EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Smaller airlines say EU timeslot plan will kill jobs

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 31 January 2012, updated 01 February 2012

Regional airlines are challenging the European Commission’s proposals to revamp the way flight landing and takeoff timeslots are allocated, alleging that measures now under consideration by the European Parliament would cost jobs and harm smaller carriers.

Industry groups representing regional airlines and business flight services are calling for changes to the Commission’s “Better Airports” package, which seeks to improve efficiency and reduce chronic congestion at some of Europe’s most crowded hubs.

Simon McNamara, deputy director general of the European Regions Airline Association (ERA), said yesterday (30 January) that passenger carriers would lose under the proposed overhaul of the 19-year-old slot allocation system.

“If this proposal goes through, it’s more than likely that non-EU operators will be the ones who will benefit, and the EU operators big and small are likely to be impacted,” McNamara said.

The EU executive’s airports package, released in December, calls for improvements in efficiency to ward off what it calls a “capacity crunch” created by an expected doubling of flights by 2030. It calls for binding proposals aimed at:

  • Changing how arrival and departure slots are managed and allocated;
  • Setting higher EU-wide standards and requirements for baggage handlers not employed by the airports directly or by airlines;
  • Setting operating restrictions to reduce noise pollution.

The slot issue is particularly contentious because it affects airlines as well as business jet operators and their access to seasonal landing rights.

The Commission proposals would open up slots to bidding and alter the current system of pooled slots granted for winter or summer travel seasons based on usage. Currently, airlines that use a slot 80% of the time during one season can carry that over to the next season, and the EU executive wants to up the figure to 85%.

Advocates of changing the current system say it encourages waste - in order to preserve precious slots at major airports, airlines will often fly nearly-empty aircraft during holidays or off-season to preserve prime landing and takeoff rights during peak travel times.

Fears of bidding wars

But ERA and other trade groups contend that the changes would harm business jets that do not fly regularly to airports and hurt EU airlines – particularly smaller carriers that operate on tighter margins - by opening slots to bidding wars with international competitors.

A recent study by ERA and the European Business Aviation Association said adjusting the existing system would do little to reduce congestion and said EU and national leaders should focus instead on improving air traffic control coordination across Europe, and making design changes on the ground to improve runway traffic flow.

The study also says that rather than creating employment - a central promise of EU leaders at their 30 January summit - it would cost 10,000 jobs. The study says small airports and airlines that have smaller fleets and don’t serve high-volume markets outside the EU would be hit the hardest.

“The Parliament should be starting a discussion about airport capacity in Europe and about how it can actually increase, because that is going to be good for Europe as a whole in the long term,” McNamara said in a telephone interview.

“Just tinkering around now with the capacity is not a long-term solution for air services in Europe.”

The Association of European Airlines, which represents some of Europe’s largest flag carriers, has also expressed concerns about altering slot rules, saying changes would lead to a new layers of rules without reducing congestion.

Airports at Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, London’s Gatwick and Heathrow, Milan, and Paris’ Orly and Charles de Gaulle face some of the worst traffic jams, according to a Commission report. The EU executive estimates that by 2030, up to half of passenger and cargo flights could be delayed because of congestion at 19 main airports.

ERA argues that regional airports – those handling short-haul flights between national or EU cities – are already threatened by growing demand at hub airports – growth driven by non-EU airlines.

Flights from 12 leading European airports to other regional cities fell 11% between 2002 and 2011 while flights by non-EU carriers rose an overall 59%, according to the industry study.

Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas presented the airport proposals to the European Parliament’s transport committee on 25 January, where concerns were raised about proposals for trading slots.

Kallas, in announcing the airports package on 1 December, said the current system is not flexible enough to handle rising air traffic. “These new rules will make it easier for airlines to buy and sell slot capacity, making for a more efficient slot allocation on the ground,” he said in a statement.

Positions: 

"The importance of non-scheduled operations is barely acknowledged by the EC's proposal," Fabio Gamba, chief executive of the European Business Aviation Association in Brussels, said in a statement.

"The reality is that our historical rights and investments at primary and secondary airports have been totally disregarded. In consequence, our gradual marginalisation will have a negative impact on businesses and local communities during a time of great social and economic uncertainty. Solving the capacity crunch cannot be done to the detriment of a crucial part of the economy; it must incorporate it."

Simon McNamara, deputy director general of the European Regions Airline Association, urged Parliament to take a tough line on the EU executive’s proposals.

“Any proposal to change regulation or try and change the types of operators that use slot airports is not going to actually deliver new capacity which is what Europe needs … and that doesn’t just have to be building new runways. It can be looking at using the current facilities better from an operational point of view. It’s about getting maximum usage out of runways, it’s about making minor infrastructure changes to taxiways to airport design, to allow faster through-put, it’s about looking at air traffic management and improving through-put to airports.

“The Commission can’t compel states to look at their infrastructure, but it can act as a catalyst and a sort of facilitator for that,” he said in a telephone interview.

European Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas, in a statement sent by his office, defended the proposals against the claims made by the two carrier associations in their study.

"The methodology used by the Commission to assess the impact of the changes to the slot regulation is solid. In particular, the quantified impacts on the airports selected as a representative sample have been adjusted according for each of these airports, in accordance with their characteristics (such as size, mix of traffic, level of congestion).

"The documents presented by ERAA and EBAA do not reveal any figures to back up the claim that there would be a net loss of jobs in the EU as a result of the proposed changes to the regulation or that there would be a net loss of economic benefits. Moreover the ERAA/EBAA report seems to imply that flights to and from regional airports operated by non-EU airlines do not provide benefits to the regions concerned."

Timothy Spence
Background: 

The European Commission on 1 December 2011 released its "Better Airports" package to improve the efficiency on the ground at European airports. It focuses on amending 1993 rules on timeslots as well as standards on baggage handling and noise across the EU.

Those efforts focus on the ground while in the air, the Single European Sky seeks to to improve flight efficiency by the end of 2012 through the operation of nine air control blocks that transcend national borders. It also calls for greater coordination through Eurocontrol, an air safety organisation representing the EU and a number of other countries.

The EU also wants countries to work toward standardisation of flight data exchanges and communications to improve productivity – but also provide faster response in times of emergency or inclement weather.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Transport Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising