Radiation surveillance detects iodine leak in Europe

If the leak had come from a nuclear power station, other substances would also have been detected. [B@rberousse/Flickr]

Nobody knows who released the substance, but radioactive iodine has been detected across Europe in recent weeks. EURACTIV’s partner Journal de l’Environnement reports.

The technicians of Europe’s informal network of radioactivity surveillance experts, the Ring of Five, were the only ones to notice the spike in radiation levels. In the second week of January, the alert sounded in the north of Norway, with traces of iodine 131 detected in the air.

Other observations followed in Finland, Poland, the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain and France, according to the French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN).

In France, levels of iodine-131 did not exceed 0.31 microbecquerel per cubic meter of air (μBq / m3), according to the IRSN, a thousand times less than the levels recorded following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

Iodine-131 is a radionuclide with a half-life of just over 8 days. So for it to have been detected, it must have been released shortly before. The source of the substance is still unknown.

Difficult modelling

But suspicions are rife. “We are leading the inquiry,” said Jean-Christophe Gariel, from the IRSN. “This means we are essentially reversing the trajectory of the iodine pollution in order to find out where it came from. But taking into account the weather in recent weeks, it will not be easy to model.”

The type of radioactive pollution means nuclear power stations can be struck off the list of possible suspects.

“We have only detected iodine. If there had been an accident, like the ones in Fukushima or Chernobyl, we would have had leaks of other substances, like caesium,” Gariel said.

Among the theories considered most likely is that a manufacturer of medical radio-isotopes, probably in Eastern Europe, suffered a leak. This incident closely resembles an episode from 2011, when the Budapest isotopes institute released – legally and harmlessly – an amount of radioactive iodine into the environment.

At the time, this caused a big stir in the European radiological protection community.

Pressed to comment on the spike in radiation levels, the European Commission sent the following statement to EURACTIV on 24 February:

"We are aware of the reported measurements and will continue to monitor the developments, and liaise with the national authorities as appropriate.

We also note that the measured levels pose no potential threat to human health.


The EU has put in place a comprehensive regime regarding radiation protection. The main tool for this is the  Basic Safety Standards Directive. The Commission oversees the correct implementation of this directive, which was reinforced following Fukushima with an amended Directive in 2013 (this directive will enter into force next year).

The EU has many more tools of overseeing an actual issue would be detected and appropriately handled/coordinated:

  • The Article 35 Euratom Treaty procedure – where the Commission actually goes and checks radiation monitoring systems either at specific sites, or at the national level.
  • The Article 37 Euratom Treaty procedure – where the Commission checks any plans for discharges of radioactive affluents for potential cross border effects.
  • The European Radiological Data Exchange Platform system, which is an interactive exchange between all responsible authorities and maintained by the Commission, providing speedy information in case of an emergency (also publicly accessible).
  • We have extensive procedures in place in case of an actual emergency or potential threat to public health for a coordinated response and exchange of information.

In addition, there is also a regulation regarding food & feed (where we have the possibility to intervene in case of potential contamination)."


Life Terra

Funded by the LIFE Programme of the EU

The content of this publication represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The Agency does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

Subscribe to our newsletters