Parliament backs major telecoms, Internet overhaul

[Shutterstock]

The European Parliament yesterday (24 September) approved a broad revision of the rules governing the Internet and telecoms sectors in a bid to boost competition and offer a wider range of services to consumers. Some provisions originally proposed by the Commission have been watered down. 

A weaker EU authority

By approving the report drafted by Conservative MEP Pilar del Castillo Vera, MEPs rejected the Commission’s proposal to establish a strong new EU authority for the telecoms sector. EECMA (the European Electronic Communication Market Authority) would have supervised the 27 national regulatory authorities, under the control of the Commission.

The body would notably have had the power to block remedies imposed by national regulators if they contradicted European principles: a plan staunchly opposed by national regulators.

Instead, MEPs voted in favour of a less-centralised Body of European Regulators in Telecoms (BERT), which would share veto powers with the Commission. BERT would in fact be a strengthened version of the current ERG (European Regulators Group), which currently represents national authorities (EURACTIV 09/07/08). Nevertheless, in a positive move for EU enthusiasts, decisions by BERT would be taken by a qualified majority of two thirds rather than unanimously. 

Functional separation in ‘exceptional’ cases

While MEPs endorsed a proposal requiring telecoms operators to split their network business from their retail services – known as ‘functional separation’, which the Commission hopes will boost competition in national markets – they insisted that such a measure be only “exceptionally” applied, requiring approval by both the EU executive and the European regulatory body.


Spurring investment in next-generation networks

Upgrading the original Commission proposal, Parliament proposed a series of measures to spur investment in next-generation optical fibre networks, which are expected to become the backbone of the Internet of the future, offering high-speed, high-definition services.

At the request of Socialist MEP Catherine Trautmann, who drafted the report on the issue, Parliament voted in favour of infrastructure competition, pushing all operator to build its own network. 

The move was welcomed by large incumbent companies but criticised by smaller ones due to fears that they will be weakened. But the text makes a concession to smaller market entrants by recognising the right of operators without any infrastructure of their own to access existing fibre networks. 

Spectrum management

A review of current rules governing radio spectrum is considered key to offering a new range of services to European citizens, from mobile internet to widespread interactive television. The review is geared towards better exploiting the ‘digital dividend’, meaning radio frequencies freed by the gradual transition from analogical services to digital ones.

To do this, the Parliament agreed that management and allocation of the spectrum should be left mainly up to member states, with only some frequencies under European management. This triggered wide support from the broadcasting industry, which considers it easier to get its voice heard by national authorities than by a one-size-fits-all European model. 

The telecoms sector and the cable industry were less happy, with the former lamenting that new mobile phone-based services will not be favoured by the new framework and the later criticising the extension of ‘must-carry’ obligations to all audiovisual media services, including satellite and cable. They say this will hinder the development of on-demand services.  

Privacy, security, copyright and consumer protection

The Parliament also made a number of changes to the Commission’s proposals to improve privacy and security on the Web. 

The idea of transforming internet service providers into a sort of online police service, filtering all downloads and punishing serial anti-piracy rulebreakers, was dumped after strong pressure from the telecoms industry and consumer support for free downloading and peer-to-peer websites.

What’s more, MEPs decided that the processing of personal data should not require the prior consent of the user – a move that will make life easier for anti-hacker operators but keep privacy protection on the Web low.

MEPs also side-stepped the issue of whether IP addresses – which are crucial for the identification by service providers of Internet users and through which Web giants can acquire much user information – should be considered as personal data.

On the other hand, they approved the application of a prior consent clause to software that automatically reports back to remote computers, such as cookies, which are installed in users’ computers and provide information on their behaviour to the companies that create them, like search engines. With this legislation in place, cookies and other software based on this principle will have to ask users’ permission to report back. However, providing a simple button in the browser for the acceptance of cookies should be sufficient, raising doubts as to the effective protection of consumers’ privacy.

According to Liberal MEP Alexander Alvaro, who proposed the measure, making it a duty to report security breaches would be enough to provide internet users with maximum protection.

The review also includes higher transparency requirements for the pricing of electronic services and better contractual information. “Too often, consumers are not told if they will be required to pay significant sums for their handset if they break a contract early or if services such as Skype are blocked on their handsets. All this will now change,” explained Conservative MEP Malcolm Harbour, who drafted the report approved in the Parliament plenary.

Read more with Euractiv

EU Information Society Commissioner Viviane Reding accepted Parliament's changes to her original proposals: "Today's vote is good news for European consumers. The European Parliament has today voted in favour of a strong and competitive single telecoms market without borders for cross-border services, competition and investment in Europe. This will level the playing field for telecoms operators in Europe, enhance legal certainty, and broaden consumer choice."

Daniel Pataki, chairman of the European Regulators Group, commented: "We welcome the result of the European Parliament's plenary vote. The Parliament has taken a very balanced approach on difficult questions such as the future institutional framework. The members of the European Parliament seem to have come to the same conclusions as the ERG."

BEUC, the European consumers organisation, commented: "Today MEPs voted to reinforce consumer rights and competition in telecoms markets across Europe. We hope the Council will follow the same line towards improving and facilitating consumers' daily lives. Many consumers still suffer from problems with their telecom providers: from complicated information to very long-term contracts, not to mention difficulties in switching. Concretely, thanks to today's move, consumers could benefit from more transparent information about tariffs and conditions of contracts."

Regarding spectrum, the European Brodcasters Union (EBUcommented: "Today's vote of the European Parliament confirms the importance of efficient radio spectrum management for future-oriented national and European media and audiovisual policies. MEPs managed to find a balance between a coordinated EU policy and the respect of general interest objectives, such as cultural diversity and media pluralism."

On the same lines, Ross Biggam, director-general of the ACT, the Association of Commercial Television in Europe, which is a direct competitor of the EBU, said: "The European Parliament has recognised the important role of member states when it comes to regulating the telecommunications market in the future. This relates particularly to the allocation and management of spectrum. Given the heterogeneity of European media markets, we believe that these should remain national."

The European Satellite Operators Association (ESOA) commented: "The Commission’s original proposal included a review of existing spectrum rights every five years. That has been changed with the Parliament proposing to delete any revolving reassessment but keeping a mandatory review by the end of 2010. The viability of a satellite operator’s business plan depends on a 15 to 20 year business cycle. It therefore relies on certainty over this time and any uncertainty with respect to rights of use of spectrum or access to specific bands could be a deterrent to investment in research and development of new services and applications in this strategic sector".

ETNO, the main association of telecoms operators, instead reacted: "ETNO regrets that the EP has not fully embraced the potential of the digital dividend in order to bridge the digital divide by boosting the development of mobile and wireless services."

ECTA, which represents the alternative telecom operators, focused its reaction on next-generation networks: "There are few surprises in the Parliament vote. We see a very strong positive signal that the Parliament want to see open access to fibre networks and support the principle of functional separation of dominant firms. However, we fear that they have added to the Commission's proposals a toxic mix of conditions that will undermine national regulatory authorities' ability to open networks and lead to less competition in Europe's telecom markets."

Cable Europe reacted: "Whereas the proposals of the European Parliament are, overall, supportive of infrastructure based competition, cable is disappointed by today's vote in first reading on a measure that mandates all network owners to give third parties access to their ducts."

On internet security, BSA, representing the software industry, commented: "Some of the amendments adopted today by the Parliament constitute a step forward in providing the much needed legal certainty that will support the deployment of robust and privacy-friendly security products," said Francisco Mingorance, BSA's senior director for public policy.

On 13 November 2007, the European Commission proposed a general review of the rules governing electronic communications. 

The package contains four legislative proposals, providing for the establishment of a new EU telecoms authority (EECMA, the European Electronic Communication Market Authority), the introduction of functional separation to spur competition, a review of radio-spectrum management and a range of consumer protection measures (see our LinksDossier).

  • National governments now have to decide if they will push through comprehensive reform. The next Telecoms Council is scheduled for the end of November. There is strong support for the adoption of the package before the end of the current Parliament in mid-2009, but many issues remain open to debate.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe