EU agrees draft plan for aviation emissions

  

The European Union on Tuesday (4 March) reached a preliminary deal on a law that will exempt long-haul flights from paying for carbon emissions until 2016, EU sources said.

The deal is a further weakening of the bloc's stance following immense international pressure and threats of a trade war.

The sources said negotiators from the European Parliament, the European Commission, and the EU presidency, representing member states, had tentatively agreed that an existing suspension of EU law for intercontinental flights should be extended.

A meeting of EU diplomats representing member states is expected to debate the deal and possibly endorse it on Friday.

A spokesman for the European Commission had no immediate comment.

Environmentalists were swift to criticise Tuesday's outline deal and called on the European Parliament to reject it.

Without parliament's approval, the original law, covering the length of intercontinental flights into EU airports, would reapply, raising the risk of a new outbreak of trade threats.

EU diplomatic sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the agreement would maintain a suspension of the law for intercontinental flights until 2016, with a provision to revert back to making all aviation pay for allowances in 2017 if a global deal on curtailing aviation emissions cannot be agreed.

"With today's deal, European governments have conceded again to international pressure without getting anything meaningful in return, let alone guarantees that soaring international aviation emissions will one day be tackled," said Bill Hemmings, aviation manager at campaign group Transport & Environment.

Together with the European Green party, he urged the European Parliament to reject the deal.

"It is reckless to dismantle this effective climate policy instrument in exchange for a vague promise on a global scheme in the distant future," said Satu Hassi, climate change spokeswoman for the Greens.

An EU law on requiring all aviation using EU airports to pay for their emissions by buying allowances on the EU Emissions Trading System led to threats of an international trade war.

Non-EU nations, including the United States, India and China, accused the European Union of breaching rules of sovereignty and threatened retaliation.

Eventually the Commission agreed to suspend the law for intercontinental flights, but on condition a global alternative was drawn up. The law has always remained for intra-EU flights.

The UN's International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in October agreed it would deliver a global plan to curb airline emissions by 2016 for implementation in 2020.

The Commission's response was to propose amended legislation just charging aircraft for emissions in EU airspace, rather than for the entire flight.

But that too prompted international criticism and leading EU members Britain, France and Germany proposed it should be scrapped, paving the way for Tuesday's watered down deal.

Timeline: 
  • March 2014: Vote in the European Parliament's plenary session
External links: 
Advertising

Comments

Jeff Gazzard's picture

Green Finnish MEP Satu Hassi has this appalling cave-in to vested interests right - why would the European Parliament vote to cede control over Europe's climate protection policies to either Beijing or Toulouse and hope to retain any credibility as Europe's lead democratic institution? The 3 key Member States,France, Germany and the UK, have swallowed the Airbus/Chinese joint lobbying strategy that Airbus aircraft and European engine orders are under threat - is there anyone out there that truly believes the Chinese are going to switch these orders for just one model in the Airbus range to Boeing with all the cost penalties and strategic geo-politics involved? Of course not! It's a construct, pure and simple.

And again, as Ms Hassi points out, and European Voice reporter Dave Keating, has previously and insightfully covered, relying on the totally ineffective, producer-captured ICAO to develop a global policy to control and reduce aviation's climate-changing CO2 emissions is risible nonsense.

Let's hope that MEPs repeat the significant majority vote that passed the original EU ETS Aviation legislation when this craven France, Germany and UK-inspired sell-out comes before them soon. Fingers crossed!

Jeff Gazzard
Board Member
Aviation Environment Federation
LONDON