Est. 7min 29-10-2002 (updated: 29-01-2010 ) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram EU Enlargement: The Flood That Won’t Happen EU governments are still sounding alarms about the prospects of a tide of work-hungry Easterners invading their labor markets once the current candidate countries join the EU. It may be politically expedient, but it doesn’t have much basis in fact. Now that the Irish have given their nod to the Nice Treaty, Hungary and seven other Central and Eastern European states look certain to be invited to join the European Union in 2004. But while the waiting may be nearly over, there are plenty of politically explosive issues that will linger. One of them–the question of labor movement after EU enlargement–gained an extra charge in August, when a Reuters report said up to 800,000 Hungarians might look for work in Western Europe after the country joins the European Union. Predictably, the story was swiftly picked up on the wires and ran in media from Estonia to Ireland. Western European fears, already deeply entrenched, now had more evidence to feed off, it seemed. The figure, extrapolated from the findings of an opinion poll conducted by the Hungarian Social Research Center TARKI, is certainly dramatic. How many Hungarians would like to move to the West, it asked? Four percent answered “definitely,” 6 percent said “probably.” Add to that the awareness that Hungarian GDP per capita is around half the EU level based on purchasing power parity, and you have the makings of a good scare. These were figures large enough not just to touch but also to play on the always raw nerves of labor ministers in Austria, Germany, and other European countries. Western Europe has shown clearly that it is worried about migrant workers pouring into its labor markets. The chapter on labor mobility proved one of the prickliest in the applicants’ as-yet-unfinished accession talks with the EU. Ultimately, Hungary had to accept the “2-3-2 system” championed by Germany and Austria (and backed by plenty of others). For at least two years after Hungary’s accession (assumed to be in 2004), the EU’s current member states can impose the rules they choose. After that, their rules will continue to apply for another three years, depending on the findings of a European Commission report on migration and EU labor market indicators. In exceptional circumstances, another two years can be tacked on. In the meantime, the gap in wealth between Hungarians and Western Europeans will narrow (Hungary’s 3 to 5 percent annual rate of growth in recent years may not be dramatic, but it is still better than the EU’s), and governments can work on boosting employment at home and the employability of their own citizens. Western European fears have therefore meant that they have gone against one of the fundamental principles of the European Union: the free movement of labor. Politically, this may have been necessary in order to assuage the fears of Western voters. In practice, though, it was probably superfluous. LIES, DAMN LIES, AND STATISTICS First, consider TARKI’s findings. Perhaps its most notable finding was not the number of would-be Hungarian migrants, but rather that their number is shrinking. Since March 2001, the number of respondents who would “definitely” seek employment in the EU after Hungary’s accession has fallen from 7 to 4 percent, and those who would “probably” move edged down from 7 to 6 percent. And, of the 10 percent considering a move, only a quarter were interested in a long-term change. Translated into absolute numbers, that might still frighten many, but–as TARKI underlined–previous polls have tended to overestimate actual labor mobility. Second, regulation is just one of the barriers to be cleared before entering a foreign market. Another is language. In Hungary’s case this is a major obstacle. Hungarians may b e fonder of the EU than their Central European neighbors (in a survey by the GfK polling agency in May, 66 percent supported accession–and, unusually, the number is rising) and have greater confidence in the EU, but that doesn’t translate into fondness for its major languages. Just a quarter of Hungarians are able to communicate to some degree in one of the five major Western European languages: English, German, French, Italian, or Spanish. That figure, which comes from last October’s Eurobarometer survey, places them 11th out of the 13 candidate countries. Another is psychology. Certainly, ambitious or desperate Hungarians might soon shake the language handicap if wages stay low and opportunities remain limited. But even now, when employment abroad presumably looks financially more alluring than it will in the future, Germany’s quotas for Hungarian guest workers are frequently unfilled. (Indeed, between the mid- and late-1990s, more EU citizens moved onto Hungary’s labor market than went in the other direction, the Nuremburg-based Institute for Employment Research wrote in December 1999.) In short, Hungarians tend to stay at home rather than scout for opportunities abroad, an assertion backed by Hungarian studies. Saying one is definitely or probably interested in working abroad is, it seems, a long way from making good on the idea. And past experience provides a third reason for assuming projections of labor mobility will prove inaccurate. When, in the 1980s, the EU enlarged to take in the Mediterranean rim, Spain, Portugal, and Greece had a per capita GDP that was just 50 to 60 percent of the EU average. However, there was no significant increase in emigration. If anything, rapid growth meant that, in net terms, more Spaniards, Portuguese, and Greeks headed homeward. So a large inflow, let alone a flood, of Hungarian workers seems highly unlikely. One day, from Aachen to Zwelt, we may hear a collective sigh of relief that the supposedly inevitable has not happened. But we shouldn’t hold our breath. Faced with the problems of an aging population and labor shortages in fields as wide apart as health and computer science, Western Europeans should perhaps already be sighing with relief at the prospect of a few well-educated, highly motivated workers turning up from Central Europe, rather than worrying. Instead, flying in the face of the evidence, anxiety about Easterners stealing jobs from the locals is likely to persist, putting pressure on politicians. When (presumably in 2006) EU governments can lower foreign-labor requirements and grant full EU rights to Hungarians, it’s wisest to assume they won’t. To read more about the candidate countries, please visit Transitions Online.