Monti criticises Franco-German ideas on industrial policy

The Competition Commissioner challenged attempts by Paris and Berlin to create ‘European champions’ at the AmCham EU competition conference on 15 June 2004.

Subscribe now to our newsletter EU Elections Decoded

Following his recent meeting with committees of the French
Senate, which was held behind closed doors, EU Competition
Commissioner Mario Monti expressed his views on competition policy
versus a 'pro-active industrial policy'.

Germany and France have recently proposed the creation of
'European industrial champions', an idea which was also formulated
by the former French Finance Minister Dominique Strauss-Kahn in his
recently published report on 'Construire l'Europe Politique - 50
propositions pour l'Europe de demain' (see

). Some politicians have
complained that EU mergers have been made more difficult, thereby
facilitating subsequent takeovers by North American companies.

Apparently preaching to the converted - mainly international law
firms and US corporate representatives - the commissioner drew
support for his market-based philosophy, tenaciously defending
current EU policy.

Monti is of the opinion that "the French debate is wrong", and
that "the debate is limited to France and Germany". Moreover, he
stated that competition could facilitate, rather than prevent,
merger and acquisition activity across European borders. Indeed, in
his view, markets do open up and only a few mergers have been
turned down by the Commission.

Moreover, Monti drew attention to the fact that 'national
champions' have not always proven successful. While examples like
Vivendi Universal have shown that they do not necessarily make for
thriving businesses, in other cases, consumers and taxpayers run
the risk of facing increased prices or subsidies.

Monti's colleague Frits Bolkestein expressed similar views. In a
recent article in the Financial Times, he attacked France and
Germany for their approach to industrial policy, saying that the
two governments used current fears about deindustrialisation as an
excuse to reinforce state interventionism (see

).

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe