our health,” she told in releasing the report at the European Parliament.
The new report also shows that while some pollutants remain stubbornly high, there has been headway in cutting emissions. Levels of sulphur dioxide (SO2), one of the most pernicious pollutants for human and ecological health, have plummeted 82% since 1990 thanks to more stringent smokestack scrubbing requirements. Carbon monoxide (CO) fell -62 %; non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs), –56 %; nitrogen oxides (NOx), –47 %; and ammonia (NH3), –28 %. Emissions of fine particulate matter have fallen by 15 % since 2000.
In a further bid to reduce pollutants, the European Parliament recently approved legislation to slash sulphur levels in shipping fuels, a move environmentalists say will help prevent thousands of premature deaths especially in coastal areas. The new measures put the EU in line with the upper limit of 0.5% sulphur content in fuels set by the International Maritime Organisation and will apply in principle to all EU seas by 2020. The previous limit was 3.5%.
The EU environment agency’s recent studies show air quality challenges across the EU. Some of Europe’s wealthiest countries - including Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Luxembourg and Sweden – exceed international ceilings for leading sources of pollution. Middle-income nations like Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary – which have a high dependence on coal, industrial output or older industrial operations – continue to lead the EU in sulphur emissions.
Janez Potočnik, the EU environment commissioner, acknowledged that many national governments were failing to address violations and that the Commission is taking infringement action to address non-compliance.
“Member states have insisted on flexibility in applying air quality legislation,” he said at the release of the EEA report at the European Parliament. “This has unfortunately not led to better implementation. Too often the response has rather been too late.”
Call for tougher standards
Health organisations are pressuring the European Commission to keep this in mind as it prepares any revisions to the 2008 air quality directive that are expected by 2013. The European Environmental Bureau, a campaign group, is pressing for stricter guidelines on pollution, in line with WHO standards.
The following compares the WHO and EU pollution thresholds for humans measured as micrograms per cubic meter:
- Ozone (O3): WHO per 8-hour period, 100; EU, 120
- Particular matter 10, or PM10 (smoke, dirt and dust form coarse particles): WHO annually, 20; EU, 40.
- Particulate matter 2.5, or PM2.5 (metals and toxic exhaust from smelting, vehicles, power plants and refuse burning forming fine particles): WHO annually, 10; EU (as of 2015), 25
- Sulphur dioxide (SO2): WHO daily, 20; EU, 125
- Carbon monoxide (CO): WHO and EU, 10 for an 8-hour period.
While environmentalists call for further steps to improve air quality, efforts to cut pollution can be politically complicated. For example, EU policies that encourage the use of diesel engines to cut greenhouse gas emissions contribute to higher nitrogen levels.
In addition, most EU countries have spotty records at enforcing the European Commission’s 2008 air quality directive. Pressure to create economic growth in the face of the finance and sovereign debt crises, and receding economies, creates pressure to overlook policies that might crimp growth.
Last year, the UN Human Development Report showed that Bulgaria leads Europe in the intensity of air pollution, ranking in the top one-quarter of the most polluted of the 187 countries in the report. Romania and Bulgaria are also global leaders in mortality rates from poor air quality - 439 deaths per million people compared to 437 in Bulgaria.
Worldwide, only Armenia has a higher annual mortality rate than the two EU countries – 882 per million population in a country of 3 million people.