European Parliament President Martin Schulz, who was the ‘spitzenkakndidat’ of the centre-left, congratulated Juncker and said:

"The new European Commission starts under the right auspices. Its President benefits from the strongest possible legitimacy. Today his team has received backing from a very large majority of the Parliament, and his own nomination is the direct result of the outcome of the European Parliament election.”

“We need to quickly transform the Union from one that is involved in piecemeal crisis management into one leading a coordinated policy approach leading to stability, growth and unity for its citizens and Member States. In the last elections we had the courage to dare more democracy at European level. Now it is time to dare more politics," Schulz concluded.

The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) Group abstained in today's vote on the new European Commission. The ECR Chairman Syed Kamall said while his political group agrees on the new structure and on a number of political priorities like cutting red tape and completing the single digital market, they disagree on the appointment of a few Commissioners. In particular, ECR was disappointed by not appointing a budgetary control Commissioner, or that “a French Socialist with a poor record on growth and stability pact” got an economic portfolio.

"Where you pursue reform we will work with you. There is much work to do and we wish you well", Kamall concluded.

The liberal ALDE group first Vice President Sophie in 't Veld told Juncker: "You have our vote today, but it is not a blank cheque for the next five years. We will support any proposal taking Europe forward, making it stronger, more democratic and better equipped to confront the huge challenges of today. ALDE expects fundamental reforms in the EU. We need a pro-European majority to move Europe forward. Within the majority, ALDE is the force for change, the Große Koalition stands for status quo and stagnation."

The Greens/EFA co-president Philippe Lamberts and his group voted against the Juncker Commission because they are not convinced the overall package and policy direction is enough to re-establish the trust of citizens in the nascent European democracy.

"The final College is clearly the result of a deal between the EPP, socialist and liberal groups in the EP. Rather than being chosen for competence, candidates have in many cases gotten portfolios based on party affiliation, with MEPs from the bigger groups accepting these problematic candidates as a quid pro quo. The male-heavy line-up and the unacceptably low representation of women in the College, is also a major source of regret."

Greens/EFA co-president Rebecca Harms added:

"This is not a blanket rejection: our group is supportive of many of the commissioners-designate and, as a pro-European political force, will work constructively with the new Commission where possible to try and ensure it delivers meaningful responses to the real challenges facing Europe and its citizens.

"While president Juncker could only choose from the pool of candidates provided by the member states, we believe his choice of portfolio allocation has placed candidates in charge of portfolios in which they will have clear conflicts of interest, like in the case of Mr Canete and Mr Hill, or for which they are unsuitable, like Mr Navracsics. There were finally too many problematic areas for our group to endorse the team proposed by president Juncker."

Reinhard Bütikofer, Co-Chair of the European Green Party, said:

“The hearings revealed that there are contrasting expectations about the seven existing and twenty new Commissioners. The largest gap in the Commission's operations is in the range of ecological responsibility and the transition to sustainability. Whether the Commission is able to fill this gap, and grow into a functioning team, will not only be crucial for Juncker himself, but also for the EU.”

Another Co-Chair of the European Green Party Monica Frassoni, said: 

“While the Greens firmly supported the democratic and innovative Spitzenkandidaten process, we have not given Mr Juncker a carte blanche; and the Green Group has not supported the vote on Juncker’s Commission this morning in the Strasburg plenary. We consider the overall composition and the allocation of key-portfolios by Mr Juncker to be more than questionable. In spite of the positive assessment given to many of the new commissioners, Greens across Europe have had misgivings, and for instance with Arias Cañete a specific concern.”

The President of the leftist GUE/NGL group Gabi Zimmer told Juncker before voting against the new Commission that her group does not believe the new team is apt for today’s challenges. She said:

"Too many members of the new Commission provoke downright doubt that they will work to turn things around by stopping devastating austerity measures and prioritising social and ecological needs so that citizens feel that the EU is doing something positive for them. No one even admitted that the austerity policy of recent years with the privatisation of public goods and services, the reduction of minimum wages and pensions, attacks on individual and collective human rights were damaging. No one called for an end to this policy which has destroyed the social fabric of member states."

Also commenting on the vote, GUE/NGL Vice-President Neoklis Sylikiotis said: "The EU must change direction with policies that create new jobs and ensure the welfare state. The solution against the crisis is found in policies that will boost the economy and social development, rather than on austerity policies. We cannot and will not stay idle if these policies continue. This is why we voted against the new Commissioners and the neoliberal policies which they express and represent."

UKIP group also voted against the Juncker team. The group’s leader Nigel Farage said in plenary: “I don’t think that the European public or commentators understand what the European Commission really is. The Commission is the executive, it is the Government of Europe and it has the sole right to propose legislation. It does so in consultation with 3,000 secret committees staffed mainly by big business and big capital and all the legislation is proposed in secret.”

“The means by which the European Commission makes law and holds law is actually the very enemy of the concept of democracy itself, because it means in any member state there is nothing the electorate can do to change a single piece of European law.”

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) today criticised the Parliament’s vote in a statement today. It says: "The new Commission includes an ex-petroleum company president as climate commissioner (Miguel Arias Cañete); an ex-corporate lobbyist in charge of financial services (Jonathan Hill); a former vice-president of the industry lobby group Le Cercle de l'Industrie in charge of economic policy (Pierre Moscovici); an ex-Goldman Sachs financier as research commissioner (Carlos Moedas); and the former political no.2 to a Czech multi-billionaire as consumer commissioner (Vera Jourova)."

Olivier Hoedeman of Corporate Europe Observatory says: “Today's vote to accept the Juncker Commission is a huge disappointment. Too many of the Juncker commissioners have backgrounds which make them unsuitable for their new portfolio and MEPs should have shown some political muscle by rejecting those about whom serious concerns were raised.”  [More]

Commenting on the outcome of the vote, Emma Marcegaglia, President of BUSINESSEUROPE, said:

“It’s a positive sign that President Juncker has formed his team without further delay.  His team received a strong vote of support from the European Parliament.  Now we urge Mr Juncker and his colleagues to start their work immediately, as time is of essence.  Not a minute more can be lost to strengthen our suffering economies.  BUSINESSEUROPE will therefore present a comprehensive 10-point plan with its expectations to the new European Commission next week”.

Angelo Caserta, Director of Birdlife Europe and Chair of the Green 10 stated in a press release: “In these trying times of ecological crisis, recession, and rising inequality, we need President Juncker’s Commission to prove it is up to the challenge. Europe requires environmentally, socially and economically sustainable policies and innovation that benefit people.”

“While we welcome that some small improvements have been made, notably on the inclusion of sustainability in the portfolio of the First Vice-President Frans Timmermans, the commitment to keep medicines and pharmaceutical products with the Commission’s directorate for health, and a more cautious approach to the Investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), the Green 10 remains gravely concerned that the Juncker Commission could see a serious downgrading of environmental policy.”

Uwe Combüchen of the Council of European Employers of the Metal, Engineering and Technology-Based Industries said in a statement:

“We welcome the structural changes proposed to the College of Commissioners, and hope that it improves the efficiency and streamlining of policies. When it comes to proposing new regulation, it is essential that this is built on evidence-based impact assessments and competitiveness checks and that there will be a cultural change towards co-ordination between the different Commissioners and the respective Directorates General for example. There are manifold challenges and opportunities lying ahead of us and the EU institutions and industry will need to work very closely together to succeed.” 

The Committee of the Regions (CoR) President, Michel Lebrun, has welcomed the new College of European Commissioners and its commitment expressed over the past few months to ensure a greater involvement of local and regional authorities in the European decision-making process.

Referring to President Juncker's political programme for the next five years, President Lebrun said, “The Committee of the Regions will take these priorities as guidelines for its upcoming term-of-office and will closely monitor its implementation, especially with regards to EU Structural Funds, youth employment and green growth, all areas where regions and cities must have their say. The EU must show it can deliver results and with potentially EUR 300 billion to be invested in cities and regions in the coming years, regional and cohesion policy will play a decisive role".

EuroCommerce is concerned that El?bieta Bie?kowska’s portfolio would now also include space policy, on top of an already very full area of responsibility. Christian Verschueren, Director-General of EuroCommerce, said, “We believe that bringing together industry and services makes sense, as is the combination with competitiveness, SME policy and the Single Market. But, as a result, it felt that the Internal Market and Industry portfolio presented a significant workload. We fear that the recent addition of space policy to an already busy portfolio may well stretch Ms Bie?kowska beyond her limits.”

Press articles

• EURACTIV France: La Commission Juncker confirmée par le Parlement après quelques ajustements
• EURACTIV Germany: Europas "letzte Chance": Startschuss für die Juncker-Kommission
• EURACTIV Spain: El equipo de Juncker recibe el visto bueno de la Eurocámara
• EURACTIV Italy: Commissione Juncker: arriva fiducia Pe
• EURACTIV Poland: Dzi? g?osowanie na sk?adem nowej Komisji Europejskiej
• EURACTIV Romani: Vot favorabil in Parlamentul European pentru Comisia Juncker: 423 pentru
• EURACTIV Slovakia: Europoslanci schválili Junckerovu Komisiu „poslednej šance”
• EURACTIV Czech Republic: Junckerova Komise potvrzena, ?R má první eurokomisa?ku
• Dnevnik, EURACTIV partner in Bulgaria: ?????????????? ???????? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ???????
• EURACTIV Turkey: Yeni Avrupa Komisyonu, AP'den onay ald?
• EURACTIV Greece: ??????? ???????????? ???? Juncker ?????? ??? ???????? ??????????