The EU legislation provides that principles of Replacement, Reduction and Refinement (3Rs) should be “considered systematically” when animals are used for scientific purposes in the EU
These alternatives are basically scientific guiding principles for the more ethical use of animals in testing, avoiding or replacing the use of animals.
According to the European Commission, these alternatives aim to:
- obtain the required information without the use of live animals;
- reduce the numbers of animals whilst obtaining the same level of information;
- refine the use of live animals so as to cause less pain, distress or suffering, or improve the welfare of the animals.
But these alternatives, according to the EU executive, should also have as the objective to develop “better and more predictive scientific tools” to protect human and animal health.
This event report looks into what is needed to build further confidence in these alternatives.
-
Green MEP calls for EU action plan on alternatives to animal testing
All initiatives to promote alternatives to animal testing are welcome, but lawmakers should be bolder and impose some mandatory measures as well, Luxembourgish MEP Tilly Metz has said.
-
Expert: EU citizens and industry expect ‘big reduction’ in mandatory animal testing
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and the Joint Research Centre scientists have a key role to play in meeting the demand of EU citizens and industry, who want to see a big reduction in mandatory animal testing via new methodologies, Dr Julia Fentem told EURACTIV in an interview.
-
It is time to think differently on animal alternative approaches
The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) is a unique partnership between industry and European Commission in the EU with an overall goal to increase confidence in the use of the so-called 3Rs …
