Ombudsman opens inquiry into EU Commission’s gas stance

EU Ombudsman Emily O'Reilly (C) has raised doubts about the Commission's energy due-diligence. [Photo: EC]

The EU Ombudsman announced on Thursday (13 February) it has opened an inquiry into the European Commission’s catalogue of priority energy projects, after green activists lodged a complaint about the inclusion of new gas infrastructure on the list.

Emily O’Reilly, the EU Ombudsman, wrote to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen earlier this week requesting clarifications about the inclusion of gas projects in the so-called fourth EU list of Projects of Common Interests (PCI).

The inquiry follows a complaint lodged by Food & Water Europe, a civil society group, which claims that the EU executive did not adequately assess the sustainability of the 32 gas projects included on the list and as such has broken EU law.

Food & Water Europe are not the first ones to object to the list, a litany of NGOs have campaigned against it, as well as Hollywood actor Mark Ruffalo.

But the reply the Commission sent to the group actually appears to have forced the Ombudsman’s hand. “It is clear from the Commission’s reply to the complainant that it has started work to improve the analytical tools and procedures it has in place to carry out a sustainability assessment of possible future gas projects,” O’Reilly said in her letter.

“However, [it] can be understood as an admission that there were shortcomings in relation to past sustainability assessments of PCI status,” the Ombudsman explained, adding that her inquiry will focus on if and how the Commission took sustainability into account when drawing up the list in the first place.

To that end the EU watchdog asks the Commission’s services to explain when they first realised the sustainability assessment needed a review and whether any gas projects had ever fulfilled the criteria included in the PCI list’s dedicated regulation.

Under that piece of legislation, a project only has to satisfy one of four criteria to be eligible for a place on the list: market integration, security of supply, competition and sustainability.

This risks “undermining public trust in the EU’s ability to establish the PCI-list in a manner that is in line with the EU’s energy policy and climate objectives,” the Ombudsman warns in the letter.

O’Reilly also asks the Commission to explain whether it has assessed oil projects in a correct fashion, admitting in her letter that the extra clarification is of her own initiative because it “is implicit in the complaint”.

The EU executive has until 31 March to provide a written reply to the three queries.

Billions to be wasted on ‘unnecessary’ gas projects, study says

Europe does not need new gas infrastructure to safeguard security of supply, according to a new study by industry consultants Artelys, which warns that there is a risk of €29 billion being wasted on 32 mostly “unnecessary” gas projects.

PCI promises

Members of the European Parliament on Wednesday (12 February) voted in large numbers to approve the fourth PCI list, striking down an objection tabled by the Greens and supported by the leftwing  GUE/NGL group.

But a majority of lawmakers from other political groups combined forces to nix the resolution, citing the need to secure energy supplies and complete the bloc’s Energy Union. MEPs who voted against the resolution hail from the centre-right EPP, the socialist S&D, the centrist Renew Europe, the conservative ECR and the far-right ID group.

Pascal Canfin, a French MEP who chairs the Parliament’s environment committee, threw his weight behind the Commission’s fourth PCI list, lauding a promise from EU climate chief Frans Timmermans to only fund projects that are in line with the EU’s climate objectives. The Frenchman also highlighted the importance of renewable energy projects on the list, arguing those should not be delayed any longer.

But Green MEP Bas Eickhout retorted on Twitter that the European Green Deal championed by Timmermans does not suggest banning gas outright, and criticised Canfin for “missing the opportunity to draw a line”.

After the Green resolution was defeated, Eickhout applauded the Ombudsman’s involvement on the issue, saying “the Parliament failed to use its scrutiny powers”.

The European Environmental Bureau (EEB), a green campaign group, told EURACTIV that the Parliament’s vote “seriously dented the EU’s climate credentials” but welcomed Timmermans’ pledge and O’Reilly’s inquiry as “extra insurance”.

Energy Commissioner Kadri Simson has also confirmed that she intends to oversee a review  later this year of the TEN-E regulation on cross-border energy infrastructure, while the European Investment Bank will tighten up its gas-criteria as of 2021.

Parliament backs EU list of energy projects, ignoring Greens

The European Parliament voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday (12 February) against a motion to reject a proposed list of priority energy projects, ignoring the demands of Greens and leftists who warned against funding new gas infrastructure that risks being stranded as Europe moves to a zero-carbon economy.

[Edited by Frédéric Simon]


Life Terra

Funded by the LIFE Programme of the EU

The content of this publication represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The Agency does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

Subscribe to our newsletters