Est. 6min 27-05-2010 (updated: 05-11-2012 ) optical_research.jpg Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Hungary's expenditure on investing in research and development (R&D) barely amounts to 1% of GDP today. While Brussels sees boosting research and innovation as a way out of the current crisis, it is the economic downturn itself that is making the target seem over-ambitious. EURACTIV Hungary reports. ''Hungary also sees innovation, research and development as one of the main options in building our future,'' declared István Varga, Hungary's minister for national development and the economy at the time, in September 2009. Despite sharing Brussels' goal of making innovation a cross-sector priority throughout the economy, the then-socialist government decided to slash innovation funding by 20% as of 2010. According to government data, Hungary spends approximately 0.9% of its GDP on R&D and innovation each year. Tables from the Hungarian Central Statistical Office reveal that this figure represents the accumulation of all public and private entrepreneurial investment. Looking only at public resources, Hungary spent €0.4 billion on R&D in 2008 – 0.5% of GDP. In the European Commission's Innovation Scoreboard for 2009, Hungary ranked 22nd in the EU-27: a performance that made it a ''moderate innovator''. That gloomy picture offered little hope of Hungary meeting the EU's 3% R&D target in the coming years. Besides, there is almost no public debate about increasing the GDP share of R&D expenditure. Speaking to EURACTIV Hungary, Róbert Kassai, vice-president of UEAPME (the European Association of Craft, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises) outlined the four biggest problems facing R&D in Hungary. ''First and foremost, everything needs to be financially supported from public money. In Hungary, however, the share of R&D resources is decreasing. Now it is under 1%, while in Western Europe it is between 3 and 7%," Kassai said. "Secondly, we would need some own resource in R&D investments, and very few of the Hungarian enterprises can secure this. Thirdly, we have narrow markets. And finally, financial resources of SMEs are conditioned with quantitative results: surplus in production or in human resources. But SMEs can not produce more as they do not have the market for it,'' he said. Kassai called for the establishment of a new system to distribute EU funds among SMEs, adding that reforming the education system would be among the main challenges facing the incoming centre-right government, Fidesz-KDNP. Slogans or actions? The newly-elected conservative government recently presented its programme to the Hungarian parliament. The document – which is largely the same as the party's elction manifesto, which has been available for months – cites innovation and creativity as a sector with ''accentuated importance''. However, very few details have emerged as to how the cabinet intends to acheive its goals. Fidesz-KDNP has pledged to create one million jobs in the next ten years – most of them with the help of SMEs. ''To achieve this, the future belongs to creative industries, and to European and global provider centres […] Big and small [companies] need […] permanent innovation, therefore there is a need for an R&D strategy and structure,'' the programme states. It underlines the importance of European Parliament and Council decisions and aims to develop "funding mechanisms for small businesses with weak research capacities''. Fidesz also says it would subsidise SMEs to enhance their capacity to defend intellectual property rights. While there has been no public debate about these parts of the programme so far, many parties have criticised the document for being too general and giving no details of how to achieve the list of goals. Ildikó Lendvai, leader of the Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP), which won a catastrophic 15.3% in the parliamentary elections, said: ''Already with the first reading, you can see that we do not get a programme, but a huge balloon, which is colourful from the outside but vague inside. A lot of slogans, very little content, more questions than answers and barely any concrete proposals,'' he said scathingly. The hearings of ministers-designate are taking place this week, so some details may emerge then. Fidesz has planned a small cabinet with only eight ministers (EURACTIV 12/05/10) and Hungarians are expecting a lot from György Matolcsy, who will be responsible for the ''national economy''. Matolcsy will present his ideas to six parliamentary committees between now and Friday (28 May). Innovation helps itself While politics does not care too much for innovation, it appears that universities do. The Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME) announced on Tuesday (25 May) that it will integrate five of its strategic research areas. The institution is widely seen as the engine of Hungarian innovation, as most foreign IT companies and the European Innovation and Technology Institute have their headquarters at the so-called 'Infopark' next to the university campus. Together with BME, four other universities have been given the title of 'elite research universities': the Eötvös Lóránd University, famous for law and arts, the health-oriented Semmelweis University, the multi-faceted University of Szeged and the University of Debrecen. The institutions plan to widen the scope of their current research activities across regional and national borders. ''The Budapest University of Technology and Economics would like to become the leading institution in innovation in Hungary, and beyond the borders we would like to become a European elite university,'' said László Vajta, dean of BME's IT department. Under their new title, the universities each received three billion forints (€1.1 billion). In their application for this funding, BME highlighted the importance of horizontal integration and put five strategic research areas at the forefront. The institution would like to develop its research activities in sustainable energies, transport and logistics, biotechnology, environmental and health research, nanophysics and nanotechnology, and last but not least, intelligent environment and e-technology. Read more with Euractiv Greek crisis brings ‘village politics’ to EUGerman Chancellor Angela Merkel played the populist card over the Greek crisis and even rode on anti-Greek prejudices shared by many Germans. Several mainstream politicians described the contagious effect across Europe as "alarming". EURACTIV's network reports. Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded Email Address * Politics Newsletters Positions“The European Commission has never proposed under the Europe 2020 Strategy a 3% goal for Hungary and will not be making such a proposal,” Mark English, spokesperson to Research and Innovation commissioner Máire Geoghegan Quinn told EURACTIV. The Commission proposed, and EU leaders agreed, that each country should set different, ambitious but realistic national targets taking into account their starting positions, he said. The exact national targets are likely to be endorsed by the European Council in June, following current discussions between the Commission and Member States, which have been going very well, he added. It is certain that for new member states, including Hungary, the final targets will be considerably under 3%, while for some of the leading countries in terms of current investment levels, they will be significantly higher than 3%, the spokesperson explained. BackgroundRaising investment in R&D to 3% of the EU's GDP is one of the five priorities of a draft ten-year economic plan unveiled by the European Commission in March, called 'Europe 2020' (EURACTIV 03/03/10). EN General lines of this plan, the specific 3% EU target and the idea of national targets were agreed by the 27 heads of state and government at the Spring European Council. The June Council will endorse the detailed draft of the integrated policy guidelines. The strategy defines five headline targets at EU level, which member states will be asked to translate into national goals reflecting their differing starting points: Raising the employment rate of the population aged 20-64 from the current 69% to 75%. Raising the investment in R&D to 3% of the EU's GDP. Meeting the EU's '20/20/20' objectives on greenhouse gas emission reduction and renewable energies. Reducing the share of early school leavers from the current 15% to under 10% and making sure that at least 40% of youngsters have a degree or diploma. Reducing the number of Europeans living below the poverty line by 25%, lifting 20 million out of poverty from the current 80 million. In a series of articles, the EURACTIV network will present the state of play in individual EU countries on each of the targets. This is the first of a series of articles on how member states react to the target of raising investment in R&D to 3% of GDP. The EURACTIV network already found that Eastern EU countries have either rejected or dismissed as irrelevant a planned EU target to reduce poverty (EURACTIV 06/05/10). Timeline 17-18 June 2010: EU summit to adopt further details of 2020 strategy, including country-specific targets. Autumn 2010: Member states to submit stability and convergence programmes, as well as national reform programmes. Further ReadingEuropean Union European Commission:Europe 2020 targets(3 Mar. 2010) European Commission:Europe 2020: Commission proposes new economic strategy in Europe(3 Mar. 2010) European Council: Conclusions(26 Mar. 2010) Press articles EURACTIV Slovakia:Ma?arsko: Cie? tri percentá HDP na vedu bude ?ažké dosiahnu?