EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Cameron under pressure over new EU ambassador

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 19 August 2013, updated 22 August 2013

An influential committee in the British Parliament has requested permission to ‘vet’ the candidate set to replace Britain's permanent representative to the European Union in Brussels.

Sir Jon Cunliffe, the UK’s permanent representative to the EU, is leaving Brussels to join the Bank of England as deputy governor. Ivan Rogers, who is currently working as Prime Minister David Cameron’s adviser on Europe and global issues, is expected to be named in the coming weeks as Cunliffe’s replacement.

Rogers will be taking over at a delicate time in the UK's relations with the EU, with Cameron seeking to repatriate powers from Brussels to London, and his party pledging an in/out referendum on EU membership in 2017.

MP Bill Cash, the chairman of the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee, has written to Cameron requesting that his committee question Rogers in advance of his appointment.

Although pre-appointment hearings are a familiar feature of the American political system, they are only beginning to gain ground in the UK.

Committee can summon witnesses if necessary

Bill Cash told EurActiv that the UK parliament’s liaison committee – another influential body which consists of the chairmen of all the other committees – has also made a strong case for the pre-appointment hearing.

Cash said that since the post of permanent representative involves legislative decision-making that comes under the remit of his committee, “it is an issue of accountability to Parliament”.

The committee has suggested that the hearing could take place in early September, Cash said, adding that he had asked Cameron to explain his reasoning if he refused the request.

Cash – a leading conservative eurosceptic – refused to be drawn on what actions the committee may take if its request is turned down, but his committee has the right to summon witnesses to appear before it if necessary.

Any questioning of Rogers is likely to focus on his policy background. He is credited with strengthening the UK’s relations with Germany in recent months, a relationship critical if Cameron is to succeed in his aim of repatriating significant powers from Brussels.

His political background may cause some concern to the Conservative party’s eurosceptic wing. In the 1990s he worked as chief of staff to the vice-president of the European Commission, Lord Leon Brittan, and he previously worked as a political private secretary to Kenneth Clarke, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Both Brittan and Clarke are seen as figurehead pro-Europeans within the Conservative party.

Next steps: 
  • 2 Sept: UK Parliament resumes work
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Just what we need another pro eussr diplomat being sent to give away more power to the unelected commissars. Why do we need an ambassadorial position at the eussr anyway, another overpaid job for the boys perhaps?

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    20/08/2013
  • Correct Barry, anyone who has been associated with rampant Euro Philes like Leon Brittan and Kenneth Clarke needs to be treated with the utmost suspicion. I am sure it will not take him long to get the hang of the fine wine and food and go native.

    I have a lot of time for Bill Cash who has been consistent in his politics even in the darkest times. However I have the deepest mistrust of David Cameron who does not have the political balls to come right out and say I am a supporter of the EU come what may. If he believed what he say we would be having a referendum before the next election.
    He is however trying to hold back the tide until after the next election when he may not be PM and therefore all bets (and promises) are off.

    Clegg and Miliband are from the same stable so we are left with no other option other than to vote for UKIP.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    20/08/2013
  • correction to above
    If he believed what he said we would be having a referendum before the next election.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    20/08/2013
  • I believe Bill Cash is the right candidate for replacing Sir John Cunliffe. In such a position he might learn a great deal more on the subject abd on his return he might, whilst still chosing to be hostile to the UE as a concept, he may get a new lese of life through his experience - with a great deal more respect for the work carried out in Brussels by the British Government's permanent civil service representation. On the other hand he is an elected member of Parliament and not a civil servant.

    By :
    Roberto
    - Posted on :
    20/08/2013
  • Some people are for the EU some are not! This is not a trick question and there is no correct answer! Bill Cash is probably a lot better informed than the posters on here and is indeed elected which trumps a career Civil Servant any day. The people of the UK (only) have to make their mind up on this, that's sovereignty and democracy. Quite a difficult concept for some especially as their preferred option does not appear to be supported by the electorate

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    20/08/2013
  • National "Permanent Representatives" are in charge of the political secretariate of the Council. The Council is an Institution where most decisions are taken by majority voting. Most of these decisions are taken on the basis of proposals from the Commission and subject to the agreement of the European Parliament. Members of the EP are directly elected by european citizens in each of the member states. This being said, nothing prevents national parliaments to have a say in the nomination of PR's as they would on any other ambassadors - in the UN by example. It remains that, in their daily business, PR's receive their orders from national governments and not from parliaments. The reverse would be a recipee for total cahos. JGG

    By :
    Jean-Guy Giraud
    - Posted on :
    21/08/2013
  • JGG
    It was my understanding that National Permanent Representatives are indeed Ambassadors who have a team to help their countries negotiate with Brussels and inform the EU about the laws and views of their country.
    It is my belief that they have nothing to do with the Council.

    Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    21/08/2013
  • GMc You may want to look under COREPER to find the nature/functions of PR

    By :
    Jean-Guy Giraud
    - Posted on :
    21/08/2013
  • JGG
    Many thanks for that, most informative.

    You can however see why people who delve into the machinations of the EU come to the conclusion that the EU would give Bureaucracy a good name.

    Regards

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    21/08/2013
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Westminster: Request for oversight
Background: 

A potential British exit from the European Union came to the top of the political agenda after Prime Minister David Cameron said that Britain must use the upheaval created by the eurozone crisis to forge a new relationship with the European Union.

In January, Cameron promised to offer Britons a simple ‘in/out’ referendum choice on whether to stay in the European Union if he wins the next election, scheduled for 2015.

Britain has negotiated a number of opt-outs from key EU policy areas since its accession in 1973. The country is not part of the eurozone and has not signed the free-border Schengen Treaty and does not want to abide by a number of EU police and judicial cooperation rules.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 4

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising