Two-speed Europe highlights East-West divide

The consensus reached at Monday’s Versailles summit (6 March) on the need to construct a two-speed Europe risks reigniting tensions between the EU’s eastern and western member states. EURACTIV France reports.

After struggling to overcome their differences on the migration crisis, the EU’s eastern and western members are once again split over the question of a possible multi-speed Europe, a scenario that is gaining traction on the continent as the bloc looks to define its post-Brexit identity.

“Hard core” versus peripheral states

While the idea of building the EU’s future around a “hard core” and a group of less integrated peripheral states has seduced France, Germany and Italy, the EU’s more recent members are eying this development with suspicion.

“The Versailles summit does not look so good if you come from one of the small member states,” said Hungarian MEP György Schöpflin at a debate organised by the Club Grande Europe in Paris on Tuesday (7 March). For this member of Hungary’s governing Fidesz party, if these countries “continue to push for a hard core in the EU they will end up distancing the Central and Eastern European member states”.

Bulgarian MEP compares two-speed EU to apartheid

Bulgarian MEP Peter Kouroumbashev (S&D) has compared ideas for a two- or multi- speed EU, advocated by the European Commission, to apartheid, arguing that such projects would ultimately destroy the Union.

French President François Hollande called together the leaders of Germany, Italy and Spain in Versailles on Monday (6 March) to prepare for the EU summit in Brussels on 9-10 March.

Post-Brexit EU

But the major subject of the talks was the four countries’ visions for the future of the post-Brexit EU. Despite a certain reticence from Madrid, the eurozone’s ‘big four’ appeared more or less agreed on the need for differentiated integration.

“For a long time this idea of a differentiated Europe, with different speeds and different rates of integration, has provoked a lot of resistance. But today, it is a necessary idea. Otherwise, Europe will explode,” Hollande said in Versailles.

'Big four' call for new European dynamic, multi-speed EU

Ahead of the EU’s 60th anniversary Rome summit on 25 March, the heads of continental Europe’s biggest economies endorsed the vision of a multi-speed Europe, in which some members could deepen their integration faster than others. EURACTIV France reports.

The option of a multi-speed Europe is one of the five possible scenarios for the future of the EU, presented by Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker in his White Paper. Despite staunch resistance from some quarters, this option appears for the moment to be the most popular among the older member states.

“In general I think it is important for countries to have informal debates,” said Petr Drulak, the Czech Republic’s former foreign minister, referring to Monday’s four-way talks. “But any initiatives that come out of them must be open and other member states must be able to influence them,” he added.

Visegrad group

The Czech Republic is a member of the Visegrád group (which also includes Poland, Hungary and Slovakia). This informal group allows the four countries to develop and better defend joint positions within the EU.

Yet informal alliances of this kind should not be formalised, Drulak said, for fear of excluding the other member states. “We can begin in a tighter group, but then the debate has to be opened to everyone,” he said.

“I do not know whether Estonia will support a multi-speed Europe because we have always wanted a united Europe,” said Alar Streimann, Estonia’s ambassador in France. The Baltic country will take over the six-month rotating presidency of the EU in July this year and plans to make European unity its number one priority. “At 27 states there will always be snags. But from our perspective, the EU works.”


Measure co-financed by the European Union

The content of this page and articles represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The European Parliament does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

Subscribe to our newsletters