Airline carbon cap is legal, says EU’s top court lawyer


European rules forcing all airlines to pay for carbon emissions are within the law, an adviser to Europe's highest court said on Thursday (6 October), in the latest stage of a bitter battle between the European Union and the aviation industry.

From January next year, all airlines will have to buy permits under the EU's emissions trading scheme (ETS) to help cover the carbon cost of all flights that land or take off in Europe.

"EU legislation does not infringe the sovereignty of other states or the freedom of the high seas guaranteed under international law, and is compatible with the relevant international agreements," said the opinion from Advocate General Juliane Kokott.

While her opinion is not binding, the court's judges, who are expected make a final ruling early next year, usually follow an advocate general's guidance.

In turn, lawyers expect the London High Court of Justice, which referred the case brought by the Air Transport Association of America, American Airlines and United Continental to the Luxembourg court, to follow the ECJ's line.

The airlines took the case to the London court after Britain introduced national laws to implement the European directive.

Chinese and Indian airlines have also expressed vehement opposition to the EU law.

The 1997 Kyoto Protocol on combating climate change ruled countries should try to regulate aviation emissions through the industry body International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), but talks with the body have not yielded progress.

The European Union — regarded as the vanguard of efforts to reduce planet-warming emissions — therefore decided to include airlines in addition to factories, power plants and other installations in its carbon trading scheme.

The EU scheme sets a cap on the level of emissions allowed.

Utilities, factories and, from January, airlines that emit carbon above their cap have to buy carbon permits to cover these emissions. If they emit less than their limit, they can sell spare permits from their emission allowances.

European carbon prices gained as much as 2% on the news, two days after the permits touched a 31-month low of €9.82 ($13.13).

 Airlines initially would only be required to pay for 15% of the carbon they emit, and would be allocated free allowances to cover the other 85.

Depending on decisions by airlines on how much of the cost they pass on to their customers, the European Commission has calculated that would result in a cost per passenger of between 2 and 12 euros ($2.66 and $15.96) — much less than the penalty it would enforce on airlines that do not comply of 100 euros per allowance.

European Commission figures show emissions from airlines have doubled since 1990 and could triple by 2020, in contrast to emissions from most other sectors, which have been decreasing.

EURACTIV with Reuters

A statement sent to EURACTIV by the US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Transportation Affairs, Krishna R. Urs, said: "The U.S. Government is not a party to this case. However, we maintain our strong legal and policy objections to the inclusion of flights by non-EU carriers in the EU-ETS, and do not see the European Court of Justice process as resolving these objections. The United States strongly supports the goal of combating climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from aviation. We, along with several other States, intend to continue to press our European partners to exclude non-EU air carriers from the EU-ETS and instead work with us in the International Civil Aviation Organization to take additional positive steps to address this goal."

In an effort to tackle aviation's small but fast-growing contribution to climate change, the Commission issued a legislative proposal in December 2006 to include the sector in the EU's emission trading scheme (EU ETS). The proposal involves imposing a cap on CO2 emissions for all planes arriving or departing from EU airports, while allowing airlines to buy and sell 'pollution credits' on the bloc's 'carbon market'. 

The legislation takes effect in 2012. But non-EU governments and airlines have demanded exemptions, and threatened legal action or trade retaliation if this is not forthcoming. China's official aviation body, the China Air Transport Association (CATA), says that the ETS would cost its airlines $123 million in the scheme's first year, and more than triple that by 2020. The country also claims special dispensation as a developing country.

EU officials question why its businessmen should be exempted from paying the same carbon taxes that others do. The EU also allows exemptions from the ETS for governments that take equivalent measures to curb aviation emissions. But Brussels has not said what these might be in the case of the ETS. China's aviation regulator has already asked all airline carriers to cut their energy and carbon intensity by 22% by 2050.

1 january 2012: Airlines stopping in European airports to be brought into the ETS


Life Terra

Funded by the LIFE Programme of the EU

The content of this publication represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The Agency does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

Subscribe to our newsletters