Est. 4min 04-11-2002 (updated: 05-04-2007 ) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Vision to go ahead with EU Ankara- Turkish Daily News The Turkish case with respect to the EU has reached a very strategic and promising stage at which some very significant accomplishments such as legal as well as nonlegal measures should be recognized as the milestone events leading into the more optimistic future for Turkey’s chances of accession to the EU. Turkish authorities should believe and convince the EU authorities that she possesses the will power, capacity, capability, responsibility and accountability to meet the challenges posed aptly or inaptly in the pursuit of her accession to the EU as an additional positive synergistic source (member). Indeed, she deserves to build up a positively appealing image by means of a hard work strategy implemented without any lethargy, easygoing and foot dragging posture at all on the remaining issues which are, in essence, relatively easier to handle compared with the significant progress, having been made on much more complicated situations. The road map ahead is shorter, easier and more optimistic to wait or go ahead than what has already been achieved. This fact is alone sufficient evidence for all parties to believe their physical, material, emotional will power dedicated to drive the accession endeavors to the happy end successfully. It is appropriate to see and face at this point by recalling essentially what really lies ahead with easygoing, open, candid and objective mind to motivate and strengthen ourselves even more. Major documents and guidelines to consider in this regard are the Maastricht criteria and Copenhagen political criteria as follows: a. Turkey must reduce her inflation to the mean inflation of three EU member countries with the least (best) inflation plus one-and-a-half points. b. Turkey’s public debt ought to fall below (under) 60 percent of Gross national product currently amounting to about $100 billion. c. Government budget deficit must be less than or equal to 3 percent of Gross national product, implying about $5 billion currently. d. Interest rate on public bonds with one year maturity is expected to be less than or equal to the mean rate of three EU member countries with the lowest interest rates plus 2 percent of that average. e. Turkish currency should maintain its stability for at least two years in a row. The preceding guidelines are imposed as a part of the Maastricht Agreement. Furthermore, the Copenhagen criteria comprise a: political criterion requiring that Turkey does have an operational domestic system secured by stable, functional, institutional structure, supremacy of law in order and human rights. b: Economic criterion implies that Turkey sustains a free market system operating sufficiently and that the market should have the ability, strength and capacity to compete relatively well within EU markets. c: Turkey must observe EU laws and monetary objectives. What is really and essentially required of Turkey is not unique to herself. They are all expected from every country seeking accession to the EU. As the part of further development, progress, advancement and civilization project with EU membership or without it, Turkey should seriously consider the meeting preceding criteria relentlessly with stamina and perseverance. Indeed, we can even be more encouraged and motivated by studying the following table demonstrating the difficulties, deviations and disturbances at meetings of these standards by the current member countries in 1997: In 1997, only one member country, Luxemburg, seemed able to meet all of these criteria. Even Germany, the leading-driving economic power, the strongest economy had difficulty and deviations from the standards. As a rule, the EU acts as an assessor of the country seeking activel y the accession to it in terms of condition, standards, timing, negotiation process, etc. Turkey seems to hold rational for realizing these results by focusing on convergence to EU in terms of solving all existing issues with the EU and its member countries reasonably well. All these problems are solvable and worth solving for the best interest of both parties equally. Thus, the parties should effectively deal with the critical issues for driving the accession of Turkey to the EU by mobilizing all the resources, all the skills, power, capability and capacity they have with the great vision. To read more about Turkey, please visit Abhaber.