Some Europeans are deeply respectful of European institutions and serious about the jobs of the persons that lead it. It is a valuable project that brought peace, prosperity and democracy to the continent. It deserves full support. On the other hand, the Slovenian centre-left was cheering to the song that refrains “Europe is a gang of thieves” [see related EURACTIV article].
Somewhere in between these two understandings is the second nomination for the member of the European Commission from Slovenia.
Žiga Turk, professor, is former secretary general of the Future of Europe Reflection Group and former Minister of Education and Science of Slovenia. He first published this commentary on his EURACTIV blog.
Ms. Violeta Bulc has had a political job for a few weeks only. She has zero political experience. She has never been involved in policymaking. However, Slovenia is a country of political opportunity. For some. After a poor performance of a centre-left government of Ms. Bratušek, the voters this summer did not give a chance to the opposition but awarded Mr. Miro Cerar, another centre-left politician, with a landslide victory. The current prime minister was never leading anything bigger than a chair at a University. He set up his party a few weeks before the elections. He now leads the country. The uneven political playing field in Slovenia makes this possible.
Why, then, could not an absolute beginner lead a portfolio in the European Commission? The decision to nominate Ms. Bulc could be interpreted as an indicator of a shallow talent base of the Cerar’s party and a result of poor understanding of the seriousness of the European project. Which I believe is the case. However, it could also be interpreted as a sign of contempt and disrespect: as if being a Commissioner is a job that does not require any experience. As if just about anyone who did some public speaking could do it.
It is worth remembering that in August when his opinion did not matter much, Mr. Cerar said he was supporting Mr. Poto?nik [Janez Poto?nik, current Slovenian commissioner]; then Ms. Fajon [Tanja Fajon, current MEP from S&D] and Mr. Erjavec [Karl Erjavec, former foreign minister and leader of the Democratic Party of Pensioners in Slovenia]. Now that this opinion matters, he pushes his party loyal Ms. Bulc through the process. Though even in the government there were 7 votes against her, 6 in favor and 2 abstained. But technically there wasn’t a majority against her.
Mr. Cerar won the national elections on the ticket of morality and ethics. He is becoming a politician fast. Sadly Ms. Romana Jordan, two time MEP, PhD in nuclear physics and a respected member of ITRE [the European Parliament transport and energy committee] was never seriously considered in Slovenia though she could excel in an energy, industry or science related portfolio.
The sacred feminine
The second controversy that is accompanying Ms. Bulc’s nomination is her track record in the occult, in shamanism, in walking on fire, whispering to horses, annulling the second law of thermodynamics. The list of readings and links on her website is long and mind-boggling.
If she is appointed a European Commissioner she could inspire the next Dan Brown’s novel. On how the sacred feminine energy, symbolized by the Zeus’s mistress Europa is returning to the center stage of Europe. Yes, the novel would take place in Brussels, not in the Vatican, Florence and Istanbul. Perhaps there are some some underground corridors between Justus Lipsius and Barleymont for Prof. Langdon to navigate.
On a more serious note, I actually think Ms. Bulc’s appointment (a few weeks ago) into the Slovenian government – to a position similar to mine in 2007-2008 – was not a bad idea. At a non-portfolio post she could not do much damage but could bring some out of the box thinking to the government table. Which can be valuable.
The way I understand Ms. Bulc’s consulting it is about making businesses more creative and innovative. Without going too deep into the theory and psychology of creativity, being creative means finding a solution which as outside of the set of obvious solutions that a mind limited with rationality could come across. The mumbo-jumbo that she preaches could be a way to “overload” the rational brain and, with the shields of common sense and reason weakened, allow for “out of the box” ideas to emerge – in business, design, anywhere.
I do not know if she really believes in the unscientific quackery that she lectures about or is just selling that snake oil to (naïve) business customers to help them be more innovative and creative. If it is the second, Brussels could certainly use an occasional departure from the politically correct but often void phrases that dominate the bubble.
She will make it
The problem is the thin line between the irrational and the creative. If she can persuade Mr. Juncker and the MEPs that she can walk it, she will do just fine at the hearings. After all, it would be disrespectful and un-European to dismiss a second Slovenian in a row.
There might even be sympathy for her beliefs in the parliament. In the West the appreciation of shamanism, African cults, conversations with horses etc. is regarded open, tolerant and multicultural. She would be in much greater trouble had her blogs be about the visions of Archangel Gabriel instead of syntropy equations; and conversations with Virgin Mary instead of spirits of horses. Commissioners were dismissed for less. In the European Parliament it is more dangerous to be a strict catholic, such as Mr. Buttiglione [Rocco Buttiglione, the unsuccessful candidate for commissioner from Italy in 2004], than a shaman. It is worth noting that we are speaking about European and not African Union.
Personally I am sorry that Slovenia was unable to look beyond petty party interests in the nomination of its Commission candidates. Ms. Bulc is not the best choice but has broad horizons, is intelligent and will hopefully learn fast.
What Europe should learn from the saga with the Commission member from Slovenia (and a few others) is, that the Commission construction process is dysfunctional. The president of the Commission should simply have more to say on who he/she want on his team. Parliamentary rejection also should not be such an exception. After all, the success or failure of the Commission is not the responsibility of the member states. It is the responsibility of the president of the Commission and, to some extent, of the Parliament. Powers, actual and taken, should be compatible with that.