Commission opens investigation into Amazon’s handling of data

The Commission said its investigation would focus on Amazon's agreements with sellers and its use of data in choosing winners. [Shutterstock]

The European Commission decided on Wednesday (17 July) to launch an antitrust investigation into US online retailer Amazon over its use of merchants’ data, in a case that could set a precedent.

The Commission said its investigation would focus on Amazon’s standard agreements with marketplace sellers and its use of data in choosing winners of the “buy box”, which allows consumers to add items from a specific retailer directly to their shopping carts.

EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, who can fine companies up to 10% of their global turnover, said the issue was crucial as more and more Europeans shop online.

“E-commerce has boosted retail competition and brought more choice and better prices. We need to ensure that large online platforms don’t eliminate these benefits through anti-competitive behaviour,” she said.

After attacking Google, Vestager now turns to Amazon

The European Commission suspects the e-commerce giant of using the data it collects from third-party vendors on its marketplace to gain a commercial advantage. An article by our partner, La Tribune.

The EU executive has been seeking feedback from retailers and manufacturers since September into Amazon’s dual role as a marketplace for merchants and acting as a competitor following complaints from traders about Amazon’s practices.

Amazon said it would cooperate fully with the EU investigation. The company reached a deal with Germany’s antitrust authority on Wednesday to overhaul its terms of service for third-party merchants.

Under Amazon’s terms of service for Europe, merchants grant Amazon “royalty-free” rights to use in a range of ways their materials, such as technology, trademarks, content and product information.

The EU probe has some parallels with the Commission’s investigation of Google for giving illegal advantage in search results to its own comparison shopping service, said Ian Giles, a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright.

“There have been concerns around the world that competition authorities have failed to appreciate the market power that comes from ownership of data,” he said.

Vestager: 'I’d like a Facebook that I pay, with full privacy'

In an exclusive interview, the EU’s antitrust chief, Margrethe Vestager, told that the US social network Facebook is on her radar screen but not the e-commerce giant Amazon, which is also suspected of abusing its dominant position.


In Amazon’s case, the Commission needed to show “the standard agreements with retailers were anti-competitive in somehow allowing Amazon to use the data to manipulate market outcomes, or that Amazon had in some way abused its dominance.”

The Commission had been struggling to define the market in which Amazon operates in order to identify where the competitive harm could have been, sources said.

They said the issue was whether to look at Amazon in the overall retail market or in its own niche.

This is the third time the Commission has Amazon in the crosshairs. Two years ago, the institution told the e-commerce giant to pay back taxes of about €250 million to Luxembourg because of illegal tax benefits.

That same year it settled with the regulator over its distribution deals with e-book publishers in Europe.

Commission orders Amazon to pay €250 million in back taxes

The European Commission ordered Luxembourg on Wednesday (4 October) to recover unpaid taxes worth around €250 million from the online sales giant Amazon, saying the country had granted Amazon’s European arm “undue tax benefit” by allowing it to shift profits to a tax-exempt shell company.


The Commission may take a tougher approach this time to set a precedent for other platforms providing a marketplace whilst competing with their own products, Ioannis Lianos, professor of global competition law and public policy at University College London, said.

To send a strong message, the Commission may rule that an infringement of competition law has taken place rather than settle with Amazon, he said.

“I think the Commission will want to give a strong message because it’s one of the first cases to bring this issue,” Lianos said. “My feeling is that the Commission’s interest is not to settle but to take an infringement decision to lay down the law clearly and set a precedent.”

Subscribe to our newsletters