The UK-led EU delegation at a high-level meeting on internet governance has angered the US with a proposal to hand administration of the internet over to the United Nations.
The way that the internet is governed has been challenged by many countries, with the EU and emerging economies such as Brazil, China and India at the helm. The Brazilian delegation at the Geneva meeting commented: “On Internet governance, three words tend to come to mind: lack of legitimacy. In our digital world, only one nation decides for all of us.”
The United Nations Working Group on Internet Governance (
WGIG
) has released a report calling for an end to the US’s “pre-eminent role” in the management of the internet and said that there is a need for global institutions to be set up to tackle spam and network security issues: “No single government should have a pre-eminent role in relation to international internet governance.”
In its 2 June 2005 Communication on the second phase of WSIS, the Commission stated:
“The EU believes that a new cooperation model is needed in order to give substance to the provisions in the WSIS Declaration of Principles regarding the crucial role of all stakeholders within Internet governance, including governments, the private sector, civil society and international organisations. Existing Internet governance mechanisms should be founded on a more solid democratic, transparent and multilateral basis, with a stronger emphasis on the public policy interest of all governments. This new model should be based on the following principles:
- It should not replace existing mechanisms or institutions, but should build on the existing structures of Internet governance, with special emphasis on the complementarity between all the stakeholders involved in this process: governments, the private sector, civil society and international organisations;
- The new public-private cooperation model should contribute to the sustainable stability and robustness of the Internet by addressing appropriately public policy issues related to key aspects of Internet governance. ”
This statement was repeated in the EU’s 1 August 2005 initial comments on the WGIG Report. It also appears in the 28 September 2005 EU/UK proposal for additions to a paper of the Chair of the Sub-Committee on Internet Governance. What makes the United States furious in this proposal is the introduction of a “new cooperation model”, which
“should include the development and application of globally applicable public policy principles and provide an international government involvement at the level of principles over the following naming, numbering and addressing-related matters:
a. Provision for a global allocation system of IP number blocks, which is equitable and efficient;
b. Procedures for changing the root zone file, specifically for the insertion of new top level domains in the root system and changes of ccTLD managers;
c. Establishment of contingency plans to ensure the continuity of crucial DNS functions;
d. Establishment of an arbitration and dispute resolution mechanism based on international law in case of disputes;
e. Rules applicable to DNS system.”