EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

When does an e-bike become a motorcycle?

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 21 November 2012, updated 22 November 2012

The European Parliament has voted to separate regulation on motorised and non-motorised bicycles, a move two-wheeler associations say will safeguard investment in cycling.

In the plenary session, European lawmakers decided on Tuesday (20 November) that any electronically power assisted cycle (EPAC) under 250 watts and a maximum speed of 25 kilometres per hour would remain a bicycle.

Anything more powerful is considered a motorbike, in line with the European Commission’s original proposal.

Ceri Woolsgrove, road safety officer for the European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF), said: “We need a clear border line between what a bicycle is and what exceeds the definition of a ‘bicycle’.”

“This is important for clear decisions on the use of infrastructure and facilities for bicycles that authorities have to make on the international, national, regional and local level.”

A total of 643 MEPs voted in favour, with 16 against and 18 abstentions. A decision in the other direction would have subjected cyclists to a host of motorbike-style regulations, such as mandatory helmets, vehicle licence fees and compulsory insurance.

“You don’t want to damage the reputation of cycling, and lose all the wonderful benefits that cyclists’ have,” Woolsgrove said.

The Council of Ministers, representing the 27 EU member states, still needs to ratify the proposal, but this is considered a formality following months of debate.

Under current legislation e-bikes, also known as pedelecs, have seen remarkable success in Europe, with over 700,000 units sold in 2011. There are already one million e-bikes in use in Germany alone, with 310,000 sold last year. The figures for electric cars pale in comparison, with just 11,500 vehicles sold in Western Europe last year despite large subsidies.

There have been calls for pedelecs of any power output to be exempt from so-called Type Approval, the procedure which ascertains whether a motorised vehicle meets minimum regulatory, technical and safety requirements.

Some countries subject bicycles to legislation, such as Australia where it is illegal to ride without a helmet. Earlier this year, British cyclist Bradley Wiggins backed calls for similar legislation in the UK, following the death of a cyclist in a collision with a bus in central London.

“Ultimately, if you get knocked off and you ain't got a helmet on, then how can you kind of argue,” he said.

Positions: 

Brussels-based bicycle and accessories manufacturer associations COLIBI and COLIPED said in a joint statement: "This positive vote will enhance further investments and developments in the industry and will support the European EPAC manufacturers in their continuous effort to bring high-end and above all safe products on the market."

Marc Hall

COMMENTS

  • Most serious cyclists do where helmets , cycling in a big city it's wise wear a helmet .
    In my view there is too much regulation of trivial matters at an EU level , that should be decided in individual countries .
    Bicyclists should be subject to the rules of the road , in Britain they are ; but in some other countries they are treated as pedestrians allowed to ride on the pavement or in pedestrian precicts .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    24/11/2012
  • Dear David

    Things may be not so simple. A Bicycle is a vehicle, but it has no engine. This makes a big difference. Not all rules which apply to motor vehicles have still sense when they are applied to bicycles. Ultimately What makes the difference? To have wheels or to have an engine? Or, in other words, What make cars to be potentially dangerous for pedestrians and other users of the road? To have wheels or to have a powerful engine? If the answer is "to have wheels", same rules must be applied, for instance, to cars and to handicapped chairs.

    Of course, bicyclists should not be treated as pedestrians (I don't know any country which is doing that presently), but I do not think they should be treated as motorists (and, unfortunately, many countries still do that and too many people still think in this way).

    By :
    Ricardo Marques
    - Posted on :
    25/11/2012
  • I am so disappointed in this legislation, and can only hope that it doesn't set a precedent for the United States to follow.

    I ride a Madsen cargo cycle throughout hilly San Francisco, hauling my three boys up some serious hills. I NEED every bit of the 350w my BionX motor gives me to do this!! The Madsen is so long, it rattles and bounces over bumps, and the chain derails if things get too bumpy - there is NO WAY I would ride aggressively in this bike, but I need the 350w power simply to use it. Being able to accelerate quickly is what allows me to ride more safely, because I have no incentive to roll through stop signs. I can fully stop, and then clearly accelerate when it's my turn, avoiding confusion with other cars. The ability to accelerate makes my riding SAFER, not more dangerous. I am so confused and disappointed by this legislation and failure to accommodate people who need to carry cargo or kids.

    Luckily (or not) biking isn't as popular in the US yet, so hopefully such silly legislation is a long way off.

    By :
    Laura Swaminathan
    - Posted on :
    25/11/2012
  • Actually, David Barneby, most regular, workaday cyclists in cycling-friendly cities and countries do not wear helmets. They are almost unknown in Amsterdam, where I travel to at least twice a year. Helmets are more common among athletes and people training at higher speeds. Unless you think only athletes are "serious" cyclists? The point in bicycle advocacy is to get people of all ages and almost all physical conditions cycling.

    Laura, very hilly cities such as SF are a special case; I've found the electric scooters that are sold as "bicycles" very intimidating on the paths here in Montréal. I agree that power may not be the only factor - scooters are dangerous on bicycle paths because of the weight of the vehicle. Very different from a cargo bike with a motor.

    By :
    Maria Soriano
    - Posted on :
    26/11/2012
Is this a bicylce or a motorbike? (Photo: ECF)
Background: 

The European Commission's Green Paper on urban mobility in 2007 suggested that cycling should become an integral part of urban transport policies.

On several occasions, the then-transport commissioner, Antonio Tajani, said that he would introduce measures to promote bicycling in Europe’s cities in the EU’s Urban Mobility action plan of 2009.

However, when it arrived, there were none. To encourage safe cycling, the EU is funding cycling infrastructure, via its Structural and Cohesion Funds. In the period 2007-2013, an estimated budget of €600 million was allotted for investments in cycling infrastructure across the bloc.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Transport Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising