EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Cameron faces eurosceptic backlash over new Brussels ambassador

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 September 2013

An influential committee in the British Parliament will this week complain about the appointment of Ivan Rogers as Britain's permanent representative to the European Union in Brussels after its attempts to ‘vet’ him were rebuffed.

Sir Jon Cunliffe, the UK’s permanent representative to the EU, is leaving Brussels to join the Bank of England as deputy governor. Ivan Rogers, currently working as Prime Minister David Cameron’s adviser on Europe and global issues, was yesterday (4 September) formally named as Cunliffe’s replacement, starting in November.

Rogers will be taking over at a delicate time in the UK's relations with the EU, with Cameron seeking to repatriate powers from Brussels to London, and his party pledging an in/out referendum on EU membership in 2017.

MP Bill Cash, the chairman of the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee, wrote to Cameron requesting that his committee question Rogers in advance of his appointment.

Cash said that since the post of permanent representative involves legislative decision-making that comes under the remit of his committee, “it is an issue of accountability to Parliament”.

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague replied to the committee refusing the request on the grounds that there were never pre-appointment hearings for ambassadors in the UK.

William Hague's response unsatisfactory

Cash – a leading conservative eurosceptic – told EurActiv yesterday that his committee was not satisfied that Rogers had been appointed without giving the committee the chance to interview him, and said that Hague’s letter ignored the important discretionary powers of the permanent representative in Brussels compared to other ambassadors.

Cash said that the committee - which met yesterday when it discussed the issue - would write to the government to complain that its request had been rebuffed, refused to be drawn on what actions it may take, but stressed that the group had the right to summon witnesses to appear before it if necessary.

Cash added that he believed that the UK parliament’s liaison committee – another influential body which consists of the chairmen of all the other committees – was also dissatisfied with the development.

Ivan Rogers is credited with strengthening the UK’s relations with Germany in recent months, a critical relationship if Cameron is to succeed in his aim of repatriating significant powers from Brussels.

His background is sensitive within the Conservative party’s eurosceptic wing, however. In the 1990s he worked as chief of staff to the vice-president of the European Commission, Lord Leon Brittan, and he previously worked as a political private secretary to Kenneth Clarke, the then chancellor of the exchequer.

Both Brittan and Clarke are seen as figurehead pro-Europeans within the Conservative party.

Next steps: 
  • 1 November 2013: Ivan Rogers takes up appointment as UK permanent representative in Brussels
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Bill (expenses) Cash is a most amusing character. I'm puzzled that he was re-elected given his highly "original" approach to claiming (fiddling?) his parlimentary expenses. Having said that, there is nothing wrong with Cash-by-name/Cash by nature & his committee interviewing the next UK perm rep. Perhaps it should be televised?

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    05/09/2013
  • I have no problem with Mr Rogers being questioned by the liaison committee or European Scrutiny Committee. It all adds to transparency and will probably be televised and also available on BBC catch up and Democracy Live.

    I am however aware as a Euro-sceptic and realist that only political anoraks will view it. It will not challenge the viewing figures of 'East Enders' or 'Coronation Street'. The man in the street is only likely to hear about it if the Red Top papers report on it.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    06/09/2013
  • It is inevitable we hear these moans; I expect the only appointment acceptable to Mr Cash is probably that of himself. Were that so it would be a helpful measure for the UK government to appoint a representative of Bill's stature.
    I believe he would learn much from the real position of the UK in isolation in the world and indeed would do his best to ensure that the UK plays an influential role in the European institutions - insteead of 'nockin-em' all the time.

    By :
    Roberto
    - Posted on :
    06/09/2013
  • Why do we need an ambassador in Brussells anyway, we have a load of MEP's who should be looking after our national interests not those of foreign countries.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    06/09/2013
  • I hear MPs say William Haig is a nice chap , such a good fellow . To my way of thinking as a politician and Foreign Secretary he is a total disaster . I can well see how he failed as leader of the Conservative Party .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    07/09/2013
  • "Bill Cash"
    Excellent name for an eurosceptic British politician.
    As if he openly tell the truth: "I'm paid for my euroscepticism by big British corporations which don't want to play fair"

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • Bill Cash was my local MP before they changed the constituency boundaries he was always an extremely capable local MP, and his anti eussr stance has always been open and frank, he was by profession a lawyer.

    I see that you are paid for your euroscepticism by Big British corporations Otto. In future perhaps you should repay some of that money.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • Of course, Mr.Cash was always an extremely capable MP, especially in the UKssr!
    With this extremely capable MP one can do almost everything in the British Parliament!

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • As usual Otto you have it wrong Bill Cash, like anyone else has never lived in your made up country. Maybe you should by a better Atlas then you will find that the country you refer to doesn't exist.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • There are no "EUssr" either.

    You don't like then someone call your country all sorts of names, do you?
    I don't like such things too.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • Th eussr is not a nation, so how can you dislike your nation being called names by referring to it?

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • The UK is not a nation too.
    It's only week conglomeration of 4 real nations, and its 300 years of being are nothing from historical point of view (compare: over 3000 years of China's statehood).

    The only big difference between the UK and the EU - the level of maturity. If you are young enough, you will see the true European nation with all features of statehood in your lifetime.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • You really do not understand anything of value do you Otto, you would make a very good commissioner, they can't see any further than the end of their noses either. I will never see a true eussr nation in my lifetime because it will never exist.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • No arguments, only emotions.
    Typical europhobe from the UKssr.

    By :
    Otto
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
  • Well it is better to have arguments the eussr is a known to be corruption ridden democratically deficient entity, I love my country, than to be a dumb traitor who believes the rubbish they are told by the people who are the few that benefit from it, the well overpaid people who work for the eussr against the wishes of the people. Typical of the dumb ass europhiles. As I keep telling you the UK is not the same place as your imaginary UKSSR.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    08/09/2013
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
UK Foreign Secretary William Hague replied to the committee refusing the request to 'vet' Ivan Rogers
Background: 

A potential British exit from the European Union came to the top of the political agenda after Prime Minister David Cameron said that Britain must use the upheaval created by the eurozone crisis to forge a new relationship with the European Union.

In January, Cameron promised to offer Britons a simple ‘in/out’ referendum choice on whether to stay in the European Union if he wins the next election, scheduled for 2015.

Britain has negotiated a number of opt-outs from key EU policy areas since its accession in 1973. The country is not part of the eurozone and has not signed the free-border Schengen Treaty and does not want to abide by a number of EU police and judicial cooperation rules.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 2

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising