The EU-Canada trade agreement enters provisionally into force on Thursday (21 September), sparking a rehash of old claims in the bloc about threats to food safety and environment.
Ahead of the fatidic date for the provisional implementation of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, or CETA, Greenpeace has underlined that Canada has weaker food safety standards than the EU. “They have an agricultural economy heavily dependent on chemical inputs and GMOs.”
“The trade deal gives North American corporations tools to weaken European standards regarding growth hormones, chemical washes, GMOs, animal cloning, and Country of Origin labelling. What they have not achieved so far, via the WTO, they can now start undermining via CETA,” said Kees Kodde, trade campaigner at Greenpeace.
The Commission has repeatedly said that there will not be a race to the bottom, either in social or in environmental protection.
But NGOs and some countries remain unconvinced. Two weeks ago, France said the trade agreement lacks ambition and actually ‘doesn’t give enough priority to health and environmental concerns.”
“CETA is off to a false start. Not only does the provisional application underline its undemocratic nature but the agreement itself remains unpopular in many countries, where parliaments are still to ratify it,” said Fabian Flues, trade campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, calling on parliamentarians across Europe to scrutinise the agreement seriously.
The EU and Canada signed the deal last October, following the EU countries’ approval. On Thursday, 90% of the agreement will enter into force. The accord scraps most customs duties, cuts prices and improves choices for consumers.
But because CETA was declared a mixed agreement by the European Commission in July 2016, it will also need to be ratified by national and regional parliaments.
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker rebutted criticism on Wednesday, saying that the EU-Canada deal has been subject to an in-depth parliamentary scrutiny which reflects the increased interest of citizens in trade policy.
“The intense exchanges on CETA throughout this process are a testimony to the democratic nature of European decision making and I expect member states to conduct an inclusive and thorough discussion in the context of the ongoing national ratification processes of the agreement,” Juncker added.
The deal explicitly protects EU governments’ “right to regulate” and the ability to set higher standards and level of protection for product and food safety, labour or the environment.
“CETA is a modern and progressive agreement, underlining our commitment to free and fair trade based on values. It helps us shape globalisation and the rules that govern global commerce,” said Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström.
Missing from CETA, for now, is the controversial investment protection clause, which gives companies the recourse to an investment court system if they believe their rights have been broken by a change in government policy.
The court system has been the source of much strife among opponents to the agreement.
On 6 September, Belgium referred the matter to the EU’s Court of Justice (ECJ), asking it to evaluate the validity of the arbitration procedure of the CETA under European law.
This late submission, however, does not concern the whole of the free trade agreement, but only the investment aspect.
There is no set timeline for when EU parliaments must vote on the agreement. The EU trade agreement with South Korea was ratified by national governments four-and-a-half years after most of the deal had already gone into effect.
