‘Merkel deceived us on climate’, says Germany’s Energiewende godfather

Frank A. Delle (Eased), Pierre Baigorry (Peter Fox), Demba Nabe during a concert of the band "Seeed" at a demonstration for a change in energy policies in Germany in Berlin in May 2014. [360b (Shutterstock)]

Berlin lacks the political will to bring the energy transition forward, said Hans Josef Fell, the initiator of Germany’s world-renowned 2000 renewable energy feed-in tariff legislation, in an interview with EURACTIV.com.

Chancellor Angela Merkel is meeting Tuesday (15 January) with the premiers of Germany’s four lignite mining states as well as the heads of the country’s so-called coal exit commission.

But the shortcomings of Germany’s energy transition are now plain to see, Fell told EURACTIV.

“The so-called coal commission is counter-productive since it delays reduction of private coal assets,” Fell said in an interview. 

“Climate protection means reducing greenhouse gas emission to zero, implying an immediate halt of fossil fuels. Only this could be termed climate protection, which would, however, require a political willingness to do so,” he added.

The Commission for Growth, Structural Change and Employment – dubbed the coal commission – was established by the German government on 6 June 2018 in a bid to accelerate the country’s emissions reductions and define a roadmap for a socially fair coal phase-out.

The commission was initially supposed to publish its conclusions by the end of 2018. But its last meeting was postponed to 1 February, primarily due to disagreements over how transition funds should be distributed among coal mining states.

Germany heads to COP24 without coal-exit plan

Germany is likely to show up empty-handed to the COP24 summit in Poland in December as the country’s coal exit commission has decided to extend its work beyond the original end-of-2018 deadline. EURACTIV’s media partner, Clean Energy Wire, reports.

German weekly Der Spiegel reported on 5 January that Chancellor Merkel has been dissatisfied with the commission’s work and wants to personally weigh in on its final conclusions.

But this should not hide the fact that Germany did too little in the past to bring the energy transition forward, argues Hans Josef Fell.

“Berlin took the easy way out by delegating a highly sensitive issue to others,” he argued.

Fell also underlined what he sees as an imbalance between the government’s handling of the renewable sector and the favourable treatment received by the fossil fuel industry.

“Where was the state when some 80,000 jobs were lost in the solar industry over the last years? There was no protective hand from the state for these workers, no solar commission was set up for them,” he said.

In reality, the coal industry is leading the government’s agenda on energy and climate issues, he argued.

“One just has to look at who is financing Germany’s main parties – the SPD (social-democrats), the CDU (Conservatives) and FDP (Liberals),” Fell said. “There is no real honest debate about energy, it is only about coal and other fossil industries,” he added.

Negative legislative development 

The energy transition, known as ‘Energiewende’ in Germany, is the country’s planned transition to a low-carbon, nuclear-free economy. It grew from a grassroots environmental movement into a vast national project.

At the heart of the Energiewende is the law Hans Josef Fell designed in 2000 – the Renewable Energy Act, which granted grid priority and guaranteed feed-in tariffs for renewable energies.

In 2000, the SPD-Green government and utilities also agreed to a nuclear phase-out, leading to a boom of wind and solar power in Germany up until 2012, Fell explained.

“Up to 2012, Germany did very, very good in terms of expanding the renewables industry and bringing the energy transition forward,” Fell said.

“But then, the federal government started to introduce a series of legislation that were detrimental to the energy transition,” he continued, describing these measures as legal “attacks” against the EEG and the Energiewende. 

Those attacks took the form of steep cuts to the guaranteed tariffs for solar energy. “You can do that when an industry is strong enough but not when it starts,” he said.

Then, around 2012, the introduction of the auction mechanisms for renewables followed. “This happened in response to the pressure of the European Commission, but Berlin channelled this pressure to modify the EEG,” Fell explained.

The true picture of the German Energiewende

Despite broad public acceptance, investments in renewable energy sources in Germany and the EU have been dramatically decreasing. The failing legislation and exclusion of citizen investments in renewables are jeopardising the Energiewende, writes Hans-Josef Fell.

According to Fell, the situation in Germany at that time was similar to countries like Spain or Italy. German renewable energy firms had no or little opportunity to export and thus compensate the losses they faced in Germany. 

In addition, little was achieved in other sectors relevant to climate change policy, meaning that the transformation has focused on the electricity sector only. 

“There is no transition happening in the automotive and building sectors,” Fell said, adding that the German stagnation is in sharp contrast with what is happening elsewhere across the world.

“Take, for example a country like Costa Rica, which achieved already about 100% of renewable electricity since 2015 or the strong growth of China’s and India’s renewables sector,” he remarked.

Discrepancy

Hans Josef Fell also highlighted a discrepancy between Germany’s green and climate-friendly image abroad and the country’s actual situation.

“Angela Merkel might present herself as a climate protector abroad, but at home, she is not taking the lead, she is deceiving us,” he said.

He also underlined the discrepancy between citizens support for the energy transition in Germany and the government’s foot-dragging on the phase-out of coal.

Germany pours cold water on EU’s clean energy ambitions

Voters across Europe have lost faith in politics partly because of “unachievable targets” on renewable energy, said German Energy Minister Peter Altmaier, who rejected calls from a group of other EU countries to boost the share of renewables to 33-35% of the bloc’s energy mix by 2030.

“Opinion polls show the majority of the population in Germany not only supports the energy transition, but is scared about climate change. Germans already feel the impact of rising temperatures on their lives. 2018 was the hottest year in Germany on record,” he said. 

But there are also some positive signs, Fell said.

“Bavaria announced it will integrate climate protection in its constitution. Things are also moving in Hessen and Thuringia, but then of course, the leeway is smaller than for the federal government,” he said.

Supporter

LUKOIL

LUKOIL is one of the largest publicly traded, vertically integrated energy companies in the World. The corporate mission of LUKOIL is to make the energy of natural resources serve the interests of mankind. Every day millions of consumers worldwide buy LUKOIL products, energy and heat, improving the quality of their life.

LUKOIL’s main activities are exploration and production of oil and gas, refining and marketing of petroleum products and petrochemicals, as well as power generation. In order to reduce environmental impact and make efficient use of resources, LUKOIL has developed renewable energy solutions including hydroelectric, solar and wind generation.

LUKOIL conducts its business in a responsible and sustainable way, seeking to strike a balance between socio-economic and environmental development by supporting communities, contributing to the economy and preserving the environment. The company stringently abides by the highest global environmental standards and shares the principles of the United Nations Global Compact ensuring high levels of occupational safety and health. Taking social responsibility for the efficient use of natural resources in all its earnestness and maintaining favorable environmental conditions in its business, LUKOIL is guided by the highest HSE standards. In its operations LUKOIL pursues the sustainable development principles and seeks to achieve a good balance between socio-economic and environmental development.

LUKOIL corporate governance system is based on international best practices and fully incorporates the principles of openness, regulatory requirements, fair competition, and transparency.

LUKOIL ordinary shares are admitted to the Moscow Exchange. LUKOIL depositary receipts are listed on the London and Frankfurt Stock Exchanges, as well as on the US OTC market.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe

Want to know what's going on in the EU Capitals daily? Subscribe now to our new 9am newsletter.