EU farmers: Prevention is better than cure for sustainable livestock

MEP Carthy: “There is a cost to society if we lose access to drugs that protect our health. And I think farmers recognise that." [Shutterstock]

This article is part of our special report The role of innovation in Europe’s animal health.

Prevention is far better than cure when it comes to animal diseases and creation of sustainable livestock. Vaccination may play a role in reducing the need for antibiotics, but it needs to be accompanied by other “tools”, such as education and training, farmer representatives and EU politicians have told EURACTIV.

Pekka Pesonen, secretary-general of EU farmers association, said that proper tools in terms of housing, biosecurity measures, feed, have to be in place. In this respect, CAP’s Rural Development and other types of intervention from the EU and member states to support farmers to do these investments must also be ensured.

“Vaccination may play a role in order to avoid the need for antimicrobials but there are certain conditions that have to be met such as consumer acceptance, the cost-effectiveness of the vaccine, availability. In any case, this may make part of a good prevention plan,” the EU farmers chief explained.

The EU has in recent years established a number of tools ranging from close monitoring systems to specific holistic long-term strategies to control animal diseases, especially the ones that have a direct impact on human public health.

The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) estimates that 20% of global food production is lost due to diseases in farmed animals.

The EU executive has also adopted the “One Health” principle to combat another crucial issue when it comes to human and animal health: antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

The One Health approach recognises that human and animal health is interconnected, that diseases are transmitted from humans to animals and vice versa and must, therefore, be tackled in both. In addition, it also refers to the environment, another potential source of new resistant microorganisms.

Expert: Animal health innovations will benefit both farming and society

An innovation-driven approach – ranging from vaccination to other health management solutions and appropriate biosecurity measures – will ensure more sustainable future livestock farming and protection of public health, as animal diseases do not recognise borders, Roxane Feller told

Antimicrobial resistance

According to the European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC), livestock consumption of antimicrobials in the EU is has declined over the past years and European farmers expect this trend to continue in the future.

However, Pesonen pointed out that antimicrobials also play a crucial role when it comes to treating animals in order to avoid unnecessary pain from diseases and to ensure good animal welfare.

“In order to use antimicrobials properly, farmers rely on veterinarians to prescribe them. Increasing awareness of antimicrobials consumption and how to reduce it is a good tool, provided that it also promotes among consumers the high EU production standards and the good results achieved so far,” he emphasised.

Karin Kadenbach, an Austrian member of the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) in the European Parliament, is currently drafting a report on a European One Health Action Plan on AMR due to be voted in the ENVI committee on 20 or 21 June. The plenary vote is foreseen for September.

“The One Health principle is a collaborative global approach to ensure coherence and coordination between human health, animal health and our ecosystem. There are many different options for achieving this goal and in the end, it will be important to combine as many of them as possible,” she told EURACTIV.

In her report, Kadenbach calls for certain antimicrobials to be limited to use in humans only, as many antimicrobials are currently used in both humans and animals.

“Some of those antimicrobials are critical for preventing or treating life-threatening infections in humans and their use on animals should be prohibited. In order to preserve the efficacy of these antimicrobials in the treatment of infections in humans for as long as possible, it is necessary to reserve those antimicrobials for humans only,” she said.

This is now being discussed in the ongoing trilogue negotiations on the veterinary medicinal products regulation, she added.

“I completely support the direction the negotiations are going in, including the measures to strengthen alternative therapies such as homoeopathy.”

The Austrian politician also pointed out that in animal health it is important not to apply antimicrobial medicinal products routinely or use them to compensate for poor hygiene and farm management, inadequate animal husbandry or lack of care.

As for the role of the EU institutions, she said they should back the best practice examples and offer information and help its member states.

“It starts with raising awareness amongst farmers and consumers and offering educational and training programmes to the public and healthcare professionals. The future CAP will also be an important tool to give incentives to farmers who produce in an ecological, sustainable, environmental and animal-friendly way.”

Innovation in animal health: Sifting the tangible actions from the political ideas

Over the past fifty years, the EU has done a stellar job in moving from a very fragmented national approach to animal disease control to a progressively more harmonised system of animal health measures, disease surveillance, diagnosis and control, writes Roxane Feller.


She explained that the executive should introduce a fast-track procedure where antimicrobials approved for industrial or agricultural purposes suspected of having a severe negative impact on antimicrobial resistance can be temporarily banned from usage until further studies on their impact have been carried out.

“In a current compromise (which is still under negotiation) we urge the Commission and the member states to restrict the sale of antibiotics by those human and animal health professionals who also prescribe them; and to remove any incentives – financial or otherwise – for the prescription of antibiotics.”

Kadenbach also noted that although the current legislation prohibits the use of antimicrobials as growth/performance enhancers in animals, there is still evidence of prophylactic use.

“This is why I call on the European Commission to ban the use of antibiotics and medicated feed for prevention purposes, except in clearly justified cases prescribed and controlled by a veterinarian. Additionally, I call for the phasing out of the routine metaphylactic use of antimicrobials in groups of farm animals.”

A ‘pragmatic approach’

Matt Carthy, an Irish member of the Confederal Group of the European United Left – Nordic Green Left (GUE-NGL), said the AGRI committee took a “pragmatic” stance on the issue.

“There is a cost to society if we lose access to drugs that protect our health. And I think farmers recognise that,” he told EURACTIV.

“From an animal welfare perspective, if an animal gets sick, farmers must be able to administer medicine in order to cure the animal. However, we also need to look into ways that cut down on the instances that farmers have to resort to antibiotics and prevent diseases in the first place.”

He explained that antibiotics were used to varying degrees in agriculture. Ireland, he said, has one of the lowest usages in Europe mainly due to the grass-based milk, beef and sheep production systems. But, where animals are kept in more confined housing or farmed on a more industrial scale, antibiotic usage is much higher.

“However, as much as doctors rely on the use of antibiotics for the treatment of infections and disease in human health, the advancement of new surgeries and many other practices of modern medicine, farmers rely on antimicrobial drugs for animal health in the farming and companion animal sectors. Their availability and use in farm livestock is of vital importance to the protection of animal welfare and the treatment of disease in animals.”

But for the leftist politician, it’s crucial to increase funding for on-farm investments in areas such as housing, ventilation, cleaning, disinfection, vaccination and biosecurity .

“I have also called for research into more alternatives to antibiotics as well as ways to strengthen natural defences from an early stage and at critical farming phases. €1.3bn has already been invested in AMR by the European Commission, and it is widely known that the sector is sitting on information in this regard. This is why tackling the business culture of pharmaceuticals and sales and prescription and overall overuse of antibiotics needs to form part of this debate.”

He added that EU farmers are already aware of the part they have to play in conserving antibiotics and called for a reduced rate of VAT for vaccines.

The AGRI committee also pushes for a proper implementation of the EU-wide 2006 ban on the use of antibiotics as growth promoters applied to all food imports from third countries.

“Antibiotic use in Brazil is expected to double from 2010 to 2030, yet the Commission is preparing to give them a tariff-rate quota of 99,000 tonnes for their beef imports. It just doesn’t add up.”

Carthy noted that the inclusion of an obligation for farmers to draw up an Animal Health Plan in the Knowledge Transfer Scheme is “definitely a step in the right direction” in terms of targeting knowledge and the engagements with both veterinary professionals and other farmers on these issues.

However, he said, the scheme is still in its infancy and there have been multiple problems in the implementation and rollout in some member states, including Ireland.

“The overall participation rate has been somewhat lower than anticipated due to the excessive costs borne by farmers who had wanted to take part. This is an issue I have engaged with Commissioner Hogan over in the past and hope that in the upcoming reforms these shortcomings can be addressed.”

Subscribe to our newsletters