On Tuesday (10 July), the European Parliament backed a reform which it is hoped would increase efficiency and competition as airports become saturated.
"It is vital that we tackle this new demand," said Italian Giommaria Uggias, the MEP responsible for compiling the report.
Regulators would impose a ‘use it or lose it’ policy and sanctions for airlines that abuse slot allocation.
Under the proposed legislation, airlines would also pay a ‘remuneration fee’ for occupying a slot over a period of time to avoid monopolies and larger airlines ‘sitting’ on slots.
Uggias said airlines could also buy and trade slots, with an impartial regulatory body would be put in place to ensure a fair market.
British MEP Phil Bennion (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe), warned that regional airlines could be threatened by the open market.
Bennion said smaller aircraft from the outlying regions could potentially be frozen out of airport hubs by larger airlines that had bought up all available slots.
However, Uggias said regulations would be put in place to deal with a potential “freezing out” scenario, enabling coordinators to “refuse the confirmation of the sale of a slot if it is considered that this may impair regional connectivity with major European hubs.”
British MEP Jacqueline Foster (European Conservatives and Reformists) dismissed the idea of such a “market failure”.
“Most slots for intercontinental airlines need feeder aircraft from smaller peripheral regions,” she said, adding that “freezing out wouldn’t be a good business model.”
In any case, under the Uggias proposal the market for slots would not be entirely open.
“We must stress the public utility of slots, whose allocation should not be possible without mediation between the public interest and the airlines individual needs”, he said.
German MEP Michael Cramer (Greens/European Free Alliance) said liberalisation and competitiveness offered the most sustainable model for the slot market.
He claimed Europe was undergoing an “artificial aviation boom” due to tax breaks and other incentives for EU airlines.
Cramer said that a low-budget airline model where passengers can “fly for the price of a taxi” was not sustainable, claiming that without a proper market economy, high running costs would lead “sooner or later to a collapse”.
“Airlines need a market economy,” he said.
Uggias said that the European aviation industry needed to respond to competition from outside the EU, such as the rapidly growing Asian-Pacific market.
Single European Sky
The Parliament's transport committee voted Tuesday (10 July) calling for the Commission to prod EU members states to meet their Single European Sky (SES) commitments. Slow progress on SES "carries high economic and environmental costs", said German ALDE MEP Gesine Meissner.
Meissner said that the potential growth of Europe's aviation industry was being hampered by countries' failure to create functional airspace blocks, or FABs, and to open up military airspace to civilian traffic.
"Today flights quite often don't take the most direct route but fly zigzag routes because airspace is often reserved for military use", she said.
Meissner said member states had failed to meet SES legislative targets such as trans-national air traffic control cooperation, and an 'EU performance scheme' aimed at establishing shorter flight routes and fewer delays for air traffic control services.
Meissner lamented the resulting economic and environmental costs.
"The implications of this delay are tangible: billions of euros, thousands of jobs and millions of tons of CO2 unnecessarily wasted", she said.
EP Foster also called on the EU to upgrade technology and improve efficiency in the use of airspace as outlined in the draft resolution, which she compiled, as soon as possible "to avoid the consumer having to pay twice: in time and price".