Hinkley nuclear reactor project gains EU approval, leak reveals

Hinckley Point nuclear power plant [Wikimedia]

Green groups condemn commissioner Almunia’s U-turn, as the EU competition czar deems Hinkley Point C subsidies to be within state aid rules.

British plans for a nuclear renaissance centred on a nuclear reactor in Somerset achieved a breakthrough when a nine-month European Union state aid investigation ended with a call for Brussels to approve the project.

The EU’s competition commissioner, Joaquín Almunia, had expressed scepticism that the Hinkley Point C scheme could satisfy the EU’s stringent state aid criteria after the UK government agreed to underwrite the project with a loan guarantee and a commitment on the price of the electricity generated by the power station.

But the commissioner appears to have been persuaded that the proposed £17.6bn of subsidies are legal under bloc rules, despite the lack of a competitive tendering process. Hinkley Point will be operated by EDF, the French state-owned company, while two Chinese state-owned nuclear companies have agreed to help fund the plant.

A spokesman for Almunia told the Guardian that after discussions with the UK authorities, he would “propose to the college of commissioners to take a positive decision and in principle the decision should be taken during this mandate of the commission in October”. It follows a meeting between the energy minister, Ed Davey, and Almunia in Brussels last Wednesday. UK sources refused to be drawn on the nature of any agreement reached between them, and cautioned that nothing has yet been decided.

The leak from Almunia’s office was seen by some analysts as unorthodox – no public announcement is usually made until a decision has been agreed.

According to EU protocol, the proposal from the investigating team will now go to a college of EU commissioners for a final decision next month.

Some of them, such as the German energy commissioner, Günther Oettinger, who once described the 35-year length of the proposed Hinkley contract as “soviet”, may require convincing.

Aled Williams, a UK government spokesman in Brussels, said: “We are continuing to engage with the commission as it progresses its assessment of the Hinkley Point C state aid case and are confident of a decision under the mandate of this commission.”

But British pressure related to the UK’s electoral timetable – and the potential for an easy campaigning hit for Ukip – may have led Almunia to backtrack from his previous misgivings, according to some environmentalists. “If Almunia has backed state aid for Hinkley, it risks a backroom deal prevailing over the rule of law,” said Mark Breddy, a spokesman for Greenpeace Europe. “Only a year ago the commission said that Hinkley was ‘in principle incompatible under EU state aid rules’. Now, under pressure from the UK government and French nuclear operator EDF, the commission is preparing to perform a U-turn.”

The president of the Green parliamentary group in Brussels, Rebecca Harms, said she was disappointed with the investigation’s outcome.

“It is unbelievable that Commissioner Almunia wants to wave through this obviously illegal state aid to finance Hinkley Point,” she said. “It is like the bursting of a dam – other countries will want to follow. The financing of such outdated, dirty and highly risky technology should be averted by all means.”

However, the Confederation of British Industry hailed news of what could be the first British nuclear plant in a generation. “This deal has been a long time in the making, and will play a significant role in further securing and decarbonising our energy supply,” said Nicola Walker, the CBI’s business enviroment director. “We hope it will also help kickstart a new nuclear build programme, creating jobs for tens of thousands of people.”

If built, Hinkley would be the first British nuclear reactor since Sizewell B in 1995. Because of the 35-year length of its operating contract, and the 10 years it would take to build, its cost and policy implications stretch far into the future.

“It would be the beginning of the end of the single energy market in Europe,” said Mark Johnston, an external adviser to the European Policy Centre thinktank. “If member states are free to purchase any power plant with long-term subsidies, then there is no longer a role for companies to judge investments.”

The government has offered EDF a “strike price” of £92.50 per megawatt hour for Hinkley, roughly twice the current wholesale price. It has also offered £10bn in loan guarantees. It is providing a range of incentives, including support for wind power and biomass, to attract £110bn needed to replace current generating capacity and upgrade the national grid.

Our editors’ picks for the day’s top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.

Commissioner Almunia was today (23 September) questioned by Green MEPs on the reports on the Hinkley C state aid case in the European Parliament's economic and monetary affairs committee. Commenting on the reports, UK Green MEP and economics spokesperson Molly Scott Cato said: "There can be no doubt that the generous deal being offered by the UK government to EDF on Hinkley C amounts to illegal state aid under EU rules (1). It would be a scandal if the European Commission decided to turn a blind eye as some kind of naive sop to David Cameron and the Tory-led government, with a view to rallying their support for Europe.

"This huge implicit subsidy for Hinkley will make it impossible for those who generate electricity in a clean and sustainable way to compete. As such, it has potentially massive implications for the EU energy market and the goal to boost the share of clean, safe and home-grown renewable energies, and the domestic jobs they create. Regardless of what commissioner Almunia recommends, this deal requires the approval of the entire college of EU commissioners. We are urging those commissioners sceptical of this deal to make their voices heard and ensure this illegal state aid is not waved through. We will also be rallying cross-party support in the European Parliament against this retrograde move."


Life Terra

Funded by the LIFE Programme of the EU

The content of this publication represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The Agency does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

Subscribe to our newsletters