Est. 6min 02-09-2003 (updated: 29-01-2010 ) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Expectations that the European Union jobs earmarked for the accession countries would attract a huge number of applicants haven’t exactly come to pass. Some candidate countries are blaming the EU for offering mainly entry-level positions. There have been roughly eight applications from citizens of EU candidate countries for each of the 5,000 available jobs offered by the EU institutions in the first wave of competitions to fill in the posts “reserved” for accession nationals. It is a considerable number–approximately 38,000–but still far less than expected. “Nobody was betting on fewer than 50,000 [applications], and many foresaw more than 100,000,” says Erik Halskov, the head of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), which organizes the competitions. Most of the applications came from Poland–by far the largest of the accession countries–followed by Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. But taking as an example the jobs available for A8 grade “administrators,” it seems that it is the Hungarians and Slovaks who are most keen to try their hand at EU employment. The A8 competition attracted 7,800 Poles, 5,300 Hungarians, 3,100 Czechs, and about 3,000 Slovaks, with the other accession countries sending 1,000 or fewer applications. Poland has 40 million inhabitants, Hungary and the Czech Republic 10 million each, and Slovakia about half of that–meaning that the Hungarians and Slovaks sent far more applications per capita than did their EU accession “classmates.” The EPSO has so far put only a few selected posts on the table. The majority are for junior administrators–the A8 grades–for which people with a university degree and solid language skills but without practical experience are eligible. Secretarial applications–the C grades–are also being processed. Requirements for C-grade positions include a proof of secondary education and knowledge of English, French, or German in addition to native language skills, although ability in another member-state language is a plus. For these jobs, 2,500 applications have come from Poland, 1,700 from Hungary, 1,000 from the Czech Republic, and 750 from Slovakia. Parallel to the competitions for administrators and secretaries, the EPSO is running an application process for translators and interpreters, both of whom will be needed in droves. There were 5,700 applications filed for these jobs. The next step for would-be Eurocrats is the first round of written exams–administered in English, French, or German–which include a general knowledge test, an EU knowledge test, and a test designed to measure logical reasoning and psychological aptitudes. At the same time, applicants will take an extensive written exam well beyond multiple-choice questions, writing extensive essays in their native language. The written exams will be taken into consideration only for those who pass the first three tests. The exact number of places for each nationality will be known in advance, and applicants who get over the first written hurdles will then be invited to Brussels for oral interviews. Naturally, the ability to use more than one, if not several, EU languages fluently is likely to have a maximum impact on who goes on from this stage. The names and characteristics of those who succeed will then be circulated in the so-called “blue book,” from which different institutions can pick their future employees according to their profile. It is at this stage–and only at this stage, stresses EPSO’s Halskov–that personal contacts could influence the final outcome for the applicants. According to Halskov, the first three phases of the competition are designed to be absolutely objective, with the initial tests assessed by computer. The bulk of the newcomers will be swallowed by the European Commission. However, many successful applicants are also likely to end up in the services of the European Parliament and in the Secretariat of the EU Council (Council of Ministers). Others will head for the European Court of Justice, the European Central Bank, the Eco nomic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, and other small bodies. Expectations for a high number of applications were fueled by fierce competition at the beginning of the year for 500 “fixed-term contract” positions, which attracted 25,000 applications. However, given the relatively low number of applications in this round, it seems that many of the people interested in EU civil service are not interested in what is on offer this time around. Some candidate countries are in fact quite upset about the concentration on A8-grade officials, who will more than likely be young people without experience who will start at the bottom of the hierarchy. They argue that those who spent the last decade preparing their respective countries for accession should be given a fair opportunity to become higher-grade experts in the institutions. But for the present, the EPSO foresees that only a few dozen middle-management posts will open for competition, probably this fall. The highest-ranking functions of directors-general, deputy directors-general, and the like–the so-called A1 and A2 grades–will be filled in on the basis of political agreements between the appropriate secretariats and the government concerned. That practice, critics charge, means “connections” may continue to play an important role in EU staffing decisions for the candidate countries. Meanwhile, one bonus for the EU is cost savings: Concentrating on recent university grads means much smaller salaries. The initial salary of an A8 official amounts to roughly 4,000 euros a month, while just a few steps higher on the ladder–A5 or A6 grades–means at least 50 percent more. But EU officials argue that they do not want to be held responsible for organizing a Brussels-bound brain drain from the new member states in a crucial period for public administration. The countries will badly need their rare civil servants with EU skills and experience to steer through the rough waters of the post-accession period. Visit Transitions Onlineto read more analyses about Eastern Europe.