Campaigners hail ‘significant’ UK move on tax havens

Britain’s historic decision to compel its overseas territories to identify the owners of registered companies marks a “significant” moment in the global crackdown on dirty money, campaigners said Wednesday (2 May).

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Theresa May’s Conservative minority government acknowledged it would not be able to block an amendment in the House of Commons backed by many of its own MPs.

Territories like the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands and the Turks and Caicos Islands will have until December 31, 2020 to create public registers of so-called beneficial ownership or face direct intervention by London.

May, who had favoured a more consensual approach, changed her stance following MPs’ demands to improve transparency.

“The UK parliament… has taken a significant step toward global tax transparency by imposing public registers of beneficial ownership of companies on the UK’s overseas territories,” said the Tax Justice Network (TJN) campaign group.

“Until now, UK governments and parliamentarians have been unwilling to impose greater transparency.

“Despite the UK being legally responsible and able to do so, no action has been taken.

“But cross-party and opposition support in the UK parliament means that… an amendment was passed as part of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill, requiring the OTs to create public registers of beneficial ownership of companies — meeting the emerging international standard.”

EU denounces 'shocking' Paradise Papers revelations

The European Union on Monday (6 November) denounced the “shocking” revelations on the way top companies and dignitaries, including Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, avoid taxes using offshore wealth hubs.

Opposition Labour MP Margaret Hodge had tabled the amendment to the sanctions and anti-money laundering bill.

The development “is good news for the protection of human rights and democracy across the globe, and bad news for tax dodgers, money launderers and kleptocrats”, added Markus Meinzer of the TJN.

“The risks for dirty business ending up in bright daylight is increasing. Let’s now move on to tackle the next strongholds of financial secrecy — there are enough left for a lifetime.”

Anti-corruption campaign group Global Witness also applauded the news.

“By agreeing to push the UK’s overseas territories to publish public registers of the real owners of their companies, the UK has led the world in one of the biggest moves we have seen in the fight against corruption for years,” it said.

“So many of our investigations over the years have revealed (that) corrupt officials… mobsters and oligarchs use companies registered in these territories… to hide their criminal activities,” noted Global Witness.

EU blacklist

In December 2017, the European Union adopted a blacklist of 17 non-EU tax havens after a year of tough negotiations but subsequently removed nearly half.

EU adopts list of 17 tax havens, Panama first to protest

The EU finance ministers adopted yesterday (5 December) a list of “non-cooperative tax jurisdictions”, which is another way to label tax havens.

Last year’s Paradise Papers leaks gave new impetus to a global crackdown, making public some of the intricate ways the world’s rich evade tax using offshore havens.

“The anonymous companies for sale in these jurisdictions allow the corrupt and the criminal to steal, hide and move suspect funds around the world,” said Global Witness.

“And over a year ago, the Panama Papers demonstrated their importance, as they revealed that more than half of the companies named in the papers were registered in the UK’s overseas territories.”

Transparency International, another campaign organisation, has described Britain’s vote as a “hugely significant moment in the fight against corruption”.

Uproar over removal of Panama and seven others from EU tax haven blacklist

European Union finance ministers agreed on Tuesday (23 January) to remove eight jurisdictions, including much-criticised Panama, from the bloc’s blacklist of tax havens, one month after the list was set up. The decision prompted an outcry from lawmakers and activists.

Subscribe to our newsletters