EU struggles to define maritime policy

Ministers have adopted a common position on a proposed Marine Strategy Directive, opposing the Parliament on a number of important points. Meanwhile, the Commission is faced with fragmented governance structures and poor coastal surveillance, which hamper its efforts to formulate a common EU maritime policy. 

  • Marine strategy: a long road to adoption

On 23 July 2007, the Council adopted a common position on the Marine Strategy Directive, “bearing in mind that the proposal is for a Framework Directive that should not burden implementation with too much technical detail”. 

At issue is the question of determining “good environmental status”. In its first reading in November 2006, Parliament had proposed a detailed annex with conditions for assessment. Council rejects this notion, and calls instead for “generic qualitative descriptors”.  

Parliament and Council are also opposed on the issue of implementation deadlines – Parliament wants a tighter timetable – and on the legal obligations resulting from a new Directive. 

Council considers “that it would be unrealistic, no matter how desirable, to make achievement of good environmental status, even by 2021, a legally binding objective”. 

  • Maritime policy: who governs what?

Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas gave a speech in Lisbon on 19 July, offering insight on current progress towards the development of a common EU maritime policy.

Dimas cited governance  as “the  main issue that lies at the heart of a maritime policy for Europe”, in reference to the complications that can arise when different national, regional and local administrations are called upon to manage ecosystems that cut across administrative boundaries. 

“Governance as a process of policy management is a complex issue at the best of times,” Dimas said. “It becomes even more so within the current European set-up, because what we are talking about runs through very different levels of decision-making: the EU, national administrations and those who operate at a regional level.”

The Commission, which will present an action plan on the issue in October, faces a number of specific challenges, including accurate data collection, proper spatial planning of coastal regions and maritime surveillance (vessel tracking).

Read more with Euractiv

Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded

Greenpeace welcomed the proposed Marine Strategy Directive as "long-overdue", but criticised that it "falls far short of expectations and fails to establish the overarching framework needed to apply an ecosystem approach to the management of Europe's seas". 

The NGO reacted with "disappointment" to the Council's common position, and predicted that the dossier will go into conciliation, as the Parliament is expected to remain firm on the majority of its amendments.

In October 2005, the Commission proposed a Marine Strategy Directive in order to achieve a "good environmental status" of Europe's seas and oceans by 2021. 

Under the proposed law, member states must draw up and implement national coastal protection programmes in coordination with other nations which share the same waters. This is the so-called "ecosystem approach", whereby coastal environments are identified and managed based on biological rather than national boundaries. (EURACTIV 25/10/05)

In June 2006, the Commission adopted a Green Paper for an EU maritime policy, launching a one-year consultation that closed on 30 June 2007. The purpose of the policy is to create a single framework for managing a range of maritime issues, from fishing, mineral extraction and environmental protection to job security (EURACTIV 31/03/06).

  • Oct 2007: Commission to present an action plan for a common EU maritime policy.
  • Dec 2007: European Council - Commission hopes for a political agreement on maritime policy.

Supporter


Life Terra

Funded by the LIFE Programme of the EU

The content of this publication represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The Agency does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.




Check out all Euractiv's Projects here

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe