EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Irish presidency will do all it can to avoid a ‘Brexit’

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 09 January 2013, updated 10 January 2013

Ireland vowed to be honest broker and do whatever it can to avoid a British exit from EU membership, which is now at the top of the EU political agenda after Prime Minister David Cameron said that Britain must use the upheaval created by the eurozone crisis to forge a new relationship with the European Union.

“We have a very strong interest in Britain not just remaining, but being at the heart of the European Union,” Irish Deputy Prime Minister Eamon Gilmore told a news conference in Dublin on Tuesday (8 January), a week after Ireland has assumed the presidency of the EU.

David Cameron’s intention to rewrite the EU rule book to reflect Britain’s domestic interests will not be accepted and it would ultimately lead to the break-up of the 27-countries bloc, Gilmore said.

“The European Union is not an à la carte project,” he added, stressing that the terms of membership have to be the same for all member states.

Lucinda Creighton, Ireland’s Europe minister, said if there is a country that can help bridge the gap between the EU and the UK, it is Ireland.

“Ireland with the presidency is in a good position to act as an honest broker and to act as a friend to the UK,” said Creighton, adding that it is in Ireland’s interest to ensure that UK continues a constructive membership in the European Union.

Shift away from the continent

With the onset of the eurozone crisis and the need for further economic and political integration, Cameron’s Conservatives have increasingly sought to loosen Britain’s ties and asked to renegotiate the Union’s treaties. Some favour an outright British exit from the EU with a turn towards strengthening economic ties with Commonwealth countries and the United States.

Britain has negotiated a number of opt-outs from key EU policy areas since its accession in 1973. The country is not part of the eurozone and has not signed the free-border Schengen Treaty and does not want to abide by a number of EU police and judicial cooperation rules.

That has prompted Brussels to rebuff London on a few occasions. In an end-of-the-year address, European Council President Herman Van Rompuy said that the UK’s quest to claw back powers from Brussels could inflict immense damage on the single market.

"If every member state were able to cherry pick those parts of existing policies that they most like, and opt out of those that they least like, the union in general, and the single market in particular, would soon unravel," Van Rompuy told the daily Guardian.

Cameron is to deliver a landmark speech in mid-January to mark the 40th anniversary of Britain's EU membership. He might then offer a hint on whether he will call for a referendum on staying or leaving.

According to a YouGov poll earlier this year, 67% of Britons said they favoured "holding a referendum on Britain's relationship with Europe within the next few years".

Irish role

Although the Irish presidency will not take a stance on the referendum, Creighton stressed there is a lot of work that can be done in the interim to build trust and deepen the engagement between the UK and the EU.

“I think this the role for the Irish presidency to enable this debate,” Creighton said.

And Ireland has experience when it comes to holding referendums on European matters, as all EU treaties where sovereignty issues arise must be put to a referendum. This has given rise to multiple referendums, most recently the one on the Fiscal Stability Treaty, which was backed by voters last June.

Positions: 

Ten British business leaders - including Virgin Group founder Richard Branson and Chris Gibson-Smith, chairman of the London Stock Exchange - warned Prime Minister David Cameron that he risks hurting Britain's businesses if he proposes a wholesale renegotiation of Britain's EU membership.

"To call for such a move in these circumstances would be to put our membership of the EU at risk and create damaging uncertainty for British business, which are the last things the prime minister would want to do. We need a strong reformed EU with Britain at the heart of it," said the letter, published in today's Financial Times.

Next steps: 
  • Mid-January: UK Prime Minister David Cameron to deliver 40th anniversary speech
  • 2015: UK general elections
Daniela Vincenti from Dublin

COMMENTS

  • Had the Irish Deputy minister done his homework and examined what an Irish scholar wrote about EU and its future, 70 years before the EU was born, he would have advised the Irish people to leave the EU.

    Secodly, European leaders have ignored the critical advice Schuman and Adenauer offered concerning the survival of the European project. The euro may be saved, however the EU cannot be saved.

    By :
    Francis
    - Posted on :
    09/01/2013
  • The Irish would do better to encourage Cameron to make a formal request to exit the EU, leaving us to get on with normal business. The EU exports more to Norway and Switzerland than it does to Britain so no great loss. Time to get on with strengthening the EU's military capability and working out a relationship with Turkey.

    By :
    Patrick
    - Posted on :
    09/01/2013
  • Britain; Get OUT! ASAP Thank you!

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    10/01/2013
  • Let's begin by revoking all opt-outs and rebates.
    If Cameron wants to brexit and rule the waves, so be it.

    but I forgot... big brother from the other side of the pond has spoken, so Cameron will just pretend to be negociating.

    By :
    Jean-Paul
    - Posted on :
    11/01/2013
  • David Cameron is nostalgic for the empire and believes that there may still be a shadow of its existance. I say Britain beware, the USA will love that because one day it will be easy to end up USA's colony.

    A team is only strong if it is united and Britain better pull up its socks and work with and in the team for its benefit and the rest of the members.

    By :
    Frank
    - Posted on :
    11/01/2013
  • Like Tony Blair before him, Cameron is trying to be Wall st's current Favourite poodle.

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    11/01/2013
  • Seems that there is a lot of anti British feelings so it would be better for us to leave, of course the utter junk that the eu, there is no such country, exports more to Norway and Switzerland is lacking in any truth whatsoever. The Irish would of course be far worse off without us in the eussr, because unlike them we are a net contributer, Germany the biggest contributer, and France equal second with us as a net contributer, but only since 2005, are unlikely to be able to make up the shortfall. And that is after the rebate that we are still the second highest net contributer. Of course if we leave we won't need the opt outs and rebates because we won't be held by the democratically deficient destructive legislation from Brussells and won't be paying in to it.

    I wonder if Ireland will be able to match the uk's military capability, as they seem to want to build it up.

    As for holding the presidency of all the eussr presidents it is the least influential, followed closely by rumpy and the president of the eussr parliament, the only one who has any power is the unelected political failure barosso.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    11/01/2013
  • Without in any way wishing to encourage an exit,surely the EU is and always has been an a la carte project? That is indeed one of its strengths. There has always been the possibility of opt out, used by many MSS (including Ireland) to get over awkward moments. There is the Treaty procedure for enhanced cooperation. There is Schengen. And the whole of the JHA is based on previous inter-governmental cooperation in the fields of asylum, border control, criminal procedure, etc.

    By :
    Carol Harlow
    - Posted on :
    11/01/2013
  • Carole Harlow No the eussr has never been an a la carte project, it is very hard to get opt outs they don't come automatically, and when the majority voting takes place those against any particular bad law will have no opt out available, they will be told to accept something they don't want. That is what the constitutionally rejected constitution which was forced on to us as the lisbon treaty achieved. We opted out of Schengen, and yet we are forced to allow all and sundry in from the eussr former nations, because some unelected foreigner insists that we do as ordered, not as we would wish. Your ideation of what this, the most corrupt and democratically deficient body in the world does and is is very wrong.

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    11/01/2013
  • Sounds to we Aussies, long-term members of the British Commonwealth of nations, that Britain should divorce itself from basket case Europe and re-focus on its familial relationship with us, and doing business with the countries in this prosperous region.

    Why the UK ever subjugated itself to Brussels is a mystery but it's not too late to reverse the damage.

    If that's what UK citizens want, UK politicians are obliged to reflect their wishes and retrieve your dignity, your culture, your social standards, your independence. Give them 10 years more of what we are seeing and Brussels dictators will have taken England by stealth.

    By :
    Sydney girl
    - Posted on :
    11/01/2013
  • People write about Britain's membership of the EU as if it was merely concerning governmental interests .
    In the quoted 40 years since Britain joined the EEC , the hearts of the British people have never been won over , despite a 1975 referendum vote to stay in the EEC .
    John Major was very unwise to have signed the Maastricht treaty against very strong parlarmentary opposition and huge public opposition . A referendum should have been held before signing Maastricht .
    Britain should never have joined the EU beyond the EEC!

    David Cameron is sitting on a tight-rope , with banking , financial services and some industries desparate for Britain to remain in the EU, not to rock the boat in difficult times . On the other side are the people of Britain a majority of whom want OUT of the EU altogether . If Cameron doesn't heed the peoples anti EU sentiment , the conservatives will be out at the next general election . There will be the prospect of a labour government , even at a pinch UKIP , or another coalition perhaps conservative/UKIP .

    I would advise Ireland to stay out of the argument!
    Britain and Ireland may be close neighbours , but there is really no love lost between the two . Ireland's meddling in British affairs could arouse hatred among British people . The conflict is not so much between the British Government and the EU Brussels , as between the British people and the EU .

    The original EU consisted of 6 European mainland countries , that had all been overun by Germany or defeated during WWII . It was never intended to grow into the unwealdy monster it is today . If 6 adjoining countries whose customs and cultures were not too disimilar , that might well have worked .
    The EU of today spreads over far too wide a range of cultures , customs and economies .
    Britain has tried her hardest to be at the centre of the EU ; but the EU is the baby of Germany and France . Britain has tried to make suggestions for the better working of the EU , but is ignored .

    If the Euro suvives , it will pull down the EU .
    Rompy Pumpy may be right that Britain renegociating laws and terms , may create a disintegration of the EU , but that is because the EU has little real cohesion anyway .

    Britain should leave the EU completely and have a simple agreement to continue trade as usual . EU countries would be the greater losers if trading was blocked or tariffs introduced , as the sell more to Britain than Britain within the EU .
    I can understand that for Britain to have free trading partners close at had across the English channel was tempting .
    Britain has always traded around the world ; British people see themselves as British , not European .
    Britain should have formed an alliance with English speaking people around the world , rather than in an European Tower of Babel .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    12/01/2013
  • Do Aussies really want to return to closer relations with POMs

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    12/01/2013
  • Return to weekly update , see right VIDEOS

    Listen to James K Galbraith on the crisis of inequality in Europe .

    Very interesting , and as near the truth as you are going to get .

    Britain is right to be seeking an exit to the EU , which is on a slippery slope toward collapse from which it is unlikely ever to recover .

    If the EU had competent leaders , who listened to sound advice , they could have taken drastic measures to halt the decline .
    EU leaders cannot "See the wood for the trees" or "Beyond the end of their nose", inflexibility and incompetence are causing the downfall of the EU .

    It would be better to Stop the EU now , break it apart and rethink it on different lines as a loosely knit commonwealth of nation states , fully in control of their national governments , economies , with their own separate currencies .

    Years ago my mother 5'2" lamented to our family groom that she hadn't long enough legs for riding.
    Our groom , a former jockey , replied ," Never mind Ma'm ,They put good scent in little bottles .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    12/01/2013
  • In the case of the UK here we are 40 years on in the EU in what could be best described as a 'bugger's muddle. Many have stated that national politicians have never engaged the population (UK) and in fact have lied about the whole project (McMillan, Heath, Wilson).
    It is the view of many that 60 years after the founding fathers came up with the idea and 40 years after the UK joined, we are skidding along the bottom. We were told that eventually things would evolve but with no real time scale, maybe 50 or 100 years.
    Twelve years ago an ill conceived currency union was formed. This and its subsequent meltdown has caused a huge panic which it seems can only be solved by Political, Banking and Financial Union. It seems that a US of E is to be inflicted upon us regardless.
    We read from journalists and others about the 'European Dream' and the United States of Europe. My question is where are the citizens of this artificial concept? Where is the glue that is needed to bind us together? Where are all these so called Europeans? Can anyone define what a European is, coming from so many disparate backgrounds and cultures with many different languages. And what is it that will hold them together? In my view it is a basic tenant of citizenship that we are able to communicate with each other and put our point of view on this and that. This blog is proof, if proof were needed, that we are unable to communicate outside our state boundaries (apologies to one or two notable exceptions).
    We have a very expensive Capital city, Parliament and a Civil Service/Commission which has given us thousands upon thousands of pages of laws, rules and regulations. Yet no one seems to understand or value it/them.
    Many bloggers compare the EU to the USA but the Americans have their values clearly defined in a Bill of Rights and US Constitution. The EU does not have anything similar that any citizen could pick up and read without employing an army of lawyers for interpretation. I have tried to read the 'Lisbon Treaty' but had to give up in favour of the 'will to live'. The Americans started from fresh and it has taken them 225 years to get where they are today. They at least could communicate with each other having a common language. What is it Brussels has done to the English language which makes it so hard for UK citizens to understand their own language. Perhaps we could export the 'Plain English Society' to Brussels to help them out.

    So the question must be how will the EU stitch together the patchwork quilt that is the current EU and give its citizens the 'will to survive and succeed'?
    Where is the glue that will hold us together (USSR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia anyone)? Where is the route map and time-scale? Where is our democracy coming from?
    EC Commissioner Barnier has recently had the honesty to write and suggest that it is time for the French to have a national conversation about the EU and where they may want to see it go. Remember that in 2005 it was the French and Dutch referendum that scuppered the EU constitution, which later was given new life as the Lisbon Treaty.
    Let me ask the question again that my old friend, Don Latuske, asks and fails to get any response:
    1) Do you think that a majority of the 500 million people in Europe would vote for a US of E if they were given a referendum?
    2) Do you think that, as further integration emerges, the 27 countries will give their electorates referenda?

    Recently, led by the Americans, we have had much hot air about the wows that would befall the UK if we left the EU. I would suggest to all out there that the amount of pressure coming from all parts of the compass only goes to prove how important the UK is and that it is in the interests of all concerned to anchor us inside the EU. Please remember that although I trust them more than Europeans our good American friends have arrogant form in this area. Both George W Bush and Barack Obama's government have tried to interfere in EU affairs (they are not a member) by suggesting that it would be remiss of the EU not to admit Turkey as a member as soon as possible.
    All answers please on a postcard addressed to the EU Council of Ministers, Dublin.

    George Mc

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    17/01/2013
  • George Mc

    An excellent post !!! Much food for thought .

    By :
    David Barneby
    - Posted on :
    17/01/2013
Eamon Gilmore, Irish Deputy Prime Minister
Background: 

Ireland’s is the first of a ‘Trio’ of EU Council presidencies, with Lithuania and Greece to follow.

In a 1973 referendum on its accession, 83% of Irish citizens voted in favour of joining the European Union. “The Irish people have generally shown commitment to the EU when the case is made to them properly”, Irish ambassador Rory Montgomery has said.

Meanwhile in the UK, which has also joined the EU in 1973,  Prime Minister David Cameron is grappling with a rising anti-EU mood at home that could threaten his chances of re-election. Speaking at the end of the December summit that secured the first part of a banking union, Cameron played down fears Britain's future lies on the margins of a two-tier Europe, while eurozone members build an ever-stronger core.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 4

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising