Spain’s ‘luxurious’ gas infrastructure under the spotlight

The regasification plant of El Musel, in Gijón, has never been opened. The project was approved in December 2008, “in a context in which there were great prospects for energy demand growth in Spain”, says Enagás, who owns the facility. []

Gas power plants in Spain are running below 25% capacity, according to an investigation published in the Spanish media on Wednesday (23 October), sparking calls from environmentalists to stop funding the country’s “oversized” gas infrastructure.

The investigation published by eldiario, an online news site, reveals how Spain came to have “the most luxurious gas infrastructure” in Europe, with massive overcapacity largely funded by the taxpayer, the Spanish paper said.

Since the start of the century, Spain has built more than 50 combined cycle power plants (CCGTs) – the highest number in Europe after Britain and Italy.

However, those plants were only used at less than 17% of their capacity over the seven years from 2011 to 2018, the investigation revealed. So far in 2019, they have been operating at 24.3% capacity.

Other questionable infrastructure projects include a €400 million regasification plant at the port of El Musel, in northern Spain, which was given the green light in December 2008 but has not been used since.

More than 40% of domestic gas bills in Spain go towards maintaining gas infrastructure, even when it is under-utilised, campaigners say. For industrial users, the proportion is 70%, the investigation found.

The investigation was published just as the European Gas Regulatory Forum, also known as the Madrid Forum, opened in the Spanish capital on Wednesday.

Environmentalists say tackling natural gas emissions will be crucial to bringing EU emission down to net-zero by 2050. With increasing competition from renewables and batteries, gas consumption will inevitably go down, they warn, questioning the need for building new infrastructure.

“It is the government’s responsibility to ensure the citizen does not pay twice: bearing climate impacts and the costs of under-utilised infrastructure,” said Lisa Fischer from climate think tank E3G.

A Green Deal for Europe will fail unless it confronts natural gas

The European Commission’s upcoming Green Deal should put an economy-wide target for net-zero emissions by 2050 into law, as well as provide a clear decarbonisation trajectory for the gas sector in line with the Paris Agreement, write Jonathan Gaventa and Lisa Fischer.

‘A bridge’

Miguel Arias Cañete, the EU Commissioner for climate action and energy, has warned that gas pipelines could become “stranded assets” as Europe moves to a zero-carbon economy. But he has also said gas will play “an important role in the energy transition” by acting as “a bridge to decarbonise the economy“.

Natural gas is indeed 50% less carbon-intensive than coal when combusted into power plants. And the increase in CO2 price seen on the EU  carbon market is expected to hasten “a major switch from coal to gas” in countries like Spain, Italy Germany and the Netherlands, according to a report published last year by Carbon Tracker, a think tank.

But questions remain about what will happen to gas facilities after 2030, when demand is expected to decline as Europe moves to low-carbon energy sources. In Spain, gas for electricity generation will be completely displaced by renewables by 2040, according to  Bloomberg NEF.

In the meantime, construction of new gas pipelines and LNG terminals continues at pace in Spain and across Europe, with new connections being built to complete the EU’s internal gas market, reduce price volatility and enhance energy security.

By the end of 2018, there were 87,699 kilometres of pipelines in Spain, including 691km for distribution and 61km for transport, that were added recently, according to eldiario.

Greens furious as EU pours €130m into Polish LNG terminal

The European Commission has approved EU funding worth €130 million to expand a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal in northwest Poland, triggering the ire of green activists who denounce continuous EU support for fossil fuel projects.

“Energy infrastructure has several decades of lifetime. It determines Europe’s energy system of the future. That’s why we must increase our investment in renewables rather than deepen our dependency on fossil fuels,” said Jörg Mühlenhoff from Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, an environmental NGO.

Activists are worried that a similar story is about to unfold elsewhere in Europe, where the European Commission has recently earmarked 55 gas projects eligible for EU funding under its 4th list of Projects of Common Interest (PCI).

In the coming weeks, the European Investment Bank (EIB) is also expected to decide on its new energy funding strategy, with the aim of aligning the bank’s lending with the EU’s draft climate neutrality target for 2050.

“We waste EU resources and money on gas and pollute the climate. This has to end,” said Michael Bloss, a Green MEP from Germany. “Sun and wind can lead Spain into a new renaissance, create jobs and a stable future that is free of the clutches of fossil fuels. Big scale solar needs serious investments, for Spain and for our climate.”

EU bank kicks climate can down road to November 

The European Investment Bank decided on Tuesday (15 October) to delay a decision on updating its energy lending policy until November. Germany and the European Commission are still pushing for controversial changes to the bank’s original fossil-fuel-free proposal.

Spanish gas is the second most expensive in Europe, according to eldario’s investigation, which highlighted the following costs:

  • Maintenance of the regasification plant of El Musel in Gijon, northern Spain, which has never been used (€23.6m in 2019).
  • Compensation to Algerian company Sonatrach for price revisions (€33m a year from 2015)
  • Accumulated system deficit since 2014 (more than €100m in 2019)
  • A debt of €1,350m for the failed Castor gas storage facility.

[Edited by Zoran Radosavljevic]


Life Terra

Funded by the LIFE Programme of the EU

The content of this publication represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The Agency does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

Subscribe to our newsletters