EU anti-terrorism chief: Communications should be accessible to security services

The European Union should consider forcing Internet firms to help security services tap into coded emails and calls as part of a new strategy to combat militant attacks, the EU counter-terrorism coordinator says.

The controversial proposal appears in a briefing paper from Gilles de Kerchove for EU interior ministers meeting next week which was reviewed by Reuters. The confidential document, drawn up after this month’s Islamist violence in Paris, puts forward a range of areas in which EU states can improve their cooperation.

De Kerchove noted that scandal over US spying on global networks had prompted companies to offer more encryption. This can thwart official monitoring, even where police have warrants.

Stressing that any measures must respect fundamental rights, he wrote: “The Commission should be invited to explore rules obliging Internet and telecommunications companies operating in the EU to provide … access of the relevant national authorities to communications (ie share encryption keys).”

>>Read: EU considers foreign ‘security agents’ to counter terrorism

A spokesman for de Kerchove declined to comment on the paper.


A proposal by British Prime Minister David Cameron that firms share encryption keys was condemned by civil liberties groups. Some also questioned its technical feasibility.

De Kerchove’s suggestion drew criticism from Jan Philipp Albrecht, a Greens member from Germany, who accused him of reaching for “the toolbox of repressive regimes … by asking for a back-door way into encrypted communication”.

In an interview with Reuters this week, de Kerchove insisted: “No one wants to turn Europe into a police state or a Big Brother society.”

>>Read: Anti-terrorist measures in EU go in all directions

But, pointing to demonstrations this month in support of victims, he said there was a popular desire across Europe to tackle radical groups and prevent young men traveling to fight for militants in Syria and returning to mount attacks at home.

De Kerchove, a Belgian lawyer who has held his role since 2007, also told Reuters he recommended governments withdraw the passports and travel rights of people suspected of planning to go abroad to fight with Islamic State: “It’s like driving a car without a license,” he said. “You don’t have to demonstrate the intention of the driver or where the car is going.”

De Kerchove said he expected governments to adopt an EU approach that would build on improving cooperation under systems already available, such as for Europe’s passport-free Schengen travel zone, and on existing institutions such as Europol and Interpol. The need for new legislation was limited, he said.

The European Union has pledged closer cooperation in the fight against terrorism following the killing at Charlie Hebdo and subsequent attacks in Paris, in which 17 people were killed.

Two priority tracks were identified following a meeting of EU Home Affairs Ministers held in Paris on 11 January:

  • Hampering the travel movements of terrorists, including so-called “foreign fighters” and European nationals crossing the EU’s external borders.
  • Countering terrorist propaganda, particularly on the Internet, in order to tackle the root causes of radicalisation among young people.

One key issue to be discussed is a proposal for EU states to share records of air passengers – or PNR – a measure that has been held up in the European Parliament over privacy concerns.

>> Read our LinksDossier: From 9/11 to Charlie Hebdo: The EU’s response to terrorism

Subscribe to our newsletters