The Nine Lives of the Stability Pact

DISCLAIMER: All opinions in this column reflect the views of the author(s), not of EURACTIV.COM Ltd.

In a special report by CEPS, its Macroeconomic Policy Group (MPG) focuses on the problems encountered in implementing the excessive deficit procedure foreseen in the Maastricht Treaty along the lines of the Stability and Growth Pact. The Pact has effectively been suspended since EcoFin’s 25 November decision not to endorse the Commission’s recommendations vis a vis France and Germany.

The Nine Lives of the Stability PactThis special report by the CEPS Macroeconomic Policy Group (MPG) is concerned with the implementation of the prohibition of excessive deficits contained in the Treaty of Maastricht via the Stability and Growth Pact. Specifically, it deals with the controversy that was provoked by the failure of the ECOFIN Council of 25 November 2003, to endorse recommendations of the European Commission to put France and Germany on notice that they had violated the Treaty’s prohibition of excessive deficits. The CEPS MPG finds that the core of the dispute arises not so much from the Stability Pact, but from the 3% limit set in the Treaty. It asserts that this clause should not be altered, as argued by many observers, and that it is even more appropriate now, than when it was first agreed in 1991, because of the slowdown of potential growth in Europe.

The CEPS MPG is composed of distinguished economists who have undertaken to carry out independent, in-depth research on current developments in the European economy. The authors of the present report are: Chairman: Daniel Gros, CEPS; Thomas Mayer, Deutsche Bank, London; and Angel Ubide, Tudor Investments, Washington, D.C.

For more analyses from the Centre for European Policy Studies visit the

CEPS website.  

Subscribe to our newsletters

Subscribe

Want to know what's going on in the EU Capitals daily? Subscribe now to our new 9am newsletter.