EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Van Rompuy to Cameron: 'We have an exit clause'

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 01 March 2013

Herman Van Rompuy, European Council President, issued his strongest warning yet to Britain, saying in a speech in London yesterday (28 February) that the EU's door was open to those in the club who want to leave.

Van Rompuy, who chairs the regular meeting of EU national leaders, said Britain had a chance to play a leading role in building the European economy now the euro zone had the "artillery" of economic tools to get itself out of the worst crisis in its history.

But Van Rompuy laced his speech in London's financial district with a clear warning to Cameron: Europe will not countenance any attempt by Britain to win an 'a-la-carte' membership, picking and choosing which of the European Union's rules it will follow and which to reject.

He cautioned Prime Minister David Cameron that the bloc's other leaders do not want to renegotiate Europe's founding treaties and that simpler means were available for Britain to redefine its relationship to Europe.

"Leaving the club altogether, as a few advocate, is legally possible," Van Rompuy said. "We have an 'exit clause'.

"But it's not a matter of just walking out. It would be legally and politically a most complicated and unpractical affair. Just think of a divorce after 40 years of marriage."

"Leaving is an act of free will and perfectly legitimate but it doesn't come for free," he said in a speech to bankers and politicians at the Guildhall, an 800-year-old institution that is a symbol of British merchant power in the City of London.

Cameron has promised to try to claw back powers from the EU and put any new settlement to voters in an in-out referendum by the end of 2017, heightening fears that Britain could leave the club it joined 40 years ago, in 1973.

"The wish to redefine your country's relationship with the Union has not gone unnoticed," said Van Rompuy, a former premier of EU founding member Belgium. "I cannot speak on behalf of the other presidents and prime ministers, but I presume they neither particularly like it, nor particularly fear it."

Treaty changes?

Cameron, a Conservative who says he wants Britain to stay inside the world's biggest economic bloc, warned in a speech on Jan. 23 that the European public was disillusioned with the EU and that Britain needed a new settlement.

British opponents of the European Union say it is a doomed project which has been imposed on European populations by an arrogant elite and that Britain should seek to go it alone.

Van Rompuy said Europe's leaders could not afford complacency and that bold reforms were needed to strengthen the euro zone, but that the integration ahead did not require further treaty changes.

"I see no impending need to open the EU treaties," he said, adding that Britain's ambivalent relations with Europe were undermining its negotiating position.

"How do you convince a room full of people when you keep your hand on the door handle?"

Van Rompuy's insistence on no treaty change undermined Cameron's strategy for getting Britain a new type of EU membership, said former EU Commissioner Peter Mandelson.

"The prime minister has made great play of radical treaty change - which he believes is necessary, which will provide the vehicle for the repatriation of powers that he wants. President Van Rompuy seemed to shoot that fox," Mandelson told Reuters.

"If there is not going to be such a new treaty, I don't know what the alternative vehicle will be for what the prime minister wants: you cannot have a unilateral negotiation."

Van Rompuy said a club producing one fifth of global gross domestic product gave its members a clout they would not have alone. But he dodged a direct question on whether a provisional EU deal to cap pay bonuses would damage the City of London, a major contributor to Britain's economy.

He said the 2008 global financial crisis had exposed the weakness of the European common currency project and kept open the chance of further "aftershocks".

"Talk of imminent break-up has vanished. It is finally sinking in that the euro is here to stay, and that this is due to deep political determination," he said. "Even if there may be turbulence ahead, we have the artillery we need."

Positions: 

Under pressure from Eurosceptic politicians, the UK Government launched a "Balance of Competences Review" last summer to provide the British public with an "objective analysis of Britain’s relationship with the EU."

In a commentary published on EurActiv, Britain's Europe Minister David Lidington wrote that the review "will produce 32 reports over the next two years, looking at everything the EU does and how it affects the UK, from the environment to education to EU enlargement".

Lidington stressed that the review will not make specific recommendations and "is not designed as a prelude to cherry-picking the Treaties, or to British exit from the EU". Rather, it will provide evidence for an informed and "serious debate in the UK," he wrote.

>> Read Lidington's commentary: What does EU membership mean for the UK?

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • No word from Van Rompuy about restructuring the EU, as if the EU is the perfect body for guiding Europe into a highly uncertain future, thanks, a.o., to the euro.
    As long as France remains as stubbon, as she always was to protect own interests, Cameron has all the rights to protect England from the unnecessary costs and inefficieny France inflicts on Europe.

    By :
    Willem, a Dutchman
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • President Van Rompuy acclaimed that there is an exit clause...Exit clause it is (Article 50) but not an Expelling clause. Now this remains a thing to be introduced by another treaty perhaps, amending Lisbon Treaty. Having the right to withdraw, doesn't imply the right of expelling a MS from the EU.
    He makes mention of a divorce after 40 years which looks impractical and inconvenient. Well a divorce is due to an impractical convivence between consorts and therefore it is better to split rather than destroy whatever has been built.
    Nevertheless, I am glad that finally one EU leader managed to raise his voice and put forth a strong stand!!!

    By :
    Alketa Sala
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • Von Rompuy's comments and challenges to Cameron's promise of a 2017 referendum exposes it for what it is: nothing more than a political bluff and transparent cherry picking. In terms of the European project, not now or in the future, is the UK going to wander off into some kind of heroic pursuit of nationalist glory.

    By :
    Earl Bell
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • AMEN!! GOOD BYE BRITAIN!!

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • If i were cameron , id get out asap. Club euroextremist is a sinking ship. People are waking up and finding out what the eurofile agenda is. Its not the euro and its not the eu, its power and the more the better. The people running the show in brussels will stop at nothing to accomplish their goal.
    Cameron isnt cherry picking , hes letting brussels know that the british cant be used as a doormat.
    Election bluff or not ,hes got the guts to stand up to brussels , the rest are spineless gutless followers that are there for thier own interests.
    We in the netherlands are also being dismantled financially by SamsonRutte, they have an agenda, samson would sell the netherlands today if the price was right. If he hasnt already with Dijselbloom.
    I commend Cameron for his stand, and i wish there were more like him.

    By :
    klassen
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • So membership of the great EU project is only to be granted to those who toe the line, is that a fair appraisal? National sovereignty is apparently a misguided concept.

    By :
    Tony Ball
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • Calling for a referendum in 2017 hardly qualifies as taking a tough position. It is more in the category of not taking a position. The exist clause is available, why didn't Cameron call for an immediate use of it, especially if British national honor and sovereignty is in some condition of disrepair due to the compulsory, counterproductive policies of the EU?

    By :
    Earl Bell
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • By : Alketa Sala - Posted on : 01/03/2013

    Indeed i'am a bit confused but agree with you that finally raised the words to Mr Cameron !
    Finally i will see an handbrake release for the European Integration & Solidarity !

    By :
    United Alliance
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • By : Alketa Sala - Posted on : 01/03/2013

    Indeed i'am a bit confused but agree with you that finally raised the words to Mr Cameron !
    Finally i will see an handbrake release for the European Integration & Solidarity !

    By :
    United Alliance
    - Posted on :
    01/03/2013
  • This is unbelievable !

    Romp says: "We are not witnessing the birth pangs of a federal ‘Euro-land’"

    But the economy and jobless issues needs unlikely he said , still federal policies and structures to reinforce these weak issues !

    So Barbarossa called for a federation of nation state !?

    What now Mr van Romp ?! Are You in favor to Cameron ?
    Is it your interest ?
    Or is the economy & jobs less important?

    Finally what does the Euro help us if we still are
    grappling the still rising jobless & worsens economy?
    Nor Europe and UK can't still stay at this Situation!

    You should be RETIRED if this is European Idea !

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    02/03/2013
  • GOOD BYE BRITAIN! GOOD BYE CAMERON! GOOD BYE BLAIR!

    Cameron, take your "Financial Services' with you! They are just toadies of Wall st and 'The Fed'; Europe is better off without them and you.

    Blair, take your ideas for militarism and the resulting war crimes with you.

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    02/03/2013
  • @david tarbuck- Posted on : 02/03/2013reply

    " I HOPE IT "

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    02/03/2013
  • Should Mr. Rompuy keep defected Treaty? Annex I to the Treaty based on non existing Brussels nomenclature, Article 175 and 178 refer to non existing any more EAGGF fund. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY THAN TO CHANGE AT LEAST THESE ISSUES OF THE TREATIES. But why Rompuy does not want to talk about other very important part of Mr. Cameron's speach -- EU BUREAUCRACY AND ITS SCLEROTIC DECISIONS???

    By :
    Defected Treaty
    - Posted on :
    03/03/2013
  • Well it is clear , countries who want to be or stay in the EU will have to toe the line , this is then far from being a democracy , and as people have said , EU politicians trying to get more and more power .
    Nomatter what the EU says , citizens will one day force the politicians into renegociating the treaties , the whole thing has been badly done , and politicians who agreed to all this are often no longer there . There has to be accountability outside elections for EU parliamentarians , the commission snd civil servants.
    After all when the politicians make big mistakes , wht have they to lose , just the next election , that is not good enough , there has to be legal accountability.

    By :
    Paul Rice
    - Posted on :
    03/03/2013
  • I agree with Willem,Tony Ball, Defected Treaty and Paul Rice - well said, but the unelected officials in Brussels love the status quo and will ignore all comments, even if from one of the EU's elected national leaders. Early decisions by the 6 were in their interests, and become part of the unchangeable 'acquis communitaire' - such as the EP being required to have 3 seats (nice at the time, but very inefficient and ruinously expensive now). The same with the original design of the Euro - but Von Rompuy and others avoid any discussion of these and similar issues, merely attacking those who step out of line, such as David Cameron. Democracy!! The Brussels set-up is an oligarchy! - but they will be OK as long as we allow the disastrous collapse to happen after their watch is over.

    By :
    Robert Skailes
    - Posted on :
    04/03/2013
  • Who actually cares what von rumpy has to say he is an unelected political failure with no mandate to do anything. He is just one of the presidents of the eussr, barrosso seems to be the on;y one with any clout and he too is unelected, democratic government anyone ??

    By :
    Barry Davies
    - Posted on :
    26/03/2013
  • Von Rumpy was making a simply argument, there is an exit clause; if the Cameron administration's concern about UK participation in the EU is substantial, then he can attempt to convince Parliament to support withdrawal and instead of offering to support some distance referendum that seems like a political ploy. Where are the great democrats in the governance of the UK or the EU?

    By :
    Earl Bell
    - Posted on :
    26/03/2013
  • I've just seen a documentary on the lobbies operating in Brussels (The Brussels Business) and it was quite revolting stuff. Even in the US disclosure isn't voluntary for lobbyists (as it obviously makes the measure pointless)!
    I couldn't help but think what Germany has done over the years to the EU CO2 laws for cars and what impact this has on our health, on the EU legal CO2 obligations, etc. The EU legislation on GMOs and shale gas (Germany as well) also show that EU legislation is decided by who pays the most for lobbying to get their way.

    The UK would do very, very well to get out of the EU as soon as possible.

    By :
    Rob Crabbe
    - Posted on :
    30/03/2013
  • I've just seen a documentary on the lobbies operating in Brussels (The Brussels Business) and it was quite revolting stuff. Even in the US disclosure isn't voluntary for lobbyists (as it obviously makes the measure pointless)!

    I couldn't help but think what Germany has done over the years to the EU CO2 laws for cars and what impact this has on our health, on the EU legal CO2 obligations, etc. The EU legislation on GMOs and shale gas (Germany as well) also show that EU legislation is decided by who pays the most for lobbying to get their way. The interests of citizens are toally irrelevant.

    The UK would do very, very well to get out of the EU as soon as possible.

    By :
    Rob Crabbe
    - Posted on :
    30/03/2013
  • I've just seen a documentary on the lobbies operating in Brussels (The Brussels Business) and it was quite revolting stuff. Even in the US disclosure isn't voluntary for lobbyists (as it obviously makes the measure pointless)!

    I couldn't help but think what Germany has done over the years to the EU CO2 laws for cars and what impact this has on our health, on the EU legal CO2 obligations, etc. The EU legislation on GMOs and shale gas (Germany as well) also show that EU legislation is decided by who pays the most for lobbying to get their way.

    The interests of citizens are totally irrelevant. Legislation in Brussels is auctioned off to lobbyists at the highest price. The UK would do very, very well to get out of the EU as soon as possible.

    By :
    Rob Crabbe
    - Posted on :
    30/03/2013
Background: 

UK Prime Minister David Cameron promised in January to offer Britons a simple ‘in-out’ referendum choice on whether to stay in the European Union if he wins the next election, scheduled for 2015.

>> Read: Cameron takes gamble with in/out EU referendum pledge

Cameron's referendum pledge seems to resonate with public opinion.

Given an in-out referendum on EU membership tomorrow, 50% would vote “out” against 33% “in” and 17% who would not vote either way, according to a Harris Interactive poll published in February.

>> Read: Poll shows half of Brits would vote to leave the EU

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising