Claude Turmes: ‘We won the Energy Transition Fund’

“We won the fund. Now it is time to do what I would call a ‘positive massage’," said Claude Turmes, a former Green MEP who left the European Parliament in June last year to become Luxembourg’s state secretary for the environment. [EPA-EFE/JULIEN WARNAND]

The Energy Transition Fund called for by the European Parliament is more than just a pot of money to support coal-dependent regions, says Claude Turmes, Luxembourg’s minister for energy and spatial planning.

On 5 November last year, the European Parliament’s budget committee signed off on a proposal that allocates €4.8 billion to an Energy Transition Fund (ETF) aimed at supporting coal-dependent regions green their economies.

Negotiations are still ongoing on the EU’s long-term budget for 2021-2027 but MEPs have already called on the European Commission to propose a new regulation that will establish the fund.

“We won the fund. Now it is time to do what I would call a ‘positive massage’,” said Claude Turmes, a former Green MEP who left the European Parliament in June last year to become Luxembourg’s energy minister, also in charge of spatial planning.

“The European Commission has already started exchanging with coal regions,” he told EURACTIV on the sidelines of the ‘Berlin Energy Transition Dialogue’. “And this is very, very positive because it is not just about money, it’s about setting a dynamic in motion and preventing regions from falling into depression.”

Asked about how the fund will be financed, the Luxembourg minister said it will be a mix between dedicated funds and existing money coming from structural funds aimed at supporting poorer EU regions.

EU's 'just transition fund' gesture muddies budget waters

Europe’s fossil fuel-dependent regions could benefit from an additional €5 billion under the next EU budget, thanks to a proposal endorsed by the European Parliament. But it could complicate already complex talks with the Council, which is eager to cut future spending.

Local actors decisive

The gradual withdrawal from coal means the regions are losing their identity, while at the same time having to adapt to a new economic reality, Claude Turmes continued.

“It is like mourning,” he said, adding it requires a considerable collective effort from the regions to engage in this transition.

“As end looms for coal, it is important for the regions to exchange with those that have already undergone their transition, like the Ruhr region or Wales,” he pointed out.

In this respect, he says the European Commission has understood the necessity to keep a network between coal-dependent regions alive, when it launched the coal regions in transition platform in December 2017.

Turmes cited the Silesia region in Poland as one being already active in implementing its transition.

“In Silesia, the cities are at the forefront of the coal phase-out movement. Local politicians are facing strong pressure from their electorate because of air pollution which has become one of the top political issue,” he remarked.

With an unemployment rate under 4%, he said Silesia is in the phase of economic expansion. “But skilled, qualified young people do not want to move to this region because of the air pollution,” he said, adding that it is one of the reason why local politicians want to phase out coal faster than their national counterparts.

“Silesia is seizing the opportunity of a historic moment. The fund would then allow the region to actually accelerate the process,” the former MEP added.

Clean energy transition ‘is a social policy issue’, Poles insist

The social policy dimension was largely overlooked when the European Union decided energy and climate change objectives for 2030, Poles have warned, calling on policymakers to endorse a “just transition fund” to support the country’s coal phase-out.

Political landmine in Germany

Claude Turmes carried on citing Germany’s so-called coal commission as an example of a successful social dialogue

“What Germany is doing is pushing for more infrastructure in the coal regions as well as decentralising state employment. And very importantly, it is financing civil society in the Länder that once used to belong to the GDR,” he said.

“The coal commission is really a model and I hope the German government will implement its recommendations,” he added.

Faced with stagnating greenhouse gas emissions despite a rapid expansion of renewable power, Merkel’s grand coalition set up an expert coal exit commission to devise a plan. The task force recommended shutting the last coal-fired power plant by 2038. It is now up to the government to translate the commission’s work into legislative drafts before parliament gets the final say.

This process, however, is turning into a political minefield. The migrant crisis that propelled the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (afD) into national parliament two years ago is now fading from public discourse. The AfD has now turned to the coal issue, propagating fears of economic collapse in the region which has more than 16,000 jobs dependent on coal.

The AfD is Germany’s only major party to oppose the renewable energy transition and is expected to significantly increase its share of the vote in the states of Brandenburg and Saxony.

What’s in the German coal commission’s final report?

With negotiations having lasted eight months and the outcome already postponed once, the German Commission on Growth, Structural Change and Employment (the so-called “coal commission”), has presented its final report. What’s in it? EURACTIV Germany reports.

[Edited by Frédéric Simon]

Subscribe to our newsletters