EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Parliament calls for EU-wide truckers' fines

Published 19 May 2010 - Updated 16 June 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

The European Parliament yesterday (18 May) called for EU-wide rules to fine truckers who break existing health and safety regulations. Supporters of the motion claimed it would improve safety on EU roads, while opponents argued that MEPs were trying to interfere with a strictly national issue.

The vote is the second major Parliament move relating to European truckers in less than a month, following an April 2010 decision to include lorry drivers in the EU's Road Transport Workers Directive (see 'Background').

Yesterday's motion – an own-initiative report which carries no legal obligations – arose due to major differences in how EU member states punish truck drivers who exceed legal limits governing the number of hours they spend or the distance they cover criss-crossing the continent.

Truckers who manipulate their tachograph (a device measuring time and distance driven) are penalised with a fine of up to €586 in Lithuania, €2,460 in Poland, €4,601 in Spain and €6,232 in Italy, while in France fines can be as high as €30,000, with the additional possibility of imprisonment of up to one year.

Austrian centre-right MEP Hella Ranner produced the report on this issue, and told EurActiv by phone from Strasbourg that harmonised EU rules were required because with current disparities, some truckers exploit the comparatively small fines in various member states by breaking more rules and taking greater risks.

Making these "necessary and important" changes will ensure European roads are safer, she argued.

Conservatives say 'no'

Unlike the more politically divisive debate on the Road Transport Workers exemption (see 'Background'), all the major groups in the European Parliament – right and left alike – backed the Ranner report, with the sole exception of the UK Tory-dominated European Conservatives and Reformists group (ECR).

The ECR's lead MEP on the report, UK member Philip Bradbourn, argued that setting fines and penalties should remain a matter for national governments, adding that "the Parliament is sending out a worrying statement of intent".

Speaking to EurActiv, a representative from Bradbourn's office explained that in the ECR's view, the Ranner proposals are "unrealistic and unworkable".

In this area, "one size does not fit all," they argued, adding that the ECR "expects it to collapse – there are too many holes in it".

While Ranner did concede that this is a "difficult issue," she nonetheless added that she expects a proposal from the European Commission by the end of 2010, and added that her own report should form the basis for this document.

While ultimate authority will remain with EU member states, Ranner believes the EU institutions have enough clout in this area to exert pressure on the EU 27 to harmonise their rules. However, the ECR argues that this is impossible, as the disparities in overall wealth between member states will inevitably be reflected in the maximum fines they can impose.

Positions: 

Austrian centre-right MEP Hella Ranner, author of the European Parliament report, argued that "the penalty systems in the EU member states have evolved historically and therefore show wide disparities, with fines in extreme cases that can be as much as 10 times higher in one country than in another".

She added that "these differences can be explained by economic and geographical factors as well as the member states' differing policy approaches to road safety."

Ranner concluded that "in order to achieve further approximation of the types of penalties and of the level of fines we need better coordination at European level".

ECR MEP Philip Bradbourn (UK) said that while "it may be true that fines vary from country to country […] national governments should determine the level at which a fine will act as a deterrent". "Road fines may seem relatively innocuous; however the EU should not venture any further towards deciding the penalties that our judicial system should enforce. The Parliament is sending out a worrying statement of intent," he added.

Background: 

Regulating the working conditions and behaviour of lorry drivers in the EU has been a divisive issue in recent years.

The main bone of contention has been whether to include self-employed truck drivers in the controversial EU Directive on Road Transport Workers, or to give it its full title, the "organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities" Directive.

The European Commission believes self-employed truckers should be excluded from the directive, as it is unfair to subject them to the same rules as truckers employed by companies who must limit their working time.

According to the European Parliament, before the June 2009 European elections, a majority of MEPs were in favour of including them in the directive but the current, more right-leaning Parliament has been more divided on the issue, with many MEPs supporting the Commission's position.

In April 2010, a report by Slovakian centre-right MEP Edit Bauer, calling for the exclusion of self-employed truck drivers, was voted down by the Parliament's employment committee, following a heated debate.

Bauer claimed the vote was a "mistake" and claimed the result was due to an "astonishing campaign of misinformation" by misguided EU trade unions.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising