Est. 3min 04-09-2008 (updated: 28-05-2012 ) Yulia_Timoshenko.jpg Euractiv is part of the Trust Project >>> Languages: Français | DeutschPrint Email Facebook X LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Kiev’s pro-Western coalition collapsed on Thursday (3 September), just days ahead of a crucial EU-Ukraine summit. MEPs and diplomats in Brussels expressed their consternation over renewed in-fighting between President Viktor Yushchenko and his prime minister, Yulia Timoshenko, former ‘Orange Revolution’ allies. President Viktor Yushchenko blamed the crisis on his prime minister Yulia Timoshenko, whom he had recently accused of “high treason” for siding with Moscow during the Georgian crisis (EURACTIV 20/08/08). In the meantime Timoshenko reacted, saying that her position was in line with that of the EU and that she did not want to drag Ukraine into the conflict. At an emergency meeting Tuesday night, Yuschenko’s party, “Our Ukraine/People’s Self-defence,” voted to withdraw from the coalition with the Yulia Timoshenko Bloc, accusing it of attempting a constitutional coup after it voted, together with the pro-Moscow Party of the Regions, in favour of four key bills to transfer authority from the president to the cabinet of ministers. The next day (3 September), Yushchenko made a live television address to the nation in which he threatened to use his right to dissolve the parliament if a new ruling majority coalition was not formed within 30 days. Observers note, however, that Our Ukraine/People’s Self-Defence has not yet officially dissolved the current coalition. There are supporters of the current coalition in both Our Ukraine/People’s Self-Defence and the Yulia Timoshenko Bloc. Western disappointment MEPs and Western diplomats expressed bitterness over the ill-timed political in-fighting between the two leaders of the pro-Western coalition. EU leaders, and notably French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, had warned Ukraine against destabilisation following the Georgia crisis (EURACTIV 27/08/08). And, while the recent EU summit had indicated (EURACTIV 02/09/08) that Ukraine could capitalise from the crisis and obtain more generous treatment as a prospective EU member, instead, the internal crisis has already led to a downgrading of the language of the draft declaration, which is to be adopted at the 9 September EU-Ukraine summit in Evian. According to sources, no mention is made of future EU membership in the fresh draft. A Commission spokesperson was not even sure that the summit would take place, as the French Presidency could in principle cancel the meeting. Asked if the EU executive considers the latest developments to have been triggered by the Georgian crisis, the spokesperson said they are seen as a continuation of previous in-fighting. Speaking to EURACTIV, the chairman of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee Jacek-Sariucz Wolski called for “unity of the Orange coalition, not breakup”. He said the coalition was facing a problem of credibility over whether it was really capable of following its pro-European agenda. In spite of Yuschenko accusing his prime minister of siding with Moscow, several commentators instead see the conflict in the light of the upcoming presidential elections in 2010, when both the incumbent president and Timoshenko are expected to run for the top job. According to polls, Timoshenko is much more popular than Yuschenko. She enjoys at least 25% support among voters, while the leader of the opposition Party of Regions Viktor Yanukovych has 20% and Yushchenko a mere 6%. But observers also warn that Moscow will without doubt attempt to take advantage of the troubled situation. Read more with Euractiv MEPs squabble over Georgia resolution The European Parliament yesterday (3 September) adopted a resolution condemning Russia's actions in Georgia and calling on it to withdraw its troops immediately. But the text triggered protests from Socialist MEPs who objected to wording considered too soft on Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, seen by many as responsible for triggering the crisis. PositionsThe deputy head of the Ukrainian presidential secretariat Andrei Kislinsky echoed President Yuschenko in accusing Timoshenko of high treason. "The incumbent prime minister's activities betray high treason and political corruption," he said, adding that the information on the matter published earlier was based on "scrupulously verified facts that fully confirmed the Ukrainian government leadership's motive of acting against the national interests of the country". Kislinsky added: "We have information that there are certain agreements with the Russian Federation in respect of support to Timoshenko in the future presidential elections." According to him, the presidential secretariat knows of agreements with certain business circles that sponsor the Timoshenko Bloc. He also believes that her political party promised Russia to curb Ukraine's adoption of the NATO Membership Action Plan, to assume a pro-Russian or neutral position in the conflict with Georgia, and not to support Yushchenko's position on the creation of a single local Orthodox church in Ukraine. Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko accused President Viktor Yushchenko of wrecking the democratic coalition. "The president, jointly with his secretariat, didn't disdain to use any means to wreck the democratic coalition. It's a pity that the president takes an irresponsible position. Yesterday, the coalition was wrecked on his instructions," she said. Timoshenko added that Yushchenko "destroyed the democratic coalition for the second time. He did it for the first time in 2005 when I started fighting corruption in the presidential circles. And again now." She then went further, accusing Yuschenko of attacking her "in connection with the upcoming presidential election" to be held in early 2010. Olexiy Haran, a professor of political science in Kiev, said the political standoff was rooted more in the ambitions of Ukraine's political elite than in any plot by Russia to undercut Kiev's pro-west path. But he warned that "Moscow would try to capitalise on it". "If the coalition collapses, Ukraine's pro-Western drive will not change in the long term, but it will suffer short-term setbacks. This scenario would complicate Ukraine's efforts to integrate closer with NATO and the European Union in the near term." BackgroundViktor Yushchenko and Yulia Timoshenko swept to power after the 2004 'Orange Revolution' on promises to forge deeper ties with the West and become less dependent on Russia. But ever since, they have engaged in a bitter personal power struggle that has persistently handicapped the government. Yushchenko first appointed Timoshenko as prime minister in 2005. He fired her several months later, saying economic growth slowed under her rule. Yushchenko tried to make a deal with pro-Russian opposition leader Viktor Yanukovych in August 2006 but then dissolved parliament, accusing the pro-Russian politician of trying to oust him. Timoshenko returned as prime minister of the nation of 46 million in elections in December 2007, after her bloc and Yushchenko's party won a combined 228 seats in the 450-seat parliament. Further ReadingPress articles Ukrainian JournalPresident threatens to dismiss Parliament Kyiv Post, Ukraine:Pro-Western coalition crumbles as president warns of political coup Unian, Ukraine:Fears for Ukraine as pro-west coalition fails Kommersant, Russia:Tymoshenko sinks the orange Deutsche Welle:Georgian war and coalition collapse threaten Ukraine’s EU ties FT:Fears for Ukraine as pro-west coalition fails ITAR TASS, RussiaTimoshenko accuses Yuschenko of wrecking coalition