EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

MPs urge Cameron to ditch EU status quo

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 16 January 2013, updated 25 January 2013

A caucus of eurosceptic Conservative MPs has issued a manifesto today (16 January), two days before Prime Minister David Cameron is set to make a landmark speech on Europe, stating that “the status quo is no longer an option” and demanding “a new and different relationship” with the European Union.

The Fresh Start group of Conservative backbenchers – numbering nearly 100 of the party’s 304 deputies – sets out proposals to repatriate legislative powers to the UK and cut Britain’s bill for EU membership by billions of pounds a year.

 

Cameron will outline his vision for Britain’s future in the EU in his long-awaited speech in Amsterdam on Friday (18 January). He is expected to set out plans to renegotiate the country’s relationship with Europe which will then be the subject of a referendum, probably in 2018.

The Fresh Start manifesto recommends four significant revisions to the EU treaties including the repatriation of all social and employment laws, such as the Working Time Directive; an opt-out from all existing policing and criminal justice measures; an “emergency brake” on any new legislation that affects financial services; and an end to the European Parliament’s monthly move from Brussels to Strasbourg.

Threat to withhold funding

The MPs also raised the possibility of the UK withholding funds for EU development schemes if these were not reformed, to force a "meaningful negotiation" on budgetary priorities.

"Events in Europe mean that the way the EU operates is bound to change significantly," they said.

"Over the coming years, there will be a series of opportunities for the UK to take back power from Brussels. This is the perfect chance for us to negotiate a radically different relationship with the EU, one which properly serves Britain's interests.

In an interview with EurActiv, Dominic Raab, a leading member of the Fresh Start Group – and author of the manifesto’s chapter on justice and home affairs – said: “We would like to be good, strong operational partners in Europe but that shouldn’t mean… to cede democratic control.”

US input dismissed

Raab said that he favoured a “referendum sandwich” for the UK, meaning that there should be two referendums: one to validate the bargaining position of the UK in Europe and a second to validate the negotiation.

He resisted criticism of the UK eurosceptics from US quarters, claiming that the US will become increasingly disinterested in Europe as it pushes for a more Asia Pacific focus.

“I think the europhiles and eurosceptics would both agree that the US does not really understand what exactly is happening in the EU. The more federalist and centralised the EU becomes the more the UK’s role will be eroded,” Raab said.

The Fresh Start manifesto is likely to put pressure on Cameron but also increase tension within the Conservative Party, where moderates still favour heavier engagement with the EU.

Positions: 

„The European Union shouldn't cave into Great Britain's blackmailing", said Jo Leinen from the Socialists & Democrats group, in the run-up to Prime Minister David Cameron's speech about the UK's future relationship to the EU.

"We can't allow cherry-picking by one member state at the expense of the others. The United Kingdom must decide if it wants to stay a full member of the EU or prefers a privileged partnership outside the Union."

Next steps: 

18 Jan.: British Prime Minister David Cameron to deliver landmark speech on EU-UK relations

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • If the UK government introduces any form of restrictions for free movement of bulgarians I will personally petition the new bulgarian government to be elected in 2013 to introduce similiar restrictions for brits living and working here, having in mind that they mostly come here on sex and alchoholic tourism and my fellow countrymen usually who go to UK usually go there to spend money, work and pay taxes that go into the british budget.

    By :
    Alexander
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • If Cameron succeeds to reform the EU with its 450 subsidizing funds, much is gained. Does anyone knows how much out of these funds is spent for non-producing conferences anfd theoritical research? Billions and billions.

    By :
    Willem, a Dutchman
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • Well, as European I think this is gone far enough!... it's time for Britain to take a final decision, either you're in or you're not.
    If you're in, you're for what the EU stands: integration. So stop complaining at every corner and help to toil and moil.
    And if you're out, then don't expect to be consulted anymore on internal EU issues and be prepared to negotiate as any other non-EU country would.
    I'm a little fed up with this nonsense from British MPs!

    By :
    Enric
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • “"the status quo is no longer an option” and demanding “a new and different relationship” with the European Union."

    YES!! New Relationship!! OUT!! Brits are Wall st podle and as such the EU does not need their constant chaos which is intentional to weaken Europe so it is easier for USA to dominate.

    Then the EU can get down to progressing to becoming a Confederation of European states with a Centrale with its OWN DEFINED powers derived from the citizens of EU.

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • The reality is that most of the MPs in the British Parliament are in favour of maintaining the UK's membership of the EU, and this will most likely still be the case after the next UK election in 2015.
    David Cameron can talk about having a referendum, if he thinks it will help him to manage his party and minimize the threat presented by UKIP. But he will not have to actually hold a referendum unless and until the Conservatives win a majority of seats in the House of Commons (which currently looks unlikely).

    By :
    Ben
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • Please calm down Mr. Tarbuck and do not put a cart before a horse. Before progressing to a confederation one should be clear in what would be the purpose of having it in the first place - how far do the European citizens want the integration to go and most importantly, what do they themselves expect to gain from it? They themselves, I stress.
    As for the UK, should it really eventually and improbably leave the EU as it is now, one viable option would be for the UK to became a memeber of the EEA (European Economic Area) like Norway or Switzerland. Thus preserving for both sides the achievements of the "four freedoms" which are the cornerstone of the EU and the most tangible benefits for Europeans to see and to enjoy.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • Alexander, I had no idea that Bulgaria was a destination for sex and alcoholic tourism. I can only imagine that your countrymen are spending their money derived from these activities!! Looking at what happens in many English cities and towns on Friday and Saturday night, I can only imagine that these same Bulgars are becoming immensely rich and if so, good luck to them!!Anonymous is right about what other europeans want. I have asked in other postings 2 questions to which I have had very few responses. 1)Do you think that a majority of the 500million or so euroipeans would vote for further integration (if it were spelled out openly and honestly what its impact would be) and 2)Do you think the 26 nations involved would hold referenda for their citizens to vote for deeper economic and political integration i.e.ceding all national power to an entity yet to be described?

    By :
    Don Latuske
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • @Enric- Posted on : 16/01/2013

    I agree completely with you!!
    GB has gone to far ! They should take an decision now and NOT waiting until 2018 in Referendum!

    Americans and europeans have learned to live together despite racial problems but Britain with it's special needs want rather be isolated !
    In reality they even don'tk now what they want!
    The only they are is the Ukip listener the bad way one ...
    They aren't ! never were and don't want to be Europeans ! They are Britts!
    Ok Let's them go without handbraking them :-)

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    16/01/2013
  • @Don Latuske- Posted on : 16/01/2013reply

    Yes !
    Europe has to and it will be economically and politically seen the need to preserve the symbol of the Euro which is freedom which never has to be forget since the WW2!
    We europeans :Childrens, women and mens are all equal or at lest it should be in all 27 States or in the whole european continent !!
    It has to be done long ago as Americans did in a Convention of Philadelphia directly ! But better later than never!
    Such a political decision is too important to hold a referendum because we know that everybody wants power and often misuse it!
    We don't want again to involve to "Nationalism" conflicts again as it was 70 years ago!

    This is the reality!!!

    And in the end The reunification in memory of these old good words from Winston Churchill will be realized !

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    17/01/2013
  • Hopefully the squishy Cameron wqill do the right thing and England will manage to seperate from the EUSSR! Let the commies have France.

    By :
    Westie
    - Posted on :
    17/01/2013
  • This is ridiculous. By 2018 the UK will already be clearly outside the political process of the EU, that will forcibly become intertwined with the governance of the €uro. These are smoke and mirrors to make the British folk believe they had some say on the matter.

    By :
    Luís
    - Posted on :
    18/01/2013

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 2

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising