Est. 5min 21-05-2002 (updated: 29-01-2010 ) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Overview of negotiations with Poland As Poland continues its membership negotiations with the European Union, right chapters remain open. Competition policy. This chapter remains open because of discussions over Poland’s so-called Special Economic Zones and the restructuring of the steel mill industry. As for the zones, the European Commission has stated that the state funds that go into supporting the zones does not fulfill EU standards. The EC expects Poland to present detailed info on what forms of state support are being used in the zones. Fisheries. In this chapter, Poland wants a five-year transition period that will bar ships that are powered by engines of 611 kW or stronger and that are longer than 30 meters from fishing in the Polish Economic Zone on the Baltic Sea. Poland wants sprat and herring fish to be subject to some kind of market intervention mechanism, so that prices will not be entirely determined by the market. Transportation. Poland is asking for transition periods for access to railway infrastructure, which it wants to allow after 1 January 2006, and for access to air transport, which it wants to allow after 1 January 2006 as well. Justice and Home Affairs. Questions remain with regard to how Poland will introduce visas for Russians, Belarusians, and Ukrainians. Apart from that, the EU would like to see improvements in the efficiency of the justice system, police, and the fight against organized crime and drug trafficking. The EU would also like Poland to modernize its border area infrastructure. Agriculture. The European Commission proposal to offer new member states only 25 percent of the direct payments in agriculture in their first year of membership, and gradually increasing sums in subsequent years. In addition, the EC’s proposals on production quotas are based Poland’s agricultural production between 1995 and 1999 when the country’s agricultural production was low. So far, the Polish government has stood firm in its opposition to the EC’s proposals, saying it wants the subsidies to reach 100 percent in 2006 and the production quotas to be set at higher levels. On 14 May, the Polish EU negotiating team met in Warsaw with representatives of farmers to discuss Poland’s answer to the EC proposals. The meeting’s results have were not released to the public. Poland has also yet to close the particularly difficult chapters on Regional policy and Financial and Budgetary Provisions. Planned or foreseen progress. Poland should be able to close the Transport, Justice and Home Affairs, and the Fisheries chapters at the 11-12 June negotiation round in Luxembourg. The discrepancies between the Polish and EU positions on those chapters are not so large and there should be no major problems in closing them. At the 21-22 June EU summit in Seville, Spain, the EU will make an initial assessment of whether Poland will be able to complete the negotiations in 2002. The summit will review the administrative and justice systems to ensure they are ready to implement EU legislation. Some time between July and October Poland is likely to attempt a compromise on competition policy chapter, but the disputes over the special economic zones and the steel industry are complex and there’s a danger that the chapter may not be closed. The 24-25 October EU summit in Brussels during which the EC will say definitely whether Poland is able to end negotiations in 2002. At the 12-13 December EU summit in Copenhagen, the final decision on how many countries will make it to the EU will be made. At the end of December, the most difficult chapters should be complete, Agriculture, Regional Policy (structural funds), and Budget. In terms of budgetary issues, Poland has asked to be able to phase in its contributions to the common EU budget over the span of five years. But that proposal has been rejected by the EU. A referendum on Poland’s entry into the EU should come in the fall of 2003. There is a legal controversy here: if the turnout is greater than 50 per cent, then the referendum results are valid, but experts cannot agree on what would happen if the turnout was lower than 50 per cent. In terms of significant derogations, Poland was able to score a significant victory in its negotiations of the chapter on the free movement of capital. Although the Polish government had originally asked for a transition period that would enable it to bar foreigners from purchasing agricultural land for 18 years after the country joins the EU, in the end the EU agreed to a 12-year ban. But this was still more than the seven-year transition periods that other candidate countries received in this area. The ban in Poland will be shortened to seven years for those foreigners from the EU who are currently leasing land in the western and northern part of the country (which is land that belonged to Germany before World War II), and three years for those leasing land in the remainder of the country. To read more about Central and Eastern Europe, please visit Transitions Online.