Rewriting the ground rules of European diplomacy: The EEAS in the making

DISCLAIMER: All opinions in this column reflect the views of the author(s), not of EURACTIV Media network.

Setting up the European External Action Service (EEAS) is proving more difficult than anticipated, but this is no surprise given that the details were left until the implementation phase and it requires re-writing the ground rules of European diplomacy, write Timo Behr, Johanna Nykänen and Aaretti Siitonen of the Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA) in a briefing paper.

 The following is a summary of the FIIA briefing paper.

  • The newly ratified Lisbon Treaty determined the rough shape of the European External Action Service (EEAS), but left the difficult task of negotiating all the remaining details to the implementation phase.
  • In the post-Lisbon debate on the EEAS, the Commission has attempted to ensure its control over EU foreign policy, while the European Parliament has demanded greater democratic oversight and defended the 'Community method' of decision-making. The Council has been torn between the imperative of creating a functioning service and the instinct to safeguard national prerogatives.
  • Much of this confrontation has been shaped by differences over the intergovernmental versus supranational character of the future service.
  • The outcome of this conflict is not only going to change the current institutional balance of power in Brussels, but also shape the nature and direction of European diplomacy in the future.
  • With the establishment of the EEAS, the EU's approach to international affairs is likely to become more ''political'' and ''intergovernmental''. At times, this will facilitate quicker and more decisive EU actions, but might also result in a loss of the EU's normative character as an international actor.
  • As previously, the EU's ability to appear as a unified actor in international affairs will depend on the Council's capacity to take common decisions. Here, whether the EEAS will be the catalyst of a more unified European foreign policy, rather than act as a bulwark of national interests, remains to be seen.

Subscribe to our newsletters