Membership in eurozone unlikely for Denmark, Sweden-adviser

Minister for Nordic Cooperation of Iceland Kristjan Thor Juliusson, Prime Minister of Norway Erna Solberg, Prime Minister of Finland Juha Sipila, Prime Minister of Sweden Stefan Lofven and Prime Minister of Denmark Lars Lokke Rasmussen attend a press conference after morning discussions of the 69th Session of the Nordic Council in Helsinki, Finland, 01 November 2017. [EPA-EFE/KIMMO BRANDT]

The cooperation forum of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden is “in search of new relevance“, Christian Opitz and Tobias Etzold explained in a recent analysis paper by the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). EURACTIV Germany spoke with Tobias Etzold.

Tobias Etzold is a member of the research group Europe and EU of the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). The Foundation advises the German Bundestag and the German federal government on foreign and security policy issues.

The Nordic Council of Ministers has been engaged in a major reform process since 2014. What is it about? How is the state of play?

In 2014, a point was reached for making cooperation more efficient and more flexible. The financial crisis and the crisis of European integration prompted the Nordic countries to strengthen their links with each other. With this, it was first and foremost about administrative changes. For example, key issues have been defined and the role of the Secretary-General has been strengthened.

On the other hand, since 2016, the main concern has been to react to changes in the political environment: First, the refugee crisis, which has led to considerable tensions among the Nordic countries themselves, because, for example, suddenly once again internal border controls were installed. The cooperation was then further expanded in the field of refugee integration. The second major political issue is the Ukraine crisis and the changed relationship with Russia. The Nordic Council of Ministers had offices in Russia that had to be closed and it also had to re-adjust cooperation, especially with Northwest Russia.

And third, the Brexit. With the UK’s departure, a politically and economically important partner who is extremely important for the North leaves the EU. The Nordic countries are responding to this by looking for new partners on the one hand, and by working closer together in order to act more jointly at the international level.

Could the close economic ties with the UK after Brexit lead to serious withdrawal considerations in countries like Denmark?

In the Brexit negotiations, the Nordic countries will work to keep the UK as close as possible to the EU, so that even after the counties exit, they can continue to have close economic and political ties …

… therefore no Brexit imitators in Scandinavia in sight?

This was rather an issue before the Brexit referendum, especially in Denmark and Finland. There, right-wing populist parties had repeatedly brought the issue of an EU referendum into debates. After the Brexit vote, however, there were surveys showing that large majorities do not want to exit and do not want a referendum. It is not a big topic right now.

Whether the topic will come back on the agenda, however, also depends on the outcome of the negotiations between the EU and the UK. If London reaches an agreement that strengthens its political autonomy, but economic relations with the EU remain close, this could, especially in Denmark, raise the question as to whether this would not be an interesting path to go too.

The Commission wants to go in the other direction. All EU members are meant to join the monetary union, as much as it is possible. Denmark is out as there is a special arrangement. What about Sweden?

Membership in the eurozone would be one integration step too far for both Denmark and Sweden. They would lose much more independence than they are prepared to give up. Of course, Sweden is a special case. On the one hand, there is the commitment they have made to join, on the other hand, in 2003 there was a referendum in which accession was rejected by a clear majority. This scepticism has grown in the context of the economic and financial crisis.

Of course, there are also voices in the political and economic elites that promise themselves to benefit from joining the monetary union. Especially, since Sweden, unlike Denmark, is not connected to the euro via the Exchange Rate Mechanism II, which means that it is actually further away. Politically, accession is hardly enforceable. Since 2003, no government has touched the subject again. The Swedes are more allergic to the initiative of the Commission.