Est. 3min 24-01-2005 (updated: 29-01-2010 ) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram The 16-17 December European Council of Brussels showed that the new member states intend to participate fully in all the European debates. MINEFI-DREE’s latest issue of Revue Elargissement sums up their positions on future EU enlargement and the new financial framework (2007-2013), two major European issues for 2005. Further enlargements: 2005 will be a decisive year in this respect. The NMS are generally in favour of pursuing the enlargement process. Bulgaria and Romania: the Treaty of Accession should be signed during the session of the “general affairs” council in April 2005, subject to the assent of the European Parliament, the actual accession being planned for January 2007. The great efforts that Romania must still make in the fields of “justice and internal affairs”, “competition” and “environment” were underlined by the European Council of Brussels, whereas Bulgaria was not subject to the same injunctions. All the NMs support the fast entry of these two “brother” states into the Union. Croatia: the accession negotiations should begin on 17th March 2005, provided Croatia fully cooperates with the International Criminal Court of the Hague. Most observers think that this condition will be met. Croatia has the support of all the NMS, even that of Slovenia, with which it has some bilateral disputes. Turkey: subject to an agreement of the Council on the “framework for negotiation”, Turkey’s accession negotiations should commence on 3rd October 2005. Before the actual negotiations begin, Turkey has committed itself to signing the protocol on the adaptation of the Ankara Agreement (a free trade agreement between the EU and Turkey, which has to be extended to the 10 NMS, including Cyprus), to the “present composition of the European Union”. Turkey must also have passed six specific laws. The framework for negotiations will have to include specific provisions for transition periods, safeguard clauses, etc. In any case, according to the Council, Turkey’s accession negotiations “can only be concluded after the setting up of the Financial Framework for the period beginning 2014”. The Republic of Cyprus is the only country among the NMS which has major difficulties with the idea of Turkey’s accession to the European Union The Union’s financial framework for the period 2007-2013: the European Council’s conclusions reflect the difficulties of the current negotiation. In concrete terms, the Council has maintained the ceiling for European resources at its current level of 1.24% of the GNI of the enlarged Union and retained the “aim of reaching a political agreement by June 2005”. Most observers doubt that this deadline will be met. As regards the financial framework, above all, the NMS want the level of expenditure for regional policy, provided for in the Commission’s proposal, to be confirmed. Some of them disagree with regional spending in each country being capped at 4% of GDP. All the NMS ask for the removal of the British rebate and the majority is hostile to the correcting mechanism of the net contributions. By Olivier LOUIS For more analyses, visit the DREE website.