‘Secret’ tax deals with multinationals soar despite scandals

A customer carries her ordered drinks in a Starbucks cafe. Phnom Penh, May last year. [Kith Serey/EPA]

Despite the uproar that followed the publication of ‘sweetheart’ deals between member states and corporations, the number of ‘secret’ unilateral tax agreements the countries signed with companies in 2016 actually rose 64% over the previous year to reach 2,053.

The advanced pricing agreements (APAs) are deals reached between multinationals and tax authorities to validate transfer pricing within the different divisions of the firm.

The APAs and tax rulings are secret deals reached between national authorities and companies. Although not all of them are illegal, national governments used them in some cases to offer extremely beneficiary conditions to multinationals to attract them to their territory.

The European Commission published late on Wednesday (14 March) the latest information available in the context of a EU joint transfer pricing forum.

The data from 2016 was provided by the capitals for the forum, a body which assists the Commission to find “non-legislative” solutions to practical problems posed by transfer pricing.

Commission officials argued that these agreements offer clarity and certainty to national authorities to know what revenues to expect from multinationals.

However, some of these agreements came under fire over the past years as they were used by giants like Starbucks or Fiat to substantially cut their tax bills.

Juncker accused of blocking EU efforts against tax avoidance

Jean-Claude Juncker deliberately blocked the EU’s efforts to fight tax avoidance while in office as prime minister of Luxembourg, according to documents revealed by British daily The Guardian and the International Consortium of Journalists. EURACTIV France reports.

In some cases, companies paid less than one 1% of taxes thanks to the tax gifts given by Luxembourg, as was revealed by a consortium of investigative journalists in 2014.

The Luxleaks scandal was followed by a series of revelations that put the fight against tax dodging on top of the EU’s agenda. The Commission has put forward several initiatives and opened investigations into some multinationals, including Apple, Starbucks, Amazon, McDonald’s or FIAT

The Commission forced Apple to pay back €13 billion in taxes after it found out that it was paying only 0,005% in taxes to Ireland.

Commission launches investigation into IKEA’s tax rulings

The European Commission announced on Monday (18 December) that it is investigating Ikea’s tax bills as it suspects that the Swedish furniture maker may have benefited from illegal aid offered by the Netherlands, worth around €1 billion according to some reports.

Belgium on top

Luxembourg, seen as the friendliest jurisdiction in Europe for tax dodging, did not come out on top of the lists of APAs in 2016. Instead, Belgium took the top spot with 1,081 agreements valid that year, compared to 599 in the Grand Duchy.

Belgian authorities told the forum that the large number was due to the combination of APAs and tax rulings.

In order to address the abuses, the Commission put forward rules to increase transparency by automatically exchanging information on tax rulings between member states. It also forced multinationals to disclose their benefits and other data on a country-by-country basis.

MEPs pass new rules to tackle multinationals' tax avoidance

The European Parliament on Tuesday (4 July) voted to oblige multinationals to publish details of their activities on a country-by-country basis, even outside the EU. The measure is designed to help the poorest countries fight tax evasion. EURACTIV France reports.

The first exchange is still ongoing, after the rules took effect last year.

In addition, the Commission warned this month Belgium, Luxembourg, Malta, Cyprus, Hungary, Ireland and the Netherlands for their aggressive tax-planning schemes.

According to the EU executive, between €50 to €70 billion is lost in tax revenues every year because of tax erosion.

Moscovici described these countries as “black holes” in the European tax framework.

Not concerned

However, the Commission was not particularly concerned about the significant increase of APAs disclosed in the forum.

“The Commission follows with interest the issuance of tax rulings and has not hesitated to act when it sees that a specific arrangement has given cause for concern,” said Commission spokeswoman Vanessa Mock.

She pointed out that tax rulings and APAs “are not per see illegal” and could be “useful” both for companies and countries.

“For businesses, it clarifies what they should be paying their tax on, and for EU countries it allows them to foresee their expected revenue intake,” she said.

But NGOs found the information worrying.

”These figures are shocking. It seems that no amount of high profile tax scandals will deter some governments from making secret tax deals with multinational corporations,” said Tove Maria Ryding, tax justice coordinator at the European Network on Debt and Development (Eurodad).

Ryding believes that the rising number of APAs complicates Commission’s oversight. And although the executive has access to the automatic exchange of information among the national governments, she said the Commission has “very limited knowledge about the actual content”.

Transfer pricing would come to an end once the proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base is adopted.

Brussels aims to harmonise corporate tax by 2021

The European Commission has unveiled its latest action plan to harmonise corporate tax. After two past failures, the executive hopes the recent flurry of tax scandals will give the project a new lease of life. EURACTIV France reports.

In 2016, the Commission relaunched the initiative, which should bring a new system for taxing multinationals. The institution argues that the new model would be more business-friendly while also eliminating the main channels of profit-shifting.

The European Parliament backed on Thursday the CCCTB. However, the proposal is stuck at the Council’s table.

“Yet for all the tough talk by members of the European Council on tackling tax dodging, they have been blocking this essential reform. Not only is this hypocritical, it robs them of much-needed resources to invest in their people,” said Green MEP Eva Joly.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe