Does the ePrivacy Regulation set a high standard for the confidentiality of electronic communications, or is it a far-reaching expansion of government surveillance authority?
While the ePR is intended to protect the confidentiality of calls, emails, texts and chats, the ePR’s article 11 provides a public interest exception (the “wiretap provisions”) that allows member states to pass laws giving government investigators access to these communications.
EURACTIV and Microsoft organised a lively debate to discuss how to connect the dots of ePrivacy Regulation, government surveillance, encryption and e-Evidence.
– How aligned is the ePR with other recent measures that touch on government access to communications data, such as the European Electronic Communications Code, new national surveillance laws and the e-Evidence package?
– When should intercept obligations apply to new technologies such as apps, smart speakers and game consoles?
– What are the lessons learned from recent ECJ decisions on surveillance?
– Are rules related to communications encryption necessary?
Click here to watch the full conference.
>> Click here for more information about the event.
>> Click here to check out our upcoming events.