Norway’s Supreme Court will on Tuesday (15 January) hear arguments on whether EU ships can fish for snow crab off the Svalbard archipelago north of Norway without permission from Oslo, a case that could decide who has the right to explore for oil in the region.
At stake is whether the snow crab – whose meat is considered a delicacy by gourmets in Japan and South Korea – is a sedentary species living on the seabed or a fish stock that moves around – and who gets to decide about it.
Went to the zoo today. Spotted this snow crab who looks like he’s defending his honor in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee. pic.twitter.com/6djZb7ls2y
— Maria Chong (@mariachong) October 1, 2018
If it is seen as a sedentary species, then it is a resource belonging to the continental shelf of Norway. If the EU can stake a claim over the snow crab, then it could be harder for Oslo to secure its claim over potential oil and gas resources.
“The question of the snow crab is a proxy for oil. Because what is valid for the snow crab is valid for the oil industry,” Oeystein Jensen, a senior research fellow in law at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute in Oslo, told Reuters.
The issue arises out of a legal challenge to the Norwegian government by Latvian fisherman Peteris Pildegovics over the 2017 seizure by non-EU Norway of the Senator, an EU fishing vessel which he owns.
Norway argued successfully in a lower court that the European Commission does not have the right to issue fishing licenses off the Svalbard archipelago, over which it has sovereignty via a 1920 treaty.
Pildegovics appealed to the Supreme Court against that ruling and seeks to assert a right to fish for snow crab off Svalbard.
“There was no need for a Norwegian license,” he told Reuters. “We followed the procedure. Norwegian authorities were kept fully informed.”
Pildegovics estimated the loss of income due to the ship’s ongoing seizure at about 20 million euros a year. But Norway says only it has the right to issue fishing licenses for snow crab.
“The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – the constitution of the seas – is clear on this. It is only Norway as a coastal state that can give permission to fish on the Norwegian continental shelf,” Foreign Minister Ine Eriksen Soereide said in an April 2018 column.
In a sign of the importance the case has for Norway, a panel of 11 Supreme Court judges, a higher than usual number, will listen to the arguments during the three-day session starting on Tuesday.
Jensen, the academic, said that according to international law it is only coastal states that can grant licenses for the management of natural resources. “So Norway, via Svalbard, is the coastal state in charge,” he said.
“Now, the 1920 Svalbard Treaty forces Norway to treat all signatories fairly. The EU does not have the right to issue licenses, but the treaty grants the EU the right to be fairly treated. The EU, by issuing their own licenses, has ignored these steps and ignored international law,” he said.