A special meeting of NATO ambassadors on Friday (4 September) condemned the poisoning of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny as an “unacceptable breach of international law” and announced “consultations on further steps regarding Russia”. It, however, stopped short of sanctions like in the 2018 Skripal case.
Western leaders have demanded answers from the Kremlin after Berlin earlier this week revealed “unequivocal evidence” that Navalny had been afflicted by the infamous Soviet-era nerve agent Novichok.
The same substance was used against Russian ex-double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury, England in 2018, and Germany’s claim prompted widespread condemnation.
The Skripal case, considered the first offensive use of chemical weapons in Europe since World War II, had prompted NATO to cut the size of its Russian mission by a third from 30 to 20, removing accreditation from seven Russian accredited staff and rejecting three other pending applications.
Back then, Stoltenberg called the move “a clear and very strong message that there was a cost to Russia’s reckless actions”.
The move came after more than 20 western allies ordered the expulsion of dozens of Russian diplomats in response to the nerve agent attack in the UK in a show of solidarity that so far represents the biggest blow to Russian intelligence networks in the West since the Cold War.
NATO had made a similar move in 2015, in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea. Before that, there were 60 personnel at its Belgian headquarters.
EU hesitant on sanctions
At the same time, the EU said the use of chemical weapons “is completely unacceptable under any circumstances (and) constitutes a serious breach of international law and international human rights standards.”
EU’s chief diplomat Josep Borrell earlier on Thursday (3 September) called on Moscow to cooperate with an international probe into the poisoning and said the bloc would not rule out sanctions.
The European Commission said on Thursday (3 September), the bloc could slap new sanctions on Moscow only after a probe reveals who was responsible for what Germany says was the deliberate poisoning.
[Edited by Benjamin Fox]