German police are investigating the Bonn office of Axel Voss, the MEP leading the controversial copyright directive through the European Parliament, after he was the subject of a bomb threat last week, according to local media reports.
Bonn police spokesperson Simon Rott revealed to regional media outlet, the General-Anzeiger on Friday (15 March), that a threat was posted online, saying that an explosive device had been placed at Voss’s Bonn office, and it would be detonated should the EU Parliament vote to back the proposed copyright reforms.
MEPs will vote for the final time on the divisive copyright plans at the Parliament’s final plenary session next week.
The message had originally been posted on an obscure Finnish Linux Forum, before being brought to wider attention on Reddit. It has since been removed while an investigation by regional police takes place.
The copyright reform has been surrounded by controversy since its inception over two years ago. It faces one last hurdle before the measures are formally adopted.
The two most contentious items in the Copyright Directive have centered around Articles 13 and 11.
Article 13 obliges internet platforms to create filters that monitor user uploads to ensure copyright isn’t breached. Under the agreed draft, large platforms must make their best efforts to secure licenses for user-uploaded content and must do everything they can to ensure that content which breaches copyright is never uploaded online.
Article 11, meanwhile, obliges internet platforms that post snippets of information – such as Google News – to contract a license from the original publisher. Republishing more than “single words or very short extracts” will require a license.
Throughout the legislative procedure, MEPs backing the proposal have complained of being targeted by waves of vitriol, both human-generated and, reportedly, also by bots.
Last year, the Financial Times reported that Voss had been targeted with “death threats” through spam email, with the German reportedly being hit with over 60,000 automated messages in the run up to a Parliamentary vote on the plans last year.
Meanwhile, Socialist MEP Virginie Rozière has described the lobbying around the copyright directive as ‘virulent’ and says she has been in receipt of tens of thousands of spam emails.
However, on the other side of the debate, anti-copyright advocates were outraged recently when a statement from the European Commission referred to them as a “mob,” prompting a cross-party group of MEPs to demand a response from the EU’s executive branch.
With my colleagues @YanaToom, @Senficon & Ms Kammerevert I field an official urgent request to the @EU_Commission on #MobGate
We want to know:
Who authorised the publication of the Blogpost calling Europeans a mob?
Full request attached #Artikel13 #Article13 #SaveYourInternet pic.twitter.com/6dBiSjetDP
— Tiemo Wölken🇪🇺 (@woelken) February 20, 2019
Moreover, Green MEP Julia Reda, one of the staunchest of the anti-copyright campaigners was “deeply offended” following the Commission’s comparison of those in opposition to the copyright plans to campaigners who sought to mislead voters as part of the Brexit debate.
The criticism led Vice-President for the Digital Single Market, Andrus Ansip, to distance himself from the language used in the Commission’s communication. Responding to a statement from Reda, Ansip said: “I’m as angry as you about this. Nothing to do with this article. This kind of language is inexcusable.”
In response to the bomb threat allegations levelled at MEP Axel Voss last week, Reda herself condemned the level of malice that has surfaced during the copyright debate.
“The debate on article 13 is firm in the matter, as a lot is at stake, emotions can run high,” she said.
“But it must be clear to all that personal insults are inappropriate – and threats against politicians must be condemned.”
Ilias Konteas, Executive Director of the European Newspaper Publishers‘ Association, an active player in the copyright debate, chimed in, saying that he “condemns such threats and everyone interested in a fair and democratic debate should do so as well.”
Axel Voss, meanwhile, has not responded to EURACTIV’s request for a comment. The investigation continues.